Modelling of hurricane Dorian via the implementation of Wave Boundary Layer Model (WBLM) within the OpenIFS

IF 3.1 3区 地球科学 Q2 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
Nefeli Makrygianni , Shunqi Pan , Michaela Bray , Jean R. Bidlot
{"title":"Modelling of hurricane Dorian via the implementation of Wave Boundary Layer Model (WBLM) within the OpenIFS","authors":"Nefeli Makrygianni ,&nbsp;Shunqi Pan ,&nbsp;Michaela Bray ,&nbsp;Jean R. Bidlot","doi":"10.1016/j.ocemod.2024.102469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>For over three decades numerous studies have tried to understand the processes and impacts of air–sea interactions on the atmosphere and oceans, particularly in predicting winds and waves under tropical cyclone conditions. Literature has highlighted the critical role of momentum transfer, with various parameterisations proposed for the momentum fluxes, through the drag coefficient (<span><math><msub><mrow><mi>C</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>d</mi></mrow></msub></math></span>) and the roughness (<span><math><msub><mrow><mi>z</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>0</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>). However, accurate predictions still remain a significant challenge. Recently, Du et al. (2017,2019) proposed a comprehensive calculation of the source input function using a Wave Boundary Layer Model (WBLM). However, their study used a standalone model rather than a coupled system. Given the established significance of two-way wind-wave systems (Janssen, 1991), this study implements the WBLM within a coupled model (OpenIFS), to evaluate its impact and discuss the potential and limitations of the method. Numerical simulations were conducted using the WBLM scheme for a selected tropical cyclone, with results compared against in-situ buoy measurements and satellite altimeter data. Furthermore, the new approach’s results were compared with outputs using the default, well-established source input function of OpenIFS (Janssen et al., 1989; Janssen, 1991) to further assess its effectiveness. The findings suggest that the WBLM tends to reduce the commonly overestimated drag and Charnock coefficients. However, comparisons with in-situ observations indicate that the new approach requires substantial refinements to improve wind and wave predictions, since there are cases that the WBLM scheme under-performs the default scheme. This discrepancy may be attributed to the calculation of high-frequency impacts on momentum exchanges.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19457,"journal":{"name":"Ocean Modelling","volume":"194 ","pages":"Article 102469"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocean Modelling","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1463500324001550","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For over three decades numerous studies have tried to understand the processes and impacts of air–sea interactions on the atmosphere and oceans, particularly in predicting winds and waves under tropical cyclone conditions. Literature has highlighted the critical role of momentum transfer, with various parameterisations proposed for the momentum fluxes, through the drag coefficient (Cd) and the roughness (z0). However, accurate predictions still remain a significant challenge. Recently, Du et al. (2017,2019) proposed a comprehensive calculation of the source input function using a Wave Boundary Layer Model (WBLM). However, their study used a standalone model rather than a coupled system. Given the established significance of two-way wind-wave systems (Janssen, 1991), this study implements the WBLM within a coupled model (OpenIFS), to evaluate its impact and discuss the potential and limitations of the method. Numerical simulations were conducted using the WBLM scheme for a selected tropical cyclone, with results compared against in-situ buoy measurements and satellite altimeter data. Furthermore, the new approach’s results were compared with outputs using the default, well-established source input function of OpenIFS (Janssen et al., 1989; Janssen, 1991) to further assess its effectiveness. The findings suggest that the WBLM tends to reduce the commonly overestimated drag and Charnock coefficients. However, comparisons with in-situ observations indicate that the new approach requires substantial refinements to improve wind and wave predictions, since there are cases that the WBLM scheme under-performs the default scheme. This discrepancy may be attributed to the calculation of high-frequency impacts on momentum exchanges.
利用OpenIFS中的波浪边界层模型(WBLM)对飓风多里安进行模拟
三十多年来,许多研究试图了解海气相互作用对大气和海洋的过程和影响,特别是在预测热带气旋条件下的风和波方面。文献强调了动量传递的关键作用,通过阻力系数(Cd)和粗糙度(z0)提出了动量通量的各种参数化。然而,准确的预测仍然是一个重大挑战。最近,Du等人(2017,2019)提出了使用波边界层模型(WBLM)对源输入函数进行综合计算的方法。然而,他们的研究使用了一个独立的模型,而不是一个耦合的系统。鉴于双向风波系统的既定意义(Janssen, 1991),本研究在耦合模型(OpenIFS)中实现了WBLM,以评估其影响并讨论该方法的潜力和局限性。采用WBLM方案对选定的热带气旋进行了数值模拟,并将结果与现场浮标测量和卫星高度计数据进行了比较。此外,将新方法的结果与使用OpenIFS默认的、完善的源输入函数的输出进行比较(Janssen等人,1989;Janssen, 1991)进一步评估其有效性。研究结果表明,WBLM倾向于降低通常被高估的阻力和Charnock系数。然而,与现场观测结果的比较表明,新方法需要大量改进以提高风浪预报,因为在某些情况下,WBLM方案的表现不如默认方案。这种差异可能归因于对动量交换的高频影响的计算。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ocean Modelling
Ocean Modelling 地学-海洋学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
9.40%
发文量
86
审稿时长
19.6 weeks
期刊介绍: The main objective of Ocean Modelling is to provide rapid communication between those interested in ocean modelling, whether through direct observation, or through analytical, numerical or laboratory models, and including interactions between physical and biogeochemical or biological phenomena. Because of the intimate links between ocean and atmosphere, involvement of scientists interested in influences of either medium on the other is welcome. The journal has a wide scope and includes ocean-atmosphere interaction in various forms as well as pure ocean results. In addition to primary peer-reviewed papers, the journal provides review papers, preliminary communications, and discussions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信