Stakeholder workshops on western Baltic cod fisheries–conflict and consensus in the face of a highly dynamic ecosystem

IF 4.9 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
W.-C. Lewin , M.E. Pierce , R. Arlinghaus , M.S. Weltersbach , H.V. Strehlow
{"title":"Stakeholder workshops on western Baltic cod fisheries–conflict and consensus in the face of a highly dynamic ecosystem","authors":"W.-C. Lewin ,&nbsp;M.E. Pierce ,&nbsp;R. Arlinghaus ,&nbsp;M.S. Weltersbach ,&nbsp;H.V. Strehlow","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.110983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A shift in ecological systems often produces or exacerbates conflicts among different stakeholders within the corresponding socio-ecological system. One approach to resolution is to involve the various parties in participatory processes (e.g., in a workshop setting) and work towards co-design of management recommendations. Using the western Baltic cod (<em>Gadus morhua</em>) fishery as case study, this research documents a series of stakeholder workshops which happened to take place during the rapid deterioration of the stock. This overlap shed light on challenges for established fisheries management and conservation systems when confronted with rapid, unforeseen changes of the corresponding ecosystems and stakeholder involvement in such situations. The aspiration of the workshops including participatory cognitive mapping was to understand stakeholder perceptions and work towards mutually agreed management recommendations - a goal that became more elusive as the stock collapsed and the fishery was closed during the process. Such situations may become more common in the context of ever-increasing anthropogenic pressures on aquatic ecosystems, including climate change, habitat degradation, and overfishing. The workshops engaged four different stakeholder groups: commercial fishers, recreational fishers, environmental non-governmental organizations, and fisheries authorities. Conflicts were identified with regard to human-wildlife interactions, the role of scientific contributions and competition between commercial and recreational fisheries. Consensus was reached regarding the impact of external factors, particularly eutrophication, and the need for fisheries management and specific management measures. This study documents the workshop results and experiences, reports lessons learnt and translates these into possible steps forward.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55375,"journal":{"name":"Biological Conservation","volume":"302 ","pages":"Article 110983"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320725000205","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A shift in ecological systems often produces or exacerbates conflicts among different stakeholders within the corresponding socio-ecological system. One approach to resolution is to involve the various parties in participatory processes (e.g., in a workshop setting) and work towards co-design of management recommendations. Using the western Baltic cod (Gadus morhua) fishery as case study, this research documents a series of stakeholder workshops which happened to take place during the rapid deterioration of the stock. This overlap shed light on challenges for established fisheries management and conservation systems when confronted with rapid, unforeseen changes of the corresponding ecosystems and stakeholder involvement in such situations. The aspiration of the workshops including participatory cognitive mapping was to understand stakeholder perceptions and work towards mutually agreed management recommendations - a goal that became more elusive as the stock collapsed and the fishery was closed during the process. Such situations may become more common in the context of ever-increasing anthropogenic pressures on aquatic ecosystems, including climate change, habitat degradation, and overfishing. The workshops engaged four different stakeholder groups: commercial fishers, recreational fishers, environmental non-governmental organizations, and fisheries authorities. Conflicts were identified with regard to human-wildlife interactions, the role of scientific contributions and competition between commercial and recreational fisheries. Consensus was reached regarding the impact of external factors, particularly eutrophication, and the need for fisheries management and specific management measures. This study documents the workshop results and experiences, reports lessons learnt and translates these into possible steps forward.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biological Conservation
Biological Conservation 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
295
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Biological Conservation is an international leading journal in the discipline of conservation biology. The journal publishes articles spanning a diverse range of fields that contribute to the biological, sociological, and economic dimensions of conservation and natural resource management. The primary aim of Biological Conservation is the publication of high-quality papers that advance the science and practice of conservation, or which demonstrate the application of conservation principles for natural resource management and policy. Therefore it will be of interest to a broad international readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信