Jia Shi , Jihong Chen , Zheng Wan , Shaorui Zhou , Ye Jun , Yaqing Shu
{"title":"The impact of low-sulfur marine fuel policy on air pollution in global coastal cities","authors":"Jia Shi , Jihong Chen , Zheng Wan , Shaorui Zhou , Ye Jun , Yaqing Shu","doi":"10.1016/j.horiz.2024.100130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Shipping emissions significantly contribute to the fallout of air pollutants in many coastal cities. Among these emissions, sulfur dioxide (SO<sub>2</sub>) is a major concern because it not only causes acid rain and photochemical smog that seriously damages human health but also damages sensitive ecosystems around the world. The United Nations and many local governments have established regulatory schemes to reduce SO<sub>2</sub> by setting global regulations and emission control areas (ECAs) that would require the use of much cleaner marine fuel with lower sulfur content or equivalent SO<sub>2</sub> scrubber devices. By combining remote sensing with spatial econometric models, we find that SO<sub>2</sub> decreases with implementation of regulations on sulfur limits varied across the study areas. The emission control areas in North America and China can reduce the average sulfur dioxide concentration in coastal cities by about 3–5 %, but in the Baltic and North Seas, ECAs did not show a significant impact at the spatial average level. While the overall spatially averaged SO<sub>2</sub> changes were relatively small, port cities and offshore waters with frequent shipping activities experienced significantly larger reductions, ranging from 10 % to 28 %. In addition, setting a general cap on sulfur content may be a better way to curb air pollution in coastal cities. The Mediterranean region and China experienced more notable reductions in SO<sub>2</sub> concentrations, namely 6.4 % and 3.8 %, respectively, following the adoption of the global regulation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101199,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Horizons","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100130"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Horizons","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772737824000415","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Shipping emissions significantly contribute to the fallout of air pollutants in many coastal cities. Among these emissions, sulfur dioxide (SO2) is a major concern because it not only causes acid rain and photochemical smog that seriously damages human health but also damages sensitive ecosystems around the world. The United Nations and many local governments have established regulatory schemes to reduce SO2 by setting global regulations and emission control areas (ECAs) that would require the use of much cleaner marine fuel with lower sulfur content or equivalent SO2 scrubber devices. By combining remote sensing with spatial econometric models, we find that SO2 decreases with implementation of regulations on sulfur limits varied across the study areas. The emission control areas in North America and China can reduce the average sulfur dioxide concentration in coastal cities by about 3–5 %, but in the Baltic and North Seas, ECAs did not show a significant impact at the spatial average level. While the overall spatially averaged SO2 changes were relatively small, port cities and offshore waters with frequent shipping activities experienced significantly larger reductions, ranging from 10 % to 28 %. In addition, setting a general cap on sulfur content may be a better way to curb air pollution in coastal cities. The Mediterranean region and China experienced more notable reductions in SO2 concentrations, namely 6.4 % and 3.8 %, respectively, following the adoption of the global regulation.