Propensity matched analysis of DPA or DPL used within the first hour for severely hypotensive blunt trauma patients

IF 1.4 Q3 SURGERY
Mallory Jebbia MD, Jeffry Nahmias MD MHPE, Sebastian Schubl MD, Matthew Dolich MD, Michael Lekawa MD, Allen Kong MD, Areg Grigorian MD
{"title":"Propensity matched analysis of DPA or DPL used within the first hour for severely hypotensive blunt trauma patients","authors":"Mallory Jebbia MD,&nbsp;Jeffry Nahmias MD MHPE,&nbsp;Sebastian Schubl MD,&nbsp;Matthew Dolich MD,&nbsp;Michael Lekawa MD,&nbsp;Allen Kong MD,&nbsp;Areg Grigorian MD","doi":"10.1016/j.sopen.2025.01.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Prior single-center reports advocate for use of diagnostic peritoneal aspiration or lavage (DPA/DPL) to identify blunt trauma patients (BTPs) with intra-abdominal hemorrhage who require emergent surgery. Despite this, concerns exist over the potential for DPA/DPL to delay transfer to the operating room (OR). We hypothesized that DPA/DPL application in severely hypotensive BTPs would lead to increased OR transfer time and in-hospital mortality.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The 2017–2019 TQIP database was queried for adult BTPs presenting with severe hypotension (systolic blood pressure &lt;70 mmHg) who underwent any operative intervention within two-hours. Using a 1:2 propensity-score model, patients who underwent DPA/DPL within one-hour of arrival were compared with those who did not, controlling for age, sex, comorbidities, ≥6 units of packed red cells within 4 h, and injury profile.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>From 5514 patients, 62 (1.1 %) underwent DPA/DPL. We matched 52 DPA/DPL patients to 104 patients not undergoing DPA/DPL. There were no differences in the matched variables between cohorts (all p &gt; 0.05). Compared to those not undergoing DPA/DPL, patients undergoing DPA/DPL had a higher rate/risk of in-hospital complications (59.6 % vs. 39.4 %, p = 0.02) (OR 2.27, CI 1.15–4.47, p = 0.02) but statistically similar rate/risk of death (65.4 % vs. 50.0 %, p = 0.07) (OR 1.89, CI 0.95–3.76, p = 0.07). Time to OR was similar between both groups (DPA/DPL 39 min vs. non-DPA/DPL 42 min, p = 0.87).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>DPA or DPL used within the first hour of arrival does not appear to delay time to OR and does not increase risk of death. This challenges concerns over potential DPA/DPL-associated delays and heightened mortality risks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74892,"journal":{"name":"Surgery open science","volume":"24 ","pages":"Pages 1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery open science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589845025000065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Prior single-center reports advocate for use of diagnostic peritoneal aspiration or lavage (DPA/DPL) to identify blunt trauma patients (BTPs) with intra-abdominal hemorrhage who require emergent surgery. Despite this, concerns exist over the potential for DPA/DPL to delay transfer to the operating room (OR). We hypothesized that DPA/DPL application in severely hypotensive BTPs would lead to increased OR transfer time and in-hospital mortality.

Methods

The 2017–2019 TQIP database was queried for adult BTPs presenting with severe hypotension (systolic blood pressure <70 mmHg) who underwent any operative intervention within two-hours. Using a 1:2 propensity-score model, patients who underwent DPA/DPL within one-hour of arrival were compared with those who did not, controlling for age, sex, comorbidities, ≥6 units of packed red cells within 4 h, and injury profile.

Results

From 5514 patients, 62 (1.1 %) underwent DPA/DPL. We matched 52 DPA/DPL patients to 104 patients not undergoing DPA/DPL. There were no differences in the matched variables between cohorts (all p > 0.05). Compared to those not undergoing DPA/DPL, patients undergoing DPA/DPL had a higher rate/risk of in-hospital complications (59.6 % vs. 39.4 %, p = 0.02) (OR 2.27, CI 1.15–4.47, p = 0.02) but statistically similar rate/risk of death (65.4 % vs. 50.0 %, p = 0.07) (OR 1.89, CI 0.95–3.76, p = 0.07). Time to OR was similar between both groups (DPA/DPL 39 min vs. non-DPA/DPL 42 min, p = 0.87).

Conclusion

DPA or DPL used within the first hour of arrival does not appear to delay time to OR and does not increase risk of death. This challenges concerns over potential DPA/DPL-associated delays and heightened mortality risks.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
66 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信