Recycled cross-laminated timber as a low environmental impact alternative to virgin material: Latvia case study

IF 6.5 2区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Peteris Vasuks , Ilze Vamza , Megija Valtere , Tereza Bezrucko , Dagnija Blumberga
{"title":"Recycled cross-laminated timber as a low environmental impact alternative to virgin material: Latvia case study","authors":"Peteris Vasuks ,&nbsp;Ilze Vamza ,&nbsp;Megija Valtere ,&nbsp;Tereza Bezrucko ,&nbsp;Dagnija Blumberga","doi":"10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e04094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Building with wood has become more popular and so has the circularity concept and carbon storage in products. This study aims to analyse the life cycle impacts of cross-laminated timber (CLT) recycling. Functional unit of 1 m<sup>3</sup> was chosen for the CLT and recycled cross-laminated timber (ReCLT) comparison. For the life cycle assessment, the ReCiPe methodology was used allowing to calculate midpoint and endpoint accumulated impacts of both ReCLT and CLT, therefore allowing for the best comparison. Overall, the ReCLT showed significantly reduced environmental impacts in endpoint categories from 50 % to 80 % reduction in the single score evaluation. Although midpoint impacts showed mostly reduced environmental impacts, e.g., global warming, land use and others, the water eutrophication – both marine and freshwater, leading to think for improvements in the recycling process.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9641,"journal":{"name":"Case Studies in Construction Materials","volume":"22 ","pages":"Article e04094"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Studies in Construction Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214509524012464","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Building with wood has become more popular and so has the circularity concept and carbon storage in products. This study aims to analyse the life cycle impacts of cross-laminated timber (CLT) recycling. Functional unit of 1 m3 was chosen for the CLT and recycled cross-laminated timber (ReCLT) comparison. For the life cycle assessment, the ReCiPe methodology was used allowing to calculate midpoint and endpoint accumulated impacts of both ReCLT and CLT, therefore allowing for the best comparison. Overall, the ReCLT showed significantly reduced environmental impacts in endpoint categories from 50 % to 80 % reduction in the single score evaluation. Although midpoint impacts showed mostly reduced environmental impacts, e.g., global warming, land use and others, the water eutrophication – both marine and freshwater, leading to think for improvements in the recycling process.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
19.40%
发文量
842
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Case Studies in Construction Materials provides a forum for the rapid publication of short, structured Case Studies on construction materials. In addition, the journal also publishes related Short Communications, Full length research article and Comprehensive review papers (by invitation). The journal will provide an essential compendium of case studies for practicing engineers, designers, researchers and other practitioners who are interested in all aspects construction materials. The journal will publish new and novel case studies, but will also provide a forum for the publication of high quality descriptions of classic construction material problems and solutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信