A new and general efficiency calibration methodology for Ge detectors using LabSOCS

IF 1.6 3区 物理与天体物理 Q2 NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
A. Barba-Lobo
{"title":"A new and general efficiency calibration methodology for Ge detectors using LabSOCS","authors":"A. Barba-Lobo","doi":"10.1016/j.radmeas.2025.107374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The measurement of natural and artificial radionuclides is really needed in many research fields such as radioecology, radiobiology, radiological protection, medical physics and environmental radioactivity. The gamma-ray spectrometry using Ge detectors has become one the most employed radiometric techniques, where a proper efficiency calibration based on the full-energy peak efficiency (<em>FEPE</em>) is essential for the measurement of radionuclides. To obtain the <em>FEPEs</em>, the use of simulation programs, especially LabSOCS, has become generalized. However, when obtaining the <em>FEPEs</em> by LabSOCS, the reproduction of each geometry is usually time consuming. Moreover, when using LabSOCS, there are important limitations regarding the chemical composition that is possible to specify for each sample. For these previous reasons, this study aims to develop a novel and general efficiency calibration methodology for Ge detectors using LabSOCS for cylindrical geometries. For this, a general analytical function was obtained for the simulated <em>FEPEs</em> for the calibration sample (<span><math><mrow><msub><mi>ε</mi><mi>c</mi></msub></mrow></math></span>, water in this case) depending on the sample thickness (<em>h</em>), internal geometry diameter (<em>d</em>) and gamma emission energy (<em>E</em><sub><em>γ</em></sub>), where a multiple fitting procedure was developed consisting in three steps: 1. <em>FEPEs</em> vs <em>h</em> (<em>h</em> = 5–50 mm), fixing <em>d</em> and <em>E</em><sub><em>γ</em></sub>, obtaining the parameters <em>p</em><sub><em>h</em></sub> from these fits, 2. <em>p</em><sub><em>h</em></sub> vs <em>d</em> (<em>d</em> = 7–70 mm), fixing <em>E</em><sub><em>γ</em></sub>, obtaining <em>p</em><sub><em>d</em></sub>, and 3. <em>p</em><sub><em>d</em></sub> vs <em>E</em><sub><em>γ</em></sub> (<em>E</em><sub><em>γ</em></sub> = 46–1460 keV), obtaining <span><math><mrow><msub><mi>p</mi><msub><mi>E</mi><mi>γ</mi></msub></msub></mrow></math></span>. For all the fits, the obtained <span><math><mrow><msubsup><mi>χ</mi><mi>R</mi><mn>2</mn></msubsup></mrow></math></span> values were less than the critical <span><math><mrow><msubsup><mi>χ</mi><mi>R</mi><mn>2</mn></msubsup></mrow></math></span> ones. Then, the general <span><math><mrow><msub><mi>ε</mi><mi>c</mi></msub><mrow><mo>(</mo><mrow><mi>h</mi><mo>,</mo><mi>d</mi><mo>,</mo><msub><mi>E</mi><mi>γ</mi></msub></mrow><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow></math></span> function was also obtained for any problem sample (<span><math><mrow><mi>ε</mi></mrow></math></span>) using an analytical function of the self-attenuation correction factor (<em>f</em><sub><em>a</em></sub>). The applicability range of the <em>f</em><sub><em>a</em></sub> function was comprehensively analyzed for a wide range of chemical compositions, apparent densities (<em>ρ</em>), <em>h</em>, <em>d</em>, and <em>E</em><sub><em>γ</em></sub>, comparing the results obtained by the <em>f</em><sub><em>a</em></sub> function and LabSOCS, finding that for 7 mm <span><math><mrow><mo>≤</mo></mrow></math></span> <em>d</em> <span><math><mrow><mo>≤</mo></mrow></math></span> 35 mm, the <em>f</em><sub><em>a</em></sub> function properly works for <em>h</em> &lt; 25 mm for any problem sample, while for <em>d</em> &gt; 35 mm, it properly does for <em>h</em> <span><math><mrow><mo>≤</mo></mrow></math></span> 25 mm. Moreover, the general <span><math><mrow><mi>ε</mi></mrow></math></span> function obtained in this study was externally and internally validated using reference and non-reference materials for a wide range of chemical compositions, <em>ρ</em>, <em>h</em>, <em>d</em>, and <em>E</em><sub><em>γ</em></sub> for both natural and artificial radionuclides.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21055,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Measurements","volume":"181 ","pages":"Article 107374"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Measurements","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350448725000034","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The measurement of natural and artificial radionuclides is really needed in many research fields such as radioecology, radiobiology, radiological protection, medical physics and environmental radioactivity. The gamma-ray spectrometry using Ge detectors has become one the most employed radiometric techniques, where a proper efficiency calibration based on the full-energy peak efficiency (FEPE) is essential for the measurement of radionuclides. To obtain the FEPEs, the use of simulation programs, especially LabSOCS, has become generalized. However, when obtaining the FEPEs by LabSOCS, the reproduction of each geometry is usually time consuming. Moreover, when using LabSOCS, there are important limitations regarding the chemical composition that is possible to specify for each sample. For these previous reasons, this study aims to develop a novel and general efficiency calibration methodology for Ge detectors using LabSOCS for cylindrical geometries. For this, a general analytical function was obtained for the simulated FEPEs for the calibration sample (εc, water in this case) depending on the sample thickness (h), internal geometry diameter (d) and gamma emission energy (Eγ), where a multiple fitting procedure was developed consisting in three steps: 1. FEPEs vs h (h = 5–50 mm), fixing d and Eγ, obtaining the parameters ph from these fits, 2. ph vs d (d = 7–70 mm), fixing Eγ, obtaining pd, and 3. pd vs Eγ (Eγ = 46–1460 keV), obtaining pEγ. For all the fits, the obtained χR2 values were less than the critical χR2 ones. Then, the general εc(h,d,Eγ) function was also obtained for any problem sample (ε) using an analytical function of the self-attenuation correction factor (fa). The applicability range of the fa function was comprehensively analyzed for a wide range of chemical compositions, apparent densities (ρ), h, d, and Eγ, comparing the results obtained by the fa function and LabSOCS, finding that for 7 mm d 35 mm, the fa function properly works for h < 25 mm for any problem sample, while for d > 35 mm, it properly does for h 25 mm. Moreover, the general ε function obtained in this study was externally and internally validated using reference and non-reference materials for a wide range of chemical compositions, ρ, h, d, and Eγ for both natural and artificial radionuclides.
一种新的通用的使用LabSOCS的锗探测器效率校准方法
在放射生态学、放射生物学、放射防护、医学物理学和环境放射性等许多研究领域都需要对天然和人工放射性核素进行测量。使用锗探测器的伽马射线能谱法已成为应用最广泛的辐射测量技术之一,其中基于全能量峰值效率(FEPE)的适当效率校准对于放射性核素的测量至关重要。为了获得fepe,使用仿真程序,特别是LabSOCS,已经变得普遍。然而,当通过LabSOCS获得FEPEs时,每个几何形状的再现通常是耗时的。此外,当使用LabSOCS时,对于每种样品可能指定的化学成分有重要的限制。基于上述原因,本研究旨在开发一种新的通用效率校准方法,用于使用LabSOCS进行圆柱形几何的锗探测器。为此,根据样品厚度(h)、内部几何直径(d)和伽马发射能量(e),得到了校准样品(εc,在本例中为水)的模拟FEPEs的一般解析函数,其中开发了一个多重拟合程序,包括三个步骤:1。FEPEs vs h (h = 5-50 mm),固定d和γ,从这些拟合得到参数ph, 2。ph vs d (d = 7-70 mm),固定Eγ,得到pd,pd vs Eγ (Eγ = 46-1460 keV),得到pEγ。所有拟合的χR2值均小于临界χR2值。然后,利用自衰减校正因子(fa)的解析函数,得到任意问题样本(ε)的一般εc(h,d,Eγ)函数。综合分析了fa函数对大范围化学成分、表观密度(ρ)、h、d和Eγ的适用范围,比较了fa函数和LabSOCS得到的结果,发现当7 mm≤d≤35 mm时,fa函数对h <适用;任何问题样品25mm,而d >;35mm,适用于h≤25mm。此外,本研究中获得的一般ε函数在外部和内部进行了验证,使用标准和非标准物质对广泛的化学成分,对天然和人工放射性核素的ρ, h, d和γ进行了验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radiation Measurements
Radiation Measurements 工程技术-核科学技术
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
116
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The journal seeks to publish papers that present advances in the following areas: spontaneous and stimulated luminescence (including scintillating materials, thermoluminescence, and optically stimulated luminescence); electron spin resonance of natural and synthetic materials; the physics, design and performance of radiation measurements (including computational modelling such as electronic transport simulations); the novel basic aspects of radiation measurement in medical physics. Studies of energy-transfer phenomena, track physics and microdosimetry are also of interest to the journal. Applications relevant to the journal, particularly where they present novel detection techniques, novel analytical approaches or novel materials, include: personal dosimetry (including dosimetric quantities, active/electronic and passive monitoring techniques for photon, neutron and charged-particle exposures); environmental dosimetry (including methodological advances and predictive models related to radon, but generally excluding local survey results of radon where the main aim is to establish the radiation risk to populations); cosmic and high-energy radiation measurements (including dosimetry, space radiation effects, and single event upsets); dosimetry-based archaeological and Quaternary dating; dosimetry-based approaches to thermochronometry; accident and retrospective dosimetry (including activation detectors), and dosimetry and measurements related to medical applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信