{"title":"A new and general efficiency calibration methodology for Ge detectors using LabSOCS","authors":"A. Barba-Lobo","doi":"10.1016/j.radmeas.2025.107374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The measurement of natural and artificial radionuclides is really needed in many research fields such as radioecology, radiobiology, radiological protection, medical physics and environmental radioactivity. The gamma-ray spectrometry using Ge detectors has become one the most employed radiometric techniques, where a proper efficiency calibration based on the full-energy peak efficiency (<em>FEPE</em>) is essential for the measurement of radionuclides. To obtain the <em>FEPEs</em>, the use of simulation programs, especially LabSOCS, has become generalized. However, when obtaining the <em>FEPEs</em> by LabSOCS, the reproduction of each geometry is usually time consuming. Moreover, when using LabSOCS, there are important limitations regarding the chemical composition that is possible to specify for each sample. For these previous reasons, this study aims to develop a novel and general efficiency calibration methodology for Ge detectors using LabSOCS for cylindrical geometries. For this, a general analytical function was obtained for the simulated <em>FEPEs</em> for the calibration sample (<span><math><mrow><msub><mi>ε</mi><mi>c</mi></msub></mrow></math></span>, water in this case) depending on the sample thickness (<em>h</em>), internal geometry diameter (<em>d</em>) and gamma emission energy (<em>E</em><sub><em>γ</em></sub>), where a multiple fitting procedure was developed consisting in three steps: 1. <em>FEPEs</em> vs <em>h</em> (<em>h</em> = 5–50 mm), fixing <em>d</em> and <em>E</em><sub><em>γ</em></sub>, obtaining the parameters <em>p</em><sub><em>h</em></sub> from these fits, 2. <em>p</em><sub><em>h</em></sub> vs <em>d</em> (<em>d</em> = 7–70 mm), fixing <em>E</em><sub><em>γ</em></sub>, obtaining <em>p</em><sub><em>d</em></sub>, and 3. <em>p</em><sub><em>d</em></sub> vs <em>E</em><sub><em>γ</em></sub> (<em>E</em><sub><em>γ</em></sub> = 46–1460 keV), obtaining <span><math><mrow><msub><mi>p</mi><msub><mi>E</mi><mi>γ</mi></msub></msub></mrow></math></span>. For all the fits, the obtained <span><math><mrow><msubsup><mi>χ</mi><mi>R</mi><mn>2</mn></msubsup></mrow></math></span> values were less than the critical <span><math><mrow><msubsup><mi>χ</mi><mi>R</mi><mn>2</mn></msubsup></mrow></math></span> ones. Then, the general <span><math><mrow><msub><mi>ε</mi><mi>c</mi></msub><mrow><mo>(</mo><mrow><mi>h</mi><mo>,</mo><mi>d</mi><mo>,</mo><msub><mi>E</mi><mi>γ</mi></msub></mrow><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow></math></span> function was also obtained for any problem sample (<span><math><mrow><mi>ε</mi></mrow></math></span>) using an analytical function of the self-attenuation correction factor (<em>f</em><sub><em>a</em></sub>). The applicability range of the <em>f</em><sub><em>a</em></sub> function was comprehensively analyzed for a wide range of chemical compositions, apparent densities (<em>ρ</em>), <em>h</em>, <em>d</em>, and <em>E</em><sub><em>γ</em></sub>, comparing the results obtained by the <em>f</em><sub><em>a</em></sub> function and LabSOCS, finding that for 7 mm <span><math><mrow><mo>≤</mo></mrow></math></span> <em>d</em> <span><math><mrow><mo>≤</mo></mrow></math></span> 35 mm, the <em>f</em><sub><em>a</em></sub> function properly works for <em>h</em> < 25 mm for any problem sample, while for <em>d</em> > 35 mm, it properly does for <em>h</em> <span><math><mrow><mo>≤</mo></mrow></math></span> 25 mm. Moreover, the general <span><math><mrow><mi>ε</mi></mrow></math></span> function obtained in this study was externally and internally validated using reference and non-reference materials for a wide range of chemical compositions, <em>ρ</em>, <em>h</em>, <em>d</em>, and <em>E</em><sub><em>γ</em></sub> for both natural and artificial radionuclides.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21055,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Measurements","volume":"181 ","pages":"Article 107374"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Measurements","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350448725000034","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The measurement of natural and artificial radionuclides is really needed in many research fields such as radioecology, radiobiology, radiological protection, medical physics and environmental radioactivity. The gamma-ray spectrometry using Ge detectors has become one the most employed radiometric techniques, where a proper efficiency calibration based on the full-energy peak efficiency (FEPE) is essential for the measurement of radionuclides. To obtain the FEPEs, the use of simulation programs, especially LabSOCS, has become generalized. However, when obtaining the FEPEs by LabSOCS, the reproduction of each geometry is usually time consuming. Moreover, when using LabSOCS, there are important limitations regarding the chemical composition that is possible to specify for each sample. For these previous reasons, this study aims to develop a novel and general efficiency calibration methodology for Ge detectors using LabSOCS for cylindrical geometries. For this, a general analytical function was obtained for the simulated FEPEs for the calibration sample (, water in this case) depending on the sample thickness (h), internal geometry diameter (d) and gamma emission energy (Eγ), where a multiple fitting procedure was developed consisting in three steps: 1. FEPEs vs h (h = 5–50 mm), fixing d and Eγ, obtaining the parameters ph from these fits, 2. ph vs d (d = 7–70 mm), fixing Eγ, obtaining pd, and 3. pd vs Eγ (Eγ = 46–1460 keV), obtaining . For all the fits, the obtained values were less than the critical ones. Then, the general function was also obtained for any problem sample () using an analytical function of the self-attenuation correction factor (fa). The applicability range of the fa function was comprehensively analyzed for a wide range of chemical compositions, apparent densities (ρ), h, d, and Eγ, comparing the results obtained by the fa function and LabSOCS, finding that for 7 mm d 35 mm, the fa function properly works for h < 25 mm for any problem sample, while for d > 35 mm, it properly does for h 25 mm. Moreover, the general function obtained in this study was externally and internally validated using reference and non-reference materials for a wide range of chemical compositions, ρ, h, d, and Eγ for both natural and artificial radionuclides.
期刊介绍:
The journal seeks to publish papers that present advances in the following areas: spontaneous and stimulated luminescence (including scintillating materials, thermoluminescence, and optically stimulated luminescence); electron spin resonance of natural and synthetic materials; the physics, design and performance of radiation measurements (including computational modelling such as electronic transport simulations); the novel basic aspects of radiation measurement in medical physics. Studies of energy-transfer phenomena, track physics and microdosimetry are also of interest to the journal.
Applications relevant to the journal, particularly where they present novel detection techniques, novel analytical approaches or novel materials, include: personal dosimetry (including dosimetric quantities, active/electronic and passive monitoring techniques for photon, neutron and charged-particle exposures); environmental dosimetry (including methodological advances and predictive models related to radon, but generally excluding local survey results of radon where the main aim is to establish the radiation risk to populations); cosmic and high-energy radiation measurements (including dosimetry, space radiation effects, and single event upsets); dosimetry-based archaeological and Quaternary dating; dosimetry-based approaches to thermochronometry; accident and retrospective dosimetry (including activation detectors), and dosimetry and measurements related to medical applications.