Comparative assessment of hemostasis in septic patients and healthy controls using standard coagulation tests and whole-blood thromboelastometry

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 HEMATOLOGY
Ecaterina Scarlatescu , Paul Y. Kim , Sergey P. Marchenko , Dana R. Tomescu
{"title":"Comparative assessment of hemostasis in septic patients and healthy controls using standard coagulation tests and whole-blood thromboelastometry","authors":"Ecaterina Scarlatescu ,&nbsp;Paul Y. Kim ,&nbsp;Sergey P. Marchenko ,&nbsp;Dana R. Tomescu","doi":"10.1016/j.transci.2025.104082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Sepsis is associated with dysregulation of procoagulant, anticoagulant, and fibrinolytic pathways.</div></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><div>To compare the measurements of coagulation activation, clot formation, stabilization, and lysis between rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) and standard coagulation tests (SCTs) on patients with early sepsis (SP) and healthy controls (HC).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This observational study included 30 SP and 30 HC. At study inclusion, SCTs and ROTEM analyses were conducted. A modified ROTEM with exogenous tPA was used to investigate fibrinolysis resistance.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>SP had longer prothrombin time, higher fibrinogen levels and lower platelet count compared to HC. On ROTEM, clotting initiation was longer in SP than in HC but median clotting time maintained within reference ranges. SP had higher maximum velocity of clot formation, clot firmness, elasticity, and platelet component than HC. Clot lysis indices (CLI) were higher in EXTEM and APTEM (without and with added tPA) in SP compared to HC. The difference in CLI between APTEM and EXTEM was lower for both native and tPA-spiked samples in SP compared with HC.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>While SCTs suggest SP are hypocoagulable, VET revealed normal coagulation initiation in more than 80 % of SP. Compared to HC, SP had increased clot propagation, firmness and elasticity, and decreased platelet-mediated clot retraction and lysis. In sepsis, VET provide more comprehensive information about hemostatic changes than SCTs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49422,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion and Apheresis Science","volume":"64 2","pages":"Article 104082"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion and Apheresis Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1473050225000163","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Sepsis is associated with dysregulation of procoagulant, anticoagulant, and fibrinolytic pathways.

Aims

To compare the measurements of coagulation activation, clot formation, stabilization, and lysis between rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) and standard coagulation tests (SCTs) on patients with early sepsis (SP) and healthy controls (HC).

Methods

This observational study included 30 SP and 30 HC. At study inclusion, SCTs and ROTEM analyses were conducted. A modified ROTEM with exogenous tPA was used to investigate fibrinolysis resistance.

Results

SP had longer prothrombin time, higher fibrinogen levels and lower platelet count compared to HC. On ROTEM, clotting initiation was longer in SP than in HC but median clotting time maintained within reference ranges. SP had higher maximum velocity of clot formation, clot firmness, elasticity, and platelet component than HC. Clot lysis indices (CLI) were higher in EXTEM and APTEM (without and with added tPA) in SP compared to HC. The difference in CLI between APTEM and EXTEM was lower for both native and tPA-spiked samples in SP compared with HC.

Conclusions

While SCTs suggest SP are hypocoagulable, VET revealed normal coagulation initiation in more than 80 % of SP. Compared to HC, SP had increased clot propagation, firmness and elasticity, and decreased platelet-mediated clot retraction and lysis. In sepsis, VET provide more comprehensive information about hemostatic changes than SCTs.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.30%
发文量
181
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Transfusion and Apheresis Science brings comprehensive and up-to-date information to physicians and health care professionals involved in the rapidly changing fields of transfusion medicine, hemostasis and apheresis. The journal presents original articles relating to scientific and clinical studies in the areas of immunohematology, transfusion practice, bleeding and thrombotic disorders and both therapeutic and donor apheresis including hematopoietic stem cells. Topics covered include the collection and processing of blood, compatibility testing and guidelines for the use of blood products, as well as screening for and transmission of blood-borne diseases. All areas of apheresis - therapeutic and collection - are also addressed. We would like to specifically encourage allied health professionals in this area to submit manuscripts that relate to improved patient and donor care, technical aspects and educational issues. Transfusion and Apheresis Science features a "Theme" section which includes, in each issue, a group of papers designed to review a specific topic of current importance in transfusion and hemostasis for the discussion of topical issues specific to apheresis and focuses on the operators'' viewpoint. Another section is "What''s Happening" which provides informal reporting of activities in the field. In addition, brief case reports and Letters to the Editor, as well as reviews of meetings and events of general interest, and a listing of recent patents make the journal a complete source of information for practitioners of transfusion, hemostasis and apheresis science. Immediate dissemination of important information is ensured by the commitment of Transfusion and Apheresis Science to rapid publication of both symposia and submitted papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信