Unraveling trends and disparities in acute myocardial infarction-related mortality among adult cancer patients: A nationwide CDC-WONDER analysis (1999–2020)

IF 1.9 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Humza Saeed , Uzair Majeed , Minahil Iqbal , Sufyan Shahid , Anum Touseef Hussain , Hammad Ahmad Iftikhar , Momina Riaz Siddiqui , Iftikhar Ali Ch , Salman Khalid , Naeem Khan Tahirkheli
{"title":"Unraveling trends and disparities in acute myocardial infarction-related mortality among adult cancer patients: A nationwide CDC-WONDER analysis (1999–2020)","authors":"Humza Saeed ,&nbsp;Uzair Majeed ,&nbsp;Minahil Iqbal ,&nbsp;Sufyan Shahid ,&nbsp;Anum Touseef Hussain ,&nbsp;Hammad Ahmad Iftikhar ,&nbsp;Momina Riaz Siddiqui ,&nbsp;Iftikhar Ali Ch ,&nbsp;Salman Khalid ,&nbsp;Naeem Khan Tahirkheli","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcrp.2025.200371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Cancer patients are at an increased risk for the incidence and complications of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) due to shared risk factors and treatment-related adverse effects. Mortality trends for AMI-related deaths in adult cancer patients in the U.S. remain unexplored.</div></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><div>This study used CDC WONDER data for death certificates from 1999 to 2020, identifying U.S. adults (≥25 years) with cancer (ICD-10: C00-D49) who died of AMI (ICD-10: I21) as the underlying cause. Age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) and annual percent changes (APCs) were calculated and stratified by gender, age, race, and geographic location.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Between 1999 and 2020, there were 109,462 AMI-related deaths in adult cancer patients. The AAMR decreased from 4.3 per 100,000 in 1999 to 1.4 in 2020. A significant decline occurred from 1999 to 2015 (APC: 6.65; 95 % CI: 6.95 to −6.40; p &lt; 0.001), followed by a stable trend from 2015 to 2020 (APC: 1.36; 95 % CI: 2.69 to 0.91; p = 0.152). Men had higher AAMRs than women (3.5 vs. 1.5). AAMRs were highest in older adults (10.5) compared to middle-aged (0.7) and young adults (0.1). Racial disparities showed the highest AAMRs in non-Hispanic (NH) Black patients (2.7), followed by NH Whites (2.4), NH American Indian/Alaska Native (1.6), Hispanic/Latino (1.3), and NH Asian/Pacific Islander (1.1). Non-metropolitan areas had higher AAMRs than metropolitan areas (2.8 vs. 2.2).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This analysis highlights a significant decline in AMI-related mortality among cancer patients in the U.S., with persistent disparities by gender, age, race and geographical location.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":29726,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cardiology Cardiovascular Risk and Prevention","volume":"24 ","pages":"Article 200371"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cardiology Cardiovascular Risk and Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772487525000091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Cancer patients are at an increased risk for the incidence and complications of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) due to shared risk factors and treatment-related adverse effects. Mortality trends for AMI-related deaths in adult cancer patients in the U.S. remain unexplored.

Methodology

This study used CDC WONDER data for death certificates from 1999 to 2020, identifying U.S. adults (≥25 years) with cancer (ICD-10: C00-D49) who died of AMI (ICD-10: I21) as the underlying cause. Age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) and annual percent changes (APCs) were calculated and stratified by gender, age, race, and geographic location.

Results

Between 1999 and 2020, there were 109,462 AMI-related deaths in adult cancer patients. The AAMR decreased from 4.3 per 100,000 in 1999 to 1.4 in 2020. A significant decline occurred from 1999 to 2015 (APC: 6.65; 95 % CI: 6.95 to −6.40; p < 0.001), followed by a stable trend from 2015 to 2020 (APC: 1.36; 95 % CI: 2.69 to 0.91; p = 0.152). Men had higher AAMRs than women (3.5 vs. 1.5). AAMRs were highest in older adults (10.5) compared to middle-aged (0.7) and young adults (0.1). Racial disparities showed the highest AAMRs in non-Hispanic (NH) Black patients (2.7), followed by NH Whites (2.4), NH American Indian/Alaska Native (1.6), Hispanic/Latino (1.3), and NH Asian/Pacific Islander (1.1). Non-metropolitan areas had higher AAMRs than metropolitan areas (2.8 vs. 2.2).

Conclusions

This analysis highlights a significant decline in AMI-related mortality among cancer patients in the U.S., with persistent disparities by gender, age, race and geographical location.

Abstract Image

成人癌症患者急性心肌梗死相关死亡率的趋势和差异:一项全国性的CDC-WONDER分析(1999-2020)
背景:由于共同的危险因素和治疗相关的不良反应,癌症患者急性心肌梗死(AMI)的发生率和并发症的风险增加。美国成人癌症患者ami相关死亡的死亡率趋势仍未研究。方法:本研究使用1999年至2020年CDC WONDER死亡证明数据,确定美国成年人(≥25岁)癌症(ICD-10: C00-D49)死于AMI (ICD-10: I21)是潜在原因。计算年龄调整死亡率(AAMRs)和年变化百分比(APCs),并按性别、年龄、种族和地理位置分层。结果1999年至2020年间,成人癌症患者中有109,462例ami相关死亡。AAMR从1999年的4.3 / 10万下降到2020年的1.4 / 10万。1999 - 2015年显著下降(APC: 6.65;95% CI: 6.95 ~ - 6.40;p & lt;0.001),其次是2015 - 2020年的稳定趋势(APC: 1.36;95% CI: 2.69 ~ 0.91;p = 0.152)。男性的aamr高于女性(3.5比1.5)。与中年人(0.7)和年轻人(0.1)相比,老年人(10.5)的aamr最高。种族差异显示,非西班牙裔黑人患者的aamr最高(2.7),其次是NH白人(2.4),NH美洲印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民(1.6),西班牙裔/拉丁裔(1.3)和NH亚洲/太平洋岛民(1.1)。非都市地区的aamr高于都市地区(2.8比2.2)。结论:该分析强调了美国癌症患者ami相关死亡率的显著下降,但存在性别、年龄、种族和地理位置的持续差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
72 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信