Low back demands from assisting a patient with an unexpected loss of balance

IF 1.4 3区 医学 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Jacob J. Banks, Jie Zhou, Chelsea O. Riehle, Neal E. Wiggermann
{"title":"Low back demands from assisting a patient with an unexpected loss of balance","authors":"Jacob J. Banks,&nbsp;Jie Zhou,&nbsp;Chelsea O. Riehle,&nbsp;Neal E. Wiggermann","doi":"10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2025.106448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>To combat the high incidence of lower back musculoskeletal injuries in healthcare workers, it is important to identify potentially injurious tasks. Although risk of injury has been estimated for many clinical tasks, assisting a patient following an unexpected loss of balance or sudden fall has not been assessed. This study aimed to quantify the lower back forces of healthcare workers when assisting a patient from a standing loss of balance.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Peak L5/S1 intervertebral joint forces were estimated from thirteen healthcare workers in a laboratory setting as they assisted a patient from a standing loss of balance to a nearby wheelchair. The patient was a healthy male (64 kg) who simulated a loss of balance by buckling at the knees. An additional condition with 18 % of the patient's body weight unloaded was also tested.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>In a minority of trials, lower back demands exceeded ergonomic guidelines of 3400 and 1000 N for compression and shear, respectively. Patient body weight affected both compression and resultant shear forces (<em>p</em>-values &lt; .001).</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>The lower back demands when assisting a 64-kg patient during a simulated loss of balance did not consistently exceed ergonomic safety guidelines. However, the results imply a high-risk task for heavier patients in simulated settings, or potentially all patients in realistic clinical settings. Several experimental design considerations and limitations may have created a best-case scenario that underestimated the lack of injury risk during the task studied. Use of safe patient handling and mobility equipment is advisable to minimize risk when ambulating patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50992,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Biomechanics","volume":"122 ","pages":"Article 106448"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268003325000208","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

To combat the high incidence of lower back musculoskeletal injuries in healthcare workers, it is important to identify potentially injurious tasks. Although risk of injury has been estimated for many clinical tasks, assisting a patient following an unexpected loss of balance or sudden fall has not been assessed. This study aimed to quantify the lower back forces of healthcare workers when assisting a patient from a standing loss of balance.

Methods

Peak L5/S1 intervertebral joint forces were estimated from thirteen healthcare workers in a laboratory setting as they assisted a patient from a standing loss of balance to a nearby wheelchair. The patient was a healthy male (64 kg) who simulated a loss of balance by buckling at the knees. An additional condition with 18 % of the patient's body weight unloaded was also tested.

Findings

In a minority of trials, lower back demands exceeded ergonomic guidelines of 3400 and 1000 N for compression and shear, respectively. Patient body weight affected both compression and resultant shear forces (p-values < .001).

Interpretation

The lower back demands when assisting a 64-kg patient during a simulated loss of balance did not consistently exceed ergonomic safety guidelines. However, the results imply a high-risk task for heavier patients in simulated settings, or potentially all patients in realistic clinical settings. Several experimental design considerations and limitations may have created a best-case scenario that underestimated the lack of injury risk during the task studied. Use of safe patient handling and mobility equipment is advisable to minimize risk when ambulating patients.
帮助意外失去平衡的病人时,腰背的需求
背景:为了对抗高发病率的下背部肌肉骨骼损伤的医护人员,重要的是要确定潜在的伤害任务。虽然对许多临床任务的伤害风险进行了估计,但对意外失去平衡或突然跌倒的患者的协助尚未进行评估。本研究旨在量化卫生保健工作者在协助患者站立失去平衡时的下背部力量。方法对13名卫生保健工作者在实验室环境中协助一名站立失去平衡的患者到附近轮椅上时进行L5/S1椎间关节力的估计。患者是一名健康男性(64公斤),通过弯曲膝盖来模拟失去平衡。另外还测试了患者体重18%的负荷。在少数试验中,下背部的压力分别超过了人体工程学指导值3400和1000 N的压缩和剪切。患者体重影响压缩力和合成剪切力(p值<;措施)。解释:在模拟失去平衡时,辅助64公斤患者的下背部需求并未始终超出人体工程学安全指南。然而,结果表明,在模拟环境中,对于体重较重的患者,或者在现实临床环境中潜在的所有患者,这是一项高风险的任务。一些实验设计的考虑和限制可能创造了一个最好的情况,低估了在研究任务中缺乏伤害风险。建议使用安全的病人处理和移动设备,以尽量减少走动病人时的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Biomechanics
Clinical Biomechanics 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
189
审稿时长
12.3 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Biomechanics is an international multidisciplinary journal of biomechanics with a focus on medical and clinical applications of new knowledge in the field. The science of biomechanics helps explain the causes of cell, tissue, organ and body system disorders, and supports clinicians in the diagnosis, prognosis and evaluation of treatment methods and technologies. Clinical Biomechanics aims to strengthen the links between laboratory and clinic by publishing cutting-edge biomechanics research which helps to explain the causes of injury and disease, and which provides evidence contributing to improved clinical management. A rigorous peer review system is employed and every attempt is made to process and publish top-quality papers promptly. Clinical Biomechanics explores all facets of body system, organ, tissue and cell biomechanics, with an emphasis on medical and clinical applications of the basic science aspects. The role of basic science is therefore recognized in a medical or clinical context. The readership of the journal closely reflects its multi-disciplinary contents, being a balance of scientists, engineers and clinicians. The contents are in the form of research papers, brief reports, review papers and correspondence, whilst special interest issues and supplements are published from time to time. Disciplines covered include biomechanics and mechanobiology at all scales, bioengineering and use of tissue engineering and biomaterials for clinical applications, biophysics, as well as biomechanical aspects of medical robotics, ergonomics, physical and occupational therapeutics and rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信