Identifying resilient areas for seagrass restoration by integrating suitability modelling and climate forecasting

IF 2.6 3区 地球科学 Q1 MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY
Oliver Dalby , Mary A. Young , Emma L. Jackson , Yi Mei Tan , Rhys A. Coleman , Kathy Cinque , Peter Yeates , Perran Cook , Peter I. Macreadie , Daniel Ierodiaconou , Craig D.H. Sherman
{"title":"Identifying resilient areas for seagrass restoration by integrating suitability modelling and climate forecasting","authors":"Oliver Dalby ,&nbsp;Mary A. Young ,&nbsp;Emma L. Jackson ,&nbsp;Yi Mei Tan ,&nbsp;Rhys A. Coleman ,&nbsp;Kathy Cinque ,&nbsp;Peter Yeates ,&nbsp;Perran Cook ,&nbsp;Peter I. Macreadie ,&nbsp;Daniel Ierodiaconou ,&nbsp;Craig D.H. Sherman","doi":"10.1016/j.ecss.2024.109096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Seagrass restoration can reverse trajectories of decline and foster the return of lost ecosystem services, however, poor site selection can hinder restoration success. Suitability modelling is increasingly used to identify contemporary restoration areas, but suitability can change due to environmental perturbations, potentially rendering areas unsuitable under different scenarios (E.g. climate change). Thus, there is a need for restoration practitioners to both identify contemporary areas for restoration and shortlist those resilient to environmental change. Here we use Western Port, Victoria, Australia as a case study demonstrating how forecasted suitability models can identify resilient areas for seagrass restoration and avoid areas that may be unsuitable under future forecasts (risky sites). Initially, the random forest algorithm was used to identify contemporary intertidal and subtidal seagrass restoration areas. Once identified, the resilience of these areas was assessed using environmental scenarios representing degradations to local light environments and climate change related variables (temperature, solar radiation, depth, and salinity). Models initially identified 161 km<sup>2</sup> of areas suitable for seagrass restoration. However, only 71% (115 km<sup>2</sup>) remained suitable under 2030 climate change projections, and 62% (100 km<sup>2</sup>) remained suitable under 2090 projections. Both 2030 and 2090 projections predicted reductions in suitability in areas that were still identified as suitable for restoration in the future, suggesting climate change may both reduce the areal extent of areas for restoration and reduce their quality. Approaches used here can be transferred to other restoration programs worldwide and across taxa and demonstrate the benefits of forecasting restoration suitability to avoid risk and increase restoration success.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50497,"journal":{"name":"Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science","volume":"313 ","pages":"Article 109096"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272771424004840","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Seagrass restoration can reverse trajectories of decline and foster the return of lost ecosystem services, however, poor site selection can hinder restoration success. Suitability modelling is increasingly used to identify contemporary restoration areas, but suitability can change due to environmental perturbations, potentially rendering areas unsuitable under different scenarios (E.g. climate change). Thus, there is a need for restoration practitioners to both identify contemporary areas for restoration and shortlist those resilient to environmental change. Here we use Western Port, Victoria, Australia as a case study demonstrating how forecasted suitability models can identify resilient areas for seagrass restoration and avoid areas that may be unsuitable under future forecasts (risky sites). Initially, the random forest algorithm was used to identify contemporary intertidal and subtidal seagrass restoration areas. Once identified, the resilience of these areas was assessed using environmental scenarios representing degradations to local light environments and climate change related variables (temperature, solar radiation, depth, and salinity). Models initially identified 161 km2 of areas suitable for seagrass restoration. However, only 71% (115 km2) remained suitable under 2030 climate change projections, and 62% (100 km2) remained suitable under 2090 projections. Both 2030 and 2090 projections predicted reductions in suitability in areas that were still identified as suitable for restoration in the future, suggesting climate change may both reduce the areal extent of areas for restoration and reduce their quality. Approaches used here can be transferred to other restoration programs worldwide and across taxa and demonstrate the benefits of forecasting restoration suitability to avoid risk and increase restoration success.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
374
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science is an international multidisciplinary journal devoted to the analysis of saline water phenomena ranging from the outer edge of the continental shelf to the upper limits of the tidal zone. The journal provides a unique forum, unifying the multidisciplinary approaches to the study of the oceanography of estuaries, coastal zones, and continental shelf seas. It features original research papers, review papers and short communications treating such disciplines as zoology, botany, geology, sedimentology, physical oceanography.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信