Program evaluation of internet-delivered cognitive behavioral treatments for anxiety and depression in a digital clinic

Alexandra L. Silverman , IreLee Ferguson , Jacqueline R. Bullis , Harris Bajwa , Sara Mei , Courtney Beard
{"title":"Program evaluation of internet-delivered cognitive behavioral treatments for anxiety and depression in a digital clinic","authors":"Alexandra L. Silverman ,&nbsp;IreLee Ferguson ,&nbsp;Jacqueline R. Bullis ,&nbsp;Harris Bajwa ,&nbsp;Sara Mei ,&nbsp;Courtney Beard","doi":"10.1016/j.xjmad.2025.100106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>SilverCloud and THIS WAY UP (TWU) are two internet-delivered cognitive-behavioral therapy (iCBT) programs that have demonstrated effectiveness for anxiety and depression, yet little is known about their comparative effectiveness. This non-randomized program evaluation compared client satisfaction, subjective engagement, and treatment outcomes between the SilverCloud and TWU programs. Participants were 195 adult patients (106 using TWU and 89 using SilverCloud) enrolled in a digital CBT clinic who completed assessment measures at pre-treatment, mid-treatment, post-treatment, and one-, two-, three-, and four-month follow-ups. As hypothesized (preregistration: <span><span>osf.io/x6bmy</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>), patients in both programs reported high client satisfaction, and experienced improvements in depression (<em>d</em>s = -0.79 and −0.78), anxiety (<em>d</em>s = -0.95 and −0.84), and functional impairment (<em>d</em>s = -0.42 and −0.45), from pre- to post-treatment that were maintained at four-month follow-up. However, according to exploratory analyses, the slope of change in treatment outcomes was not significantly different between programs during the treatment and follow-up phases. As hypothesized, patients who used SilverCloud self-reported significantly greater subjective engagement with their iCBT program compared to patients who used TWU (<em>d</em>=0.36). However, contrary to hypotheses, client satisfaction was not significantly different between programs. This non-randomized program evaluation offers minimal evidence that one program was better than the other, though findings require replication in a randomized controlled trial and larger sample. Results provide further support for iCBT as a viable option to extend access to high-quality treatment for anxiety and depression.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73841,"journal":{"name":"Journal of mood and anxiety disorders","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100106"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of mood and anxiety disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950004425000033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

SilverCloud and THIS WAY UP (TWU) are two internet-delivered cognitive-behavioral therapy (iCBT) programs that have demonstrated effectiveness for anxiety and depression, yet little is known about their comparative effectiveness. This non-randomized program evaluation compared client satisfaction, subjective engagement, and treatment outcomes between the SilverCloud and TWU programs. Participants were 195 adult patients (106 using TWU and 89 using SilverCloud) enrolled in a digital CBT clinic who completed assessment measures at pre-treatment, mid-treatment, post-treatment, and one-, two-, three-, and four-month follow-ups. As hypothesized (preregistration: osf.io/x6bmy), patients in both programs reported high client satisfaction, and experienced improvements in depression (ds = -0.79 and −0.78), anxiety (ds = -0.95 and −0.84), and functional impairment (ds = -0.42 and −0.45), from pre- to post-treatment that were maintained at four-month follow-up. However, according to exploratory analyses, the slope of change in treatment outcomes was not significantly different between programs during the treatment and follow-up phases. As hypothesized, patients who used SilverCloud self-reported significantly greater subjective engagement with their iCBT program compared to patients who used TWU (d=0.36). However, contrary to hypotheses, client satisfaction was not significantly different between programs. This non-randomized program evaluation offers minimal evidence that one program was better than the other, though findings require replication in a randomized controlled trial and larger sample. Results provide further support for iCBT as a viable option to extend access to high-quality treatment for anxiety and depression.
数字化诊所中网络提供的焦虑和抑郁认知行为治疗的项目评估
SilverCloud和THIS WAY UP (TWU)是两个由互联网提供的认知行为疗法(iCBT)项目,已被证明对焦虑和抑郁有效,但它们的相对效果却鲜为人知。这项非随机方案评估比较了SilverCloud和TWU方案之间的客户满意度、主观参与度和治疗结果。参与者是195名成年患者(106名使用TWU, 89名使用SilverCloud),他们在数字CBT诊所注册,完成了治疗前、治疗中、治疗后以及1、2、3和4个月随访的评估措施。正如假设(注册前:osf.io/x6bmy),两个项目的患者都报告了很高的客户满意度,并且从治疗前到治疗后,在抑郁( = -0.79和- 0.78)、焦虑( = -0.95和- 0.84)和功能障碍( = -0.42和- 0.45)方面得到了改善,并维持了四个月的随访。然而,根据探索性分析,在治疗阶段和随访阶段,治疗结果的变化斜率在方案之间没有显着差异。正如假设的那样,与使用TWU的患者相比,使用SilverCloud的患者自我报告的iCBT计划的主观参与度显著提高(d=0.36)。然而,与假设相反,客户满意度在项目之间没有显著差异。这种非随机方案评估提供了最少的证据表明一个方案比另一个方案好,尽管研究结果需要在随机对照试验和更大的样本中进行复制。结果进一步支持iCBT作为一种可行的选择,以扩大获得高质量的治疗焦虑和抑郁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of mood and anxiety disorders
Journal of mood and anxiety disorders Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Psychology (General), Behavioral Neuroscience
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信