{"title":"Identification of some wooden materials used in Bam world heritage site","authors":"Danial Harandi, Samaneh Almaszadeh Allahabadi","doi":"10.1016/j.jasrep.2024.104948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Arg-e-Bam is undoubtedly the largest earthen complex in Iran, if not the world. In Bam Citadel, in addition to earthen materials, wood was extensively used by traditional architects across various historical periods. A combination of microscopic and macroscopic techniques was employed to identify ten wood samples collected from various parts of Arg-e-Bam. Thin wood slides were prepared for wood identification and quantitative analysis using transmitted light microscopy and ImageJ software.</div><div>The oldest specimen, obtained from the lower layer of the eastern entrance of the governor’s residence and attributed to the Parthian period (247 BCE to 224 CE), was identified as palm wood. Furthermore, the identification of four palm wood samples in the building structure of the governor complex, dating to the Safavid period (1501<strong>–</strong>1736 CE) indicates the widespread use of palm tree trunks by architects of this period. Additionally, <em>Juglans regia</em> L. was identified in the entrance door of the building from the Safavid period. The use of <em>Populus</em> spp. and <em>Tamarix</em> spp. as a local wood materials in south of Iran in the construction of buildings demonstrates the knowledge of the architects of the Zand (1751<strong>–</strong>1794 CE) and Qajar (1796<strong>–</strong>1925 CE) periods by utilizing available native wood materials.</div><div>The identification of <em>Tectona grandis</em> L. (teak) wood as a non-native species in Iran demonstrates the importation of timber through historical trade networks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48150,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports","volume":"61 ","pages":"Article 104948"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352409X24005765","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Arg-e-Bam is undoubtedly the largest earthen complex in Iran, if not the world. In Bam Citadel, in addition to earthen materials, wood was extensively used by traditional architects across various historical periods. A combination of microscopic and macroscopic techniques was employed to identify ten wood samples collected from various parts of Arg-e-Bam. Thin wood slides were prepared for wood identification and quantitative analysis using transmitted light microscopy and ImageJ software.
The oldest specimen, obtained from the lower layer of the eastern entrance of the governor’s residence and attributed to the Parthian period (247 BCE to 224 CE), was identified as palm wood. Furthermore, the identification of four palm wood samples in the building structure of the governor complex, dating to the Safavid period (1501–1736 CE) indicates the widespread use of palm tree trunks by architects of this period. Additionally, Juglans regia L. was identified in the entrance door of the building from the Safavid period. The use of Populus spp. and Tamarix spp. as a local wood materials in south of Iran in the construction of buildings demonstrates the knowledge of the architects of the Zand (1751–1794 CE) and Qajar (1796–1925 CE) periods by utilizing available native wood materials.
The identification of Tectona grandis L. (teak) wood as a non-native species in Iran demonstrates the importation of timber through historical trade networks.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports is aimed at archaeologists and scientists engaged with the application of scientific techniques and methodologies to all areas of archaeology. The journal focuses on the results of the application of scientific methods to archaeological problems and debates. It will provide a forum for reviews and scientific debate of issues in scientific archaeology and their impact in the wider subject. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports will publish papers of excellent archaeological science, with regional or wider interest. This will include case studies, reviews and short papers where an established scientific technique sheds light on archaeological questions and debates.