Chiara Maria Cocchiara , Giovanna Lo Nigro , Paolo Roma , Antonio Ragusa
{"title":"Project and knowledge management at European public space agencies: The need for a three-dimensional project management office","authors":"Chiara Maria Cocchiara , Giovanna Lo Nigro , Paolo Roma , Antonio Ragusa","doi":"10.1016/j.spacepol.2024.101639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Space agencies are continuously developing new space missions, each of which undergoes a long development cycle, from the feasibility study to routine operations and disposal, as per the European Cooperation for Space Standardization (ECSS), the body responsible for developing and maintaining a set of standards for the space industry in Europe. Each mission is a stand-alone project, where the development cycle starts every time from scratch, with new resources, technologies, and requirements, applying the same (tailored) standards, but with limited usage of lessons learnt from earlier or parallel projects. In this article, we analyse typical project management and knowledge management approaches adopted by public space agencies, making use of a relevant case study in Europe. From the results of our case study analysis, we propose a three-dimensional Project Management Office (PMO) governance, explaining how this novel approach helps address limitations and challenges of the current approaches when dealing with multiple complex projects, such as space missions. With the PMO defined as an organisational body or entity assigned various responsibilities, the authors focus on three specific areas, namely, Strategy, Resources, and Knowledge, as three key drivers that can improve the current management of projects of the organization.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45924,"journal":{"name":"Space Policy","volume":"70 ","pages":"Article 101639"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Space Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0265964624000304","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Space agencies are continuously developing new space missions, each of which undergoes a long development cycle, from the feasibility study to routine operations and disposal, as per the European Cooperation for Space Standardization (ECSS), the body responsible for developing and maintaining a set of standards for the space industry in Europe. Each mission is a stand-alone project, where the development cycle starts every time from scratch, with new resources, technologies, and requirements, applying the same (tailored) standards, but with limited usage of lessons learnt from earlier or parallel projects. In this article, we analyse typical project management and knowledge management approaches adopted by public space agencies, making use of a relevant case study in Europe. From the results of our case study analysis, we propose a three-dimensional Project Management Office (PMO) governance, explaining how this novel approach helps address limitations and challenges of the current approaches when dealing with multiple complex projects, such as space missions. With the PMO defined as an organisational body or entity assigned various responsibilities, the authors focus on three specific areas, namely, Strategy, Resources, and Knowledge, as three key drivers that can improve the current management of projects of the organization.
期刊介绍:
Space Policy is an international, interdisciplinary journal which draws on the fields of international relations, economics, history, aerospace studies, security studies, development studies, political science and ethics to provide discussion and analysis of space activities in their political, economic, industrial, legal, cultural and social contexts. Alongside full-length papers, which are subject to a double-blind peer review system, the journal publishes opinion pieces, case studies and short reports and, in so doing, it aims to provide a forum for the exchange of ideas and opinions and a means by which authors can alert policy makers and international organizations to their views. Space Policy is also a journal of record, reproducing, in whole or part, official documents such as treaties, space agency plans or government reports relevant to the space community. Views expressed in the journal are not necessarily those of the editors or members of the editorial board.