Driven by rewards or punishments? Understanding real world social functioning in anxiety and depressive disorders

Angie M. Gross , Madeleine Rassaby , Samantha N. Hoffman , Colin A. Depp , Raeanne C. Moore , Charles T. Taylor
{"title":"Driven by rewards or punishments? Understanding real world social functioning in anxiety and depressive disorders","authors":"Angie M. Gross ,&nbsp;Madeleine Rassaby ,&nbsp;Samantha N. Hoffman ,&nbsp;Colin A. Depp ,&nbsp;Raeanne C. Moore ,&nbsp;Charles T. Taylor","doi":"10.1016/j.xjmad.2024.100097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Social disconnection is prevalent in anxiety and depressive disorders and adversely impacts well-being. Prevailing treatment approaches assume social disconnection is a by-product of anxiety or depressive symptoms; however, social impairments often persist following symptom reduction. To advance understanding of why people with anxiety or depression experience social disconnection, we tested a framework in which daily social experiences were predicted from dispositional sensitivities to positive (rewarding) vs. negative (aversive) outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Adults (<em>N</em> = 112; aged 18–55) seeking treatment for anxiety or depression completed a measure assessing approach temperament (i.e., general sensitivity to positive outcomes) and avoidance temperament (i.e., general sensitivity to negative outcomes). They subsequently received 20 ecological momentary assessment (EMA) surveys over five consecutive days measuring current social activity, perceived connectedness, loneliness, and positive and negative affect.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Individuals higher in approach temperament reported greater momentary social connectedness, lower loneliness, and more frequent social interactions (medium to large effects). They also experienced greater momentary positive affect, which was associated with all real-time social outcomes (medium to large effects). Avoidance temperament overall was not associated with daily social experiences nor affect; however, in subjects with low approach temperament, higher avoidance temperament predicted greater momentary negative affect. Real-time loneliness was linked to momentary negative affect, but only when momentary positive affect was low.</div></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><div>The study was correlational; thus, causal claims cannot be made.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Approach temperament and its associated affective states may be uniquely related to daily social experiences in anxiety and depression and could serve as targets for interventions intended to remediate social disconnection.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73841,"journal":{"name":"Journal of mood and anxiety disorders","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100097"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of mood and anxiety disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950004424000518","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Social disconnection is prevalent in anxiety and depressive disorders and adversely impacts well-being. Prevailing treatment approaches assume social disconnection is a by-product of anxiety or depressive symptoms; however, social impairments often persist following symptom reduction. To advance understanding of why people with anxiety or depression experience social disconnection, we tested a framework in which daily social experiences were predicted from dispositional sensitivities to positive (rewarding) vs. negative (aversive) outcomes.

Method

Adults (N = 112; aged 18–55) seeking treatment for anxiety or depression completed a measure assessing approach temperament (i.e., general sensitivity to positive outcomes) and avoidance temperament (i.e., general sensitivity to negative outcomes). They subsequently received 20 ecological momentary assessment (EMA) surveys over five consecutive days measuring current social activity, perceived connectedness, loneliness, and positive and negative affect.

Results

Individuals higher in approach temperament reported greater momentary social connectedness, lower loneliness, and more frequent social interactions (medium to large effects). They also experienced greater momentary positive affect, which was associated with all real-time social outcomes (medium to large effects). Avoidance temperament overall was not associated with daily social experiences nor affect; however, in subjects with low approach temperament, higher avoidance temperament predicted greater momentary negative affect. Real-time loneliness was linked to momentary negative affect, but only when momentary positive affect was low.

Limitations

The study was correlational; thus, causal claims cannot be made.

Conclusions

Approach temperament and its associated affective states may be uniquely related to daily social experiences in anxiety and depression and could serve as targets for interventions intended to remediate social disconnection.
是奖励还是惩罚?理解焦虑和抑郁障碍中的现实社会功能
社会脱节在焦虑和抑郁障碍中很普遍,并对健康产生不利影响。主流的治疗方法认为社交脱节是焦虑或抑郁症状的副产品;然而,在症状减轻后,社交障碍往往持续存在。为了进一步理解为什么焦虑或抑郁的人会经历社会脱节,我们测试了一个框架,在这个框架中,日常社会经验从性格敏感性预测到积极(奖励)与消极(厌恶)的结果。方法成人(N = 112;年龄在18-55岁之间的寻求焦虑或抑郁治疗的患者完成了一项评估接近气质(即对积极结果的一般敏感性)和回避气质(即对消极结果的一般敏感性)的测量。随后,他们在连续五天的时间里接受了20次生态瞬时评估(EMA)调查,测量当前的社会活动、感知联系、孤独感以及积极和消极影响。结果接近气质较高的个体报告了更多的瞬时社会联系,更低的孤独感和更频繁的社会互动(中大型效应)。他们还经历了更大的瞬间积极影响,这与所有实时社会结果(中等到大型影响)有关。总体而言,回避气质与日常社会经历无关,也不受影响;然而,在接近气质较低的受试者中,较高的回避气质预示着更大的瞬间负面情绪。实时孤独与瞬间消极情绪有关,但只有在瞬间积极情绪较低的情况下。局限性:本研究具有相关性;因此,不能提出因果关系的主张。结论趋近气质及其相关情感状态可能与焦虑和抑郁患者的日常社会经验有独特的关系,可以作为社会脱节修复干预的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of mood and anxiety disorders
Journal of mood and anxiety disorders Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Psychology (General), Behavioral Neuroscience
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信