Effects of drought on carbonyl sulfide exchange in four plant species

IF 6.8 Q1 PLANT SCIENCES
Felix M. Spielmann , Florian Kitz , Thomas Roach , Ilse Kranner , Albin Hammerle , Georg Wohlfahrt
{"title":"Effects of drought on carbonyl sulfide exchange in four plant species","authors":"Felix M. Spielmann ,&nbsp;Florian Kitz ,&nbsp;Thomas Roach ,&nbsp;Ilse Kranner ,&nbsp;Albin Hammerle ,&nbsp;Georg Wohlfahrt","doi":"10.1016/j.stress.2024.100735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The trace gas carbonyl sulfide (COS) is used for estimating gross primary productivity at ecosystem level (GPP), as the net CO₂ flux is confounded by ecosystem respiration. Laboratory measurements studying the ratio of the deposition velocities of COS and CO<sub>2</sub> at leaf level, i.e. leaf relative uptake rate (LRU), are required for calculating GPP. Under optimal conditions, the LRU has been suggested to be relatively constant. However, stress factors may affect the LRU and even lead to COS emission, which contradicts the prevailing scientific consensus. This study investigated the effect of drought on LRU in three C<sub>3</sub> species, rapeseed, soybean and tobacco, and the C<sub>4</sub> plant, amaranth.</div><div>Our results revealed species-specific responses, with the LRU decreasing in C<sub>3</sub> plants and increasing primarily in the C<sub>4</sub> species under drought. We observed net COS emissions in soybean and rapeseed during drought and for the latter also under unstressed conditions. These emissions suggest bidirectional COS exchange, likely interfering with the unidirectional COS uptake concept underlying LRU even during net COS uptake.</div><div>In all C<sub>3</sub> species, drought induced an increase in leaf cysteine, supporting a cysteine-related COS emission pathway. However, in amaranth cysteine levels decreased in contrast to the COS flux, and were not the highest in rapeseed despite elevated COS emission, altogether showing that factors involved in COS flux require further investigation.</div><div>Overall, our findings challenge the use of COS as a universal tracer for GPP and underscore the need for further research into COS emissions and LRU variability across species, particularly under environmental stress.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34736,"journal":{"name":"Plant Stress","volume":"15 ","pages":"Article 100735"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant Stress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667064X24003889","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The trace gas carbonyl sulfide (COS) is used for estimating gross primary productivity at ecosystem level (GPP), as the net CO₂ flux is confounded by ecosystem respiration. Laboratory measurements studying the ratio of the deposition velocities of COS and CO2 at leaf level, i.e. leaf relative uptake rate (LRU), are required for calculating GPP. Under optimal conditions, the LRU has been suggested to be relatively constant. However, stress factors may affect the LRU and even lead to COS emission, which contradicts the prevailing scientific consensus. This study investigated the effect of drought on LRU in three C3 species, rapeseed, soybean and tobacco, and the C4 plant, amaranth.
Our results revealed species-specific responses, with the LRU decreasing in C3 plants and increasing primarily in the C4 species under drought. We observed net COS emissions in soybean and rapeseed during drought and for the latter also under unstressed conditions. These emissions suggest bidirectional COS exchange, likely interfering with the unidirectional COS uptake concept underlying LRU even during net COS uptake.
In all C3 species, drought induced an increase in leaf cysteine, supporting a cysteine-related COS emission pathway. However, in amaranth cysteine levels decreased in contrast to the COS flux, and were not the highest in rapeseed despite elevated COS emission, altogether showing that factors involved in COS flux require further investigation.
Overall, our findings challenge the use of COS as a universal tracer for GPP and underscore the need for further research into COS emissions and LRU variability across species, particularly under environmental stress.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Plant Stress
Plant Stress PLANT SCIENCES-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.00%
发文量
76
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: The journal Plant Stress deals with plant (or other photoautotrophs, such as algae, cyanobacteria and lichens) responses to abiotic and biotic stress factors that can result in limited growth and productivity. Such responses can be analyzed and described at a physiological, biochemical and molecular level. Experimental approaches/technologies aiming to improve growth and productivity with a potential for downstream validation under stress conditions will also be considered. Both fundamental and applied research manuscripts are welcome, provided that clear mechanistic hypotheses are made and descriptive approaches are avoided. In addition, high-quality review articles will also be considered, provided they follow a critical approach and stimulate thought for future research avenues. Plant Stress welcomes high-quality manuscripts related (but not limited) to interactions between plants and: Lack of water (drought) and excess (flooding), Salinity stress, Elevated temperature and/or low temperature (chilling and freezing), Hypoxia and/or anoxia, Mineral nutrient excess and/or deficiency, Heavy metals and/or metalloids, Plant priming (chemical, biological, physiological, nanomaterial, biostimulant) approaches for improved stress protection, Viral, phytoplasma, bacterial and fungal plant-pathogen interactions. The journal welcomes basic and applied research articles, as well as review articles and short communications. All submitted manuscripts will be subject to a thorough peer-reviewing process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信