A correction method between sample mass and EPR intensity in radiation dose reconstruction

IF 1.6 3区 物理与天体物理 Q2 NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Shuchen Wang , Zhenlin Jia , Desheng Xue , Baotian Pan
{"title":"A correction method between sample mass and EPR intensity in radiation dose reconstruction","authors":"Shuchen Wang ,&nbsp;Zhenlin Jia ,&nbsp;Desheng Xue ,&nbsp;Baotian Pan","doi":"10.1016/j.radmeas.2024.107364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) radiation dose reconstruction, maintaining a consistent mass across a series of aliquots is crucial. However, due to sample limitations or experimental uncertainties, achieving this consistency may not always be possible. To address these challenges and optimize experimental processes, a theoretical model (<span><math><mrow><mi>I</mi><mo>−</mo><mi>M</mi></mrow></math></span> model) was developed to describe the relationship between EPR intensity emanating from a TE<sub>011</sub> mode cylindrical resonant cavity and sample mass. The model was verified using the TEMPO paramagnetic standard and quartz, a common material employed in dosimetry reconstructions. Based on this model and the evaluation of the modulation magnetic field uniformity, correction methods for EPR intensity in solid powder samples were proposed. The model reveals that the non-uniformity of the microwave magnetic field distribution in the resonant cavity leads to spatial inconsistency in sample responses, resulting in a non-linear relationship between EPR intensity and sample mass, characterized by a “sinusoidal + linear” pattern. The parameter <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>I</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>cen.</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> is recommended as a metric for EPR intensity, as it intrinsically characterizes the spin concentration of the sample regardless of sample mass, thereby enhancing the accuracy of quantitative EPR measurements and equivalent dose evaluation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21055,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Measurements","volume":"181 ","pages":"Article 107364"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Measurements","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350448724003123","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) radiation dose reconstruction, maintaining a consistent mass across a series of aliquots is crucial. However, due to sample limitations or experimental uncertainties, achieving this consistency may not always be possible. To address these challenges and optimize experimental processes, a theoretical model (IM model) was developed to describe the relationship between EPR intensity emanating from a TE011 mode cylindrical resonant cavity and sample mass. The model was verified using the TEMPO paramagnetic standard and quartz, a common material employed in dosimetry reconstructions. Based on this model and the evaluation of the modulation magnetic field uniformity, correction methods for EPR intensity in solid powder samples were proposed. The model reveals that the non-uniformity of the microwave magnetic field distribution in the resonant cavity leads to spatial inconsistency in sample responses, resulting in a non-linear relationship between EPR intensity and sample mass, characterized by a “sinusoidal + linear” pattern. The parameter Icen. is recommended as a metric for EPR intensity, as it intrinsically characterizes the spin concentration of the sample regardless of sample mass, thereby enhancing the accuracy of quantitative EPR measurements and equivalent dose evaluation.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radiation Measurements
Radiation Measurements 工程技术-核科学技术
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
116
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The journal seeks to publish papers that present advances in the following areas: spontaneous and stimulated luminescence (including scintillating materials, thermoluminescence, and optically stimulated luminescence); electron spin resonance of natural and synthetic materials; the physics, design and performance of radiation measurements (including computational modelling such as electronic transport simulations); the novel basic aspects of radiation measurement in medical physics. Studies of energy-transfer phenomena, track physics and microdosimetry are also of interest to the journal. Applications relevant to the journal, particularly where they present novel detection techniques, novel analytical approaches or novel materials, include: personal dosimetry (including dosimetric quantities, active/electronic and passive monitoring techniques for photon, neutron and charged-particle exposures); environmental dosimetry (including methodological advances and predictive models related to radon, but generally excluding local survey results of radon where the main aim is to establish the radiation risk to populations); cosmic and high-energy radiation measurements (including dosimetry, space radiation effects, and single event upsets); dosimetry-based archaeological and Quaternary dating; dosimetry-based approaches to thermochronometry; accident and retrospective dosimetry (including activation detectors), and dosimetry and measurements related to medical applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信