Frameworks for the design and reporting of anaesthesia interventions in perioperative clinical trials

Karen D. Coulman , Lucy Elliott , Natalie S. Blencowe , Joyce Yeung , Leila Rooshenas , Robert J. Hinchliffe , Ronelle Mouton
{"title":"Frameworks for the design and reporting of anaesthesia interventions in perioperative clinical trials","authors":"Karen D. Coulman ,&nbsp;Lucy Elliott ,&nbsp;Natalie S. Blencowe ,&nbsp;Joyce Yeung ,&nbsp;Leila Rooshenas ,&nbsp;Robert J. Hinchliffe ,&nbsp;Ronelle Mouton","doi":"10.1016/j.bjao.2024.100374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Interventions from RCTs can only be replicated and implemented if reported in sufficient detail. This study developed frameworks to assist researchers with describing, monitoring, and reporting the key components of anaesthetic interventions in trials.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study comprised three phases: (1) initial framework development—text describing the delivery of anaesthetic interventions was coded and categorised into components using thematic analysis; (2) refinement of frameworks—facilitated structured group discussions were conducted with perioperative clinicians, researchers, and journal editors to elicit additional framework categories and consider clarity and feasibility; (3) framework testing and further refinement—cognitive interviews with professionals undertaking trials evaluating anaesthesia interventions to test the feasibility of using the frameworks in contemporary perioperative trials.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Three frameworks were developed for general, regional, and sedation anaesthesia interventions. Data saturation of categories within the frameworks was reached after inclusion of 15 RCTs for general and regional anaesthesia, and 13 for sedation. Each framework is structured into three main sections: (1) professional(s) delivering the intervention; (2) setting; and (3) intervention components, with descriptions of the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative stages unique to each anaesthetic intervention. Each framework deconstructs an anaesthetic intervention into component parts to support researchers with the design and reporting of RCTs. Final frameworks are available at: <span><span>https://anaesthesiaframeworks.blogs.bristol.ac.uk/</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>We provide novel frameworks to be used during the design of perioperative trials to facilitate the design, delivery, and reporting of anaesthesia interventions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72418,"journal":{"name":"BJA open","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100374"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJA open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772609624001242","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Interventions from RCTs can only be replicated and implemented if reported in sufficient detail. This study developed frameworks to assist researchers with describing, monitoring, and reporting the key components of anaesthetic interventions in trials.

Methods

This study comprised three phases: (1) initial framework development—text describing the delivery of anaesthetic interventions was coded and categorised into components using thematic analysis; (2) refinement of frameworks—facilitated structured group discussions were conducted with perioperative clinicians, researchers, and journal editors to elicit additional framework categories and consider clarity and feasibility; (3) framework testing and further refinement—cognitive interviews with professionals undertaking trials evaluating anaesthesia interventions to test the feasibility of using the frameworks in contemporary perioperative trials.

Results

Three frameworks were developed for general, regional, and sedation anaesthesia interventions. Data saturation of categories within the frameworks was reached after inclusion of 15 RCTs for general and regional anaesthesia, and 13 for sedation. Each framework is structured into three main sections: (1) professional(s) delivering the intervention; (2) setting; and (3) intervention components, with descriptions of the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative stages unique to each anaesthetic intervention. Each framework deconstructs an anaesthetic intervention into component parts to support researchers with the design and reporting of RCTs. Final frameworks are available at: https://anaesthesiaframeworks.blogs.bristol.ac.uk/.

Conclusions

We provide novel frameworks to be used during the design of perioperative trials to facilitate the design, delivery, and reporting of anaesthesia interventions.
围手术期临床试验中麻醉干预的设计和报告框架
背景:rct的干预措施只有在报告足够详细的情况下才能被复制和实施。本研究开发了框架,以帮助研究人员描述、监测和报告试验中麻醉干预的关键组成部分。方法本研究包括三个阶段:(1)初步框架开发-使用主题分析将描述麻醉干预交付的文本编码并分类为组件;(2)完善框架——与围手术期临床医生、研究人员和期刊编辑进行结构化小组讨论,以引出额外的框架类别,并考虑其清晰度和可行性;(3)框架测试和进一步改进-与从事评估麻醉干预试验的专业人员进行认知访谈,以测试在当代围手术期试验中使用框架的可行性。结果:制定了全面、局部和镇静麻醉干预的三个框架。纳入15项全麻和区域麻醉随机对照试验以及13项镇静随机对照试验后,框架内类别的数据达到饱和。每个框架分为三个主要部分:(1)专业人员提供干预;(2)设置;(3)干预的组成部分,包括对每种麻醉干预的术前、术中和术后各阶段的描述。每个框架将麻醉干预解构为组成部分,以支持研究人员设计和报告随机对照试验。最终框架可在:https://anaesthesiaframeworks.blogs.bristol.ac.uk/.ConclusionsWe上获得,提供围手术期试验设计中使用的新框架,以促进麻醉干预措施的设计、交付和报告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJA open
BJA open Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
83 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信