Joanna Dong , Naiem T. Issa , Michael Kaiser , Simonetta I. Gaumond , Michael Solis , Joel Gil , Robert S. Kirsner , Stephen C. Davis , Joaquin J. Jimenez
{"title":"Use of Midodrine for Intraoperative Hemostasis in Cutaneous and Percutaneous Surgery","authors":"Joanna Dong , Naiem T. Issa , Michael Kaiser , Simonetta I. Gaumond , Michael Solis , Joel Gil , Robert S. Kirsner , Stephen C. Davis , Joaquin J. Jimenez","doi":"10.1016/j.xjidi.2024.100335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Owing to the increasingly high volume of cutaneous and percutaneous procedures performed annually, the demand for local anesthesia has steadily risen. The gold-standard formulations for local anesthesia contain epinephrine at a concentration of 1:100,000 added to lidocaine to aid in hemostasis. Epinephrine, an α-agonist, also exhibits off-target β-adrenergic effects that carry risk of adverse events with these injections. Furthermore, the ongoing global shortage of epinephrine highlights the need for a safer and viable alternative. Midodrine, a targeted a<sub>1</sub>-adrenergic receptor agonist, is utilized as a vasopressor to induce arterial and venous vasoconstriction. We developed a formulation of 2% lidocaine combined with 1:2,000,000 epinephrine and 50 μM midodrine (midodrine/lidocaine/epinephrine formulation), hypothesizing that this combination would exhibit synergism on hemostasis. In a porcine model of blood loss after punch biopsies, our formulation was compared with 2% lidocaine; 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine; 2% lidocaine with 1:2,000,000 epinephrine; and 2% lidocaine with 50 μM midodrine. Our results indicate that 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and our midodrine/lidocaine/epinephrine formulation were statistically comparable, with both significantly reducing bleeding when compared with the 2% lidocaine (<em>P</em> < .05). The 2% lidocaine with midodrine alone also showed additional promise as an effective hemostatic formulation. Thus, combination of low-concentration epinephrine and midodrine with lidocaine may exhibit synergistic hemostatic effect in cutaneous surgical settings while reducing potential off-target effects of either vasoconstrictor alone at higher concentrations as adjunct monotherapies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73548,"journal":{"name":"JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health","volume":"5 2","pages":"Article 100335"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667026724000833","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Owing to the increasingly high volume of cutaneous and percutaneous procedures performed annually, the demand for local anesthesia has steadily risen. The gold-standard formulations for local anesthesia contain epinephrine at a concentration of 1:100,000 added to lidocaine to aid in hemostasis. Epinephrine, an α-agonist, also exhibits off-target β-adrenergic effects that carry risk of adverse events with these injections. Furthermore, the ongoing global shortage of epinephrine highlights the need for a safer and viable alternative. Midodrine, a targeted a1-adrenergic receptor agonist, is utilized as a vasopressor to induce arterial and venous vasoconstriction. We developed a formulation of 2% lidocaine combined with 1:2,000,000 epinephrine and 50 μM midodrine (midodrine/lidocaine/epinephrine formulation), hypothesizing that this combination would exhibit synergism on hemostasis. In a porcine model of blood loss after punch biopsies, our formulation was compared with 2% lidocaine; 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine; 2% lidocaine with 1:2,000,000 epinephrine; and 2% lidocaine with 50 μM midodrine. Our results indicate that 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and our midodrine/lidocaine/epinephrine formulation were statistically comparable, with both significantly reducing bleeding when compared with the 2% lidocaine (P < .05). The 2% lidocaine with midodrine alone also showed additional promise as an effective hemostatic formulation. Thus, combination of low-concentration epinephrine and midodrine with lidocaine may exhibit synergistic hemostatic effect in cutaneous surgical settings while reducing potential off-target effects of either vasoconstrictor alone at higher concentrations as adjunct monotherapies.