Gender disparities in outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected left main coronary artery disease

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
A. Ghrab, S. Charfeddine, M. Derwich, R. Gargouri, A. Bahloul, T. Ellouze, M. Jabeur, F. Triki, L. Abid
{"title":"Gender disparities in outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected left main coronary artery disease","authors":"A. Ghrab,&nbsp;S. Charfeddine,&nbsp;M. Derwich,&nbsp;R. Gargouri,&nbsp;A. Bahloul,&nbsp;T. Ellouze,&nbsp;M. Jabeur,&nbsp;F. Triki,&nbsp;L. Abid","doi":"10.1016/j.acvd.2024.10.071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Understanding the nuanced disparities in clinical outcomes between male and female patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for unprotected left main coronary artery disease (CAD) is pivotal in refining patient care and treatment protocols.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To determine the sex-specific outcomes in left main PCI.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>We analysed data from 213 patients (48 females; 165 males) with unprotected left main CAD who underwent PCI between January 2012 and January 2023 in our catheterization lab. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, or stroke.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Median follow-up duration was 2.16 years. Although women tended to be older and had higher rates of diabetes mellitus and hypertension, these distinctions were not statistically significant. Men more frequently presented with left main bifurcation lesions and extensive CAD. Baseline findings revealed that wall motion abnormalities were more prevalent in men compared to women (68.3% <em>vs.</em> 50%, respectively; <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.020). Notably, the presence of wall motion abnormalities emerged as a significant predictor of adverse outcomes, including total mortality (19.2% <em>vs.</em> 5.4%; <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.007) and cardiac death (16.2% <em>vs.</em> 2.7%; <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.003). However, the primary endpoint did not exhibit a statistically significant difference between genders (20.8% <em>vs.</em> 24.8%, respectively; <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.569). Similarly, the requirement for target lesion revascularization was comparable in both groups (7.9% <em>vs.</em> 12.5%, respectively; <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.566).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Despite variations in clinical and lesion characteristics, female and male patients demonstrated similar long-term outcomes post-PCI for left main CAD.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55472,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases","volume":"118 1","pages":"Page S13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875213624004169","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Understanding the nuanced disparities in clinical outcomes between male and female patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for unprotected left main coronary artery disease (CAD) is pivotal in refining patient care and treatment protocols.

Objective

To determine the sex-specific outcomes in left main PCI.

Method

We analysed data from 213 patients (48 females; 165 males) with unprotected left main CAD who underwent PCI between January 2012 and January 2023 in our catheterization lab. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, or stroke.

Results

Median follow-up duration was 2.16 years. Although women tended to be older and had higher rates of diabetes mellitus and hypertension, these distinctions were not statistically significant. Men more frequently presented with left main bifurcation lesions and extensive CAD. Baseline findings revealed that wall motion abnormalities were more prevalent in men compared to women (68.3% vs. 50%, respectively; p = 0.020). Notably, the presence of wall motion abnormalities emerged as a significant predictor of adverse outcomes, including total mortality (19.2% vs. 5.4%; p = 0.007) and cardiac death (16.2% vs. 2.7%; p = 0.003). However, the primary endpoint did not exhibit a statistically significant difference between genders (20.8% vs. 24.8%, respectively; p = 0.569). Similarly, the requirement for target lesion revascularization was comparable in both groups (7.9% vs. 12.5%, respectively; p = 0.566).

Conclusion

Despite variations in clinical and lesion characteristics, female and male patients demonstrated similar long-term outcomes post-PCI for left main CAD.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases
Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
87
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: The Journal publishes original peer-reviewed clinical and research articles, epidemiological studies, new methodological clinical approaches, review articles and editorials. Topics covered include coronary artery and valve diseases, interventional and pediatric cardiology, cardiovascular surgery, cardiomyopathy and heart failure, arrhythmias and stimulation, cardiovascular imaging, vascular medicine and hypertension, epidemiology and risk factors, and large multicenter studies. Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases also publishes abstracts of papers presented at the annual sessions of the Journées Européennes de la Société Française de Cardiologie and the guidelines edited by the French Society of Cardiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信