Propensity score-matched analysis in isolated left ventricular dilation in non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
T. Gonçalves , T. Pezel , P. Garot , S. Toupin , S. Duhamel , F. Sanguineti , T. Unterseeh , T. Hovasse , E. Gall , L. Hamzi , A. Unger , J.-G. Dillinger , P. Henry , V. Bousson , J. Garot
{"title":"Propensity score-matched analysis in isolated left ventricular dilation in non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy","authors":"T. Gonçalves ,&nbsp;T. Pezel ,&nbsp;P. Garot ,&nbsp;S. Toupin ,&nbsp;S. Duhamel ,&nbsp;F. Sanguineti ,&nbsp;T. Unterseeh ,&nbsp;T. Hovasse ,&nbsp;E. Gall ,&nbsp;L. Hamzi ,&nbsp;A. Unger ,&nbsp;J.-G. Dillinger ,&nbsp;P. Henry ,&nbsp;V. Bousson ,&nbsp;J. Garot","doi":"10.1016/j.acvd.2024.10.096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The presence and extent of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) are strong prognosticators of death in patients with non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), defined as left ventricular (LV) dilation and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)<!--> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->50%. Although the current guidelines defined the concept of “isolated LV dilation” (ILVD) as LV dilation with preserved LVEF<!--> <!-->≥<!--> <!-->50%, the prognostic value of the “LGE granularity” is not established in this population.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To assess the prognostic value of the concept of “LGE granularity” including its extent, location, and pattern for predicting all-cause death above traditional prognosticators in patients with DCM or ILVD, separately.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Between 2008 and 2021, all consecutive patients with DCM and ILVD without implantable cardioverter-defibrillator or history of sustained ventricular arrhythmia referred for CMR were included in two centres. The primary outcome was all-cause death using the French National Registry of Death. A propensity score matching was performed to balance characteristics in patients with DCM vs. those with ILVD. Cox regressions were performed to determine the prognostic value of each LGE findings.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 2752 patients analysed (age 52<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->8 years, 56% male), 15% patients died after a median (inter-quartile range) follow-up of 9 (7–12) years. A total of 737 (27%) patients had LGE. In the propensity-score matched population (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1084 in DCM subgroup and <em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1084 in isolated LV dilation), the LGE presence was associated with death (HR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->2.98, 95%CI: 1.97–4.50, <em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001). In ILVD patients with LGE (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->265), the LGE extent (HR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.41, 95%CI: 1.09–1.83, <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.009), the presence of LGE in multiple areas (HR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->3.86, 95%CI: 1.73–8.61, <em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001) and the septal location (HR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->2.97, 95%CI: 1.37–6.46, <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.006) were strong prognosticators of death after adjustment for traditional prognosticators (<span><span>Figure 1</span></span>). Similarly, in DCM patients with LGE (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->268), the LGE extent (HR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.42, 95%CI: 1.07–1.89, <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.014), the LGE presence in multiple areas (HR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->8.41, 95%CI: 3.32–21.3, <em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001) and the septal location (HR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->6.65, 95%CI: 3.02–14.6, <em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001) were strongly associated with death.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The concept of “LGE granularity” was independently associated with all-cause death after adjustment for all traditional prognosticators in both DCM and ILVD. These results suggest that CMR assessment could improve the risk stratification in this population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55472,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases","volume":"118 1","pages":"Page S53"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875213624004418","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The presence and extent of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) are strong prognosticators of death in patients with non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), defined as left ventricular (LV) dilation and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 50%. Although the current guidelines defined the concept of “isolated LV dilation” (ILVD) as LV dilation with preserved LVEF  50%, the prognostic value of the “LGE granularity” is not established in this population.

Objective

To assess the prognostic value of the concept of “LGE granularity” including its extent, location, and pattern for predicting all-cause death above traditional prognosticators in patients with DCM or ILVD, separately.

Method

Between 2008 and 2021, all consecutive patients with DCM and ILVD without implantable cardioverter-defibrillator or history of sustained ventricular arrhythmia referred for CMR were included in two centres. The primary outcome was all-cause death using the French National Registry of Death. A propensity score matching was performed to balance characteristics in patients with DCM vs. those with ILVD. Cox regressions were performed to determine the prognostic value of each LGE findings.

Results

Of 2752 patients analysed (age 52 ± 8 years, 56% male), 15% patients died after a median (inter-quartile range) follow-up of 9 (7–12) years. A total of 737 (27%) patients had LGE. In the propensity-score matched population (n = 1084 in DCM subgroup and n = 1084 in isolated LV dilation), the LGE presence was associated with death (HR = 2.98, 95%CI: 1.97–4.50, p < 0.001). In ILVD patients with LGE (n = 265), the LGE extent (HR = 1.41, 95%CI: 1.09–1.83, p = 0.009), the presence of LGE in multiple areas (HR = 3.86, 95%CI: 1.73–8.61, p < 0.001) and the septal location (HR = 2.97, 95%CI: 1.37–6.46, p = 0.006) were strong prognosticators of death after adjustment for traditional prognosticators (Figure 1). Similarly, in DCM patients with LGE (n = 268), the LGE extent (HR = 1.42, 95%CI: 1.07–1.89, p = 0.014), the LGE presence in multiple areas (HR = 8.41, 95%CI: 3.32–21.3, p < 0.001) and the septal location (HR = 6.65, 95%CI: 3.02–14.6, p < 0.001) were strongly associated with death.

Conclusion

The concept of “LGE granularity” was independently associated with all-cause death after adjustment for all traditional prognosticators in both DCM and ILVD. These results suggest that CMR assessment could improve the risk stratification in this population.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases
Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
87
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: The Journal publishes original peer-reviewed clinical and research articles, epidemiological studies, new methodological clinical approaches, review articles and editorials. Topics covered include coronary artery and valve diseases, interventional and pediatric cardiology, cardiovascular surgery, cardiomyopathy and heart failure, arrhythmias and stimulation, cardiovascular imaging, vascular medicine and hypertension, epidemiology and risk factors, and large multicenter studies. Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases also publishes abstracts of papers presented at the annual sessions of the Journées Européennes de la Société Française de Cardiologie and the guidelines edited by the French Society of Cardiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信