Development of a key performance indicator set for perioperative red blood cell transfusion

Akshay Shah , Hayley G. Evans , Antony J.R. Palmer , Alan M. MacDonald , Martha Belete , Linda von Neree , Michael M.F. Murphy , Simon J. Stanworth , Robbie Foy , for the NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit in Data Driven Transfusion Practice
{"title":"Development of a key performance indicator set for perioperative red blood cell transfusion","authors":"Akshay Shah ,&nbsp;Hayley G. Evans ,&nbsp;Antony J.R. Palmer ,&nbsp;Alan M. MacDonald ,&nbsp;Martha Belete ,&nbsp;Linda von Neree ,&nbsp;Michael M.F. Murphy ,&nbsp;Simon J. Stanworth ,&nbsp;Robbie Foy ,&nbsp;for the NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit in Data Driven Transfusion Practice","doi":"10.1016/j.bjao.2024.100372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Perioperative red blood cell (RBC) transfusion is a common intervention in patients undergoing surgery but there is marked variation in practice. Key performance indicators (KPIs) are central to identifying deviation from agreed standards and improving clinical outcomes. We aimed to identify KPIs which can potentially be measured from routinely collected electronic healthcare records.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We undertook a three-stage process. First, we completed a scoping review to identify potential KPIs from relevant literature and clinical guidelines. Next, we conducted a modified RAND consensus process with a multidisciplinary panel including medical professionals, patients and public involvement members. The consensus panel rated these KPIs according to importance and feasibility.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We identified 28 candidate KPIs covering the entire perioperative RBC transfusion process. The majority of the KPIs focused on improving patient care around the time of decision to transfuse RBCs and transfusion safety. Clinical outcome KPIs included hospital length of stay, hospital acquired infection, mortality, and hospital readmission at 30 and 90 days. Five candidate KPIs were judged as unimportant whilst there were concerns around the feasibility of measurement using routine data for 14 candidate KPIs. The panel identified nine potential KPIs for future testing.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Using a systematic, stepwise, transparent approach, we have identified a set of 28 KPIs for assessment, monitoring, and improvement of perioperative RBC transfusion. Future research is needed to further validate this set for external use and benchmarking between hospitals and departments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72418,"journal":{"name":"BJA open","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100372"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJA open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772609624001229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Perioperative red blood cell (RBC) transfusion is a common intervention in patients undergoing surgery but there is marked variation in practice. Key performance indicators (KPIs) are central to identifying deviation from agreed standards and improving clinical outcomes. We aimed to identify KPIs which can potentially be measured from routinely collected electronic healthcare records.

Methods

We undertook a three-stage process. First, we completed a scoping review to identify potential KPIs from relevant literature and clinical guidelines. Next, we conducted a modified RAND consensus process with a multidisciplinary panel including medical professionals, patients and public involvement members. The consensus panel rated these KPIs according to importance and feasibility.

Results

We identified 28 candidate KPIs covering the entire perioperative RBC transfusion process. The majority of the KPIs focused on improving patient care around the time of decision to transfuse RBCs and transfusion safety. Clinical outcome KPIs included hospital length of stay, hospital acquired infection, mortality, and hospital readmission at 30 and 90 days. Five candidate KPIs were judged as unimportant whilst there were concerns around the feasibility of measurement using routine data for 14 candidate KPIs. The panel identified nine potential KPIs for future testing.

Conclusions

Using a systematic, stepwise, transparent approach, we have identified a set of 28 KPIs for assessment, monitoring, and improvement of perioperative RBC transfusion. Future research is needed to further validate this set for external use and benchmarking between hospitals and departments.
围手术期红细胞输血关键绩效指标的制定
背景围手术期输注红细胞(RBC)是一种常见的手术干预措施,但在实践中存在显著差异。关键绩效指标(kpi)对于识别与商定标准的偏差和改善临床结果至关重要。我们的目标是确定可以从常规收集的电子医疗记录中测量的kpi。方法我们采取了三个阶段的过程。首先,我们完成了一项范围审查,从相关文献和临床指南中确定潜在的kpi。接下来,我们与包括医疗专业人员、患者和公众参与成员在内的多学科小组进行了修改后的兰德共识过程。共识小组根据重要性和可行性对这些kpi进行评级。结果我们确定了28个候选kpi,涵盖了整个围手术期红细胞输血过程。大多数kpi侧重于在决定输注红细胞和输血安全时改善患者护理。临床结局kpi包括住院时间、医院获得性感染、死亡率和30天和90天的再入院率。5个候选kpi被认为是不重要的,而对14个候选kpi使用常规数据进行测量的可行性存在担忧。该小组确定了未来测试的9个潜在kpi。结论:采用系统的、逐步的、透明的方法,我们确定了一套28个关键绩效指标,用于评估、监测和改善围手术期红细胞输血。未来的研究需要进一步验证这一套外部使用和医院和部门之间的基准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJA open
BJA open Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
83 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信