A novel self-adaptive step size first-order method for structural reliability analysis based on modified Sigmoid function and Armijo rule

IF 3 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
Yu Xia, Yiying Hu, Yingye Yu
{"title":"A novel self-adaptive step size first-order method for structural reliability analysis based on modified Sigmoid function and Armijo rule","authors":"Yu Xia,&nbsp;Yiying Hu,&nbsp;Yingye Yu","doi":"10.1016/j.probengmech.2024.103721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Among the first-order reliability methods (FORM), the Hasofer-Lind and Rackwitz-Fiessler method (HL-RF), and the chaos control method (CC) rely on a fixed step size and cannot generate an adaptive one, making it difficult to achieve a satisfactory trade-off between efficiency and robustness when dealing with highly nonlinear problems. To address these drawbacks, this paper proposes two innovative first-order reliability methods: the Sigmoid-based self-adaptive step size adjustment method (SSA) and the hybrid Sigmoid-based self-adaptive step size adjustment method (HSSA). The iterative rotation angle is first determined for both proposed methods. In the SSA method, a modified Sigmoid function is employed to enable nonlinear adaptive adjustments of the step size based on changes in the iterative turning angles, allowing for rapid convergence. Subsequently, the HSSA method incorporates the Armijo rule to further explore a more effective solution. Both proposed methods demonstrate strong computational merits, favorable performance, and user-friendly procedures, providing self-adaptive step sizes suitable for engineering problems, thus offering a broad range of applications. The paper introduces eight examples to showcase the remarkable performance of the two proposed methods. The results indicate that both methods exhibit significantly superior efficiency and robustness compared to other comparative analytical FORM methods when addressing highly nonlinear engineering challenges. Finally, a discussion is presented.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54583,"journal":{"name":"Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics","volume":"79 ","pages":"Article 103721"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266892024001437","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Among the first-order reliability methods (FORM), the Hasofer-Lind and Rackwitz-Fiessler method (HL-RF), and the chaos control method (CC) rely on a fixed step size and cannot generate an adaptive one, making it difficult to achieve a satisfactory trade-off between efficiency and robustness when dealing with highly nonlinear problems. To address these drawbacks, this paper proposes two innovative first-order reliability methods: the Sigmoid-based self-adaptive step size adjustment method (SSA) and the hybrid Sigmoid-based self-adaptive step size adjustment method (HSSA). The iterative rotation angle is first determined for both proposed methods. In the SSA method, a modified Sigmoid function is employed to enable nonlinear adaptive adjustments of the step size based on changes in the iterative turning angles, allowing for rapid convergence. Subsequently, the HSSA method incorporates the Armijo rule to further explore a more effective solution. Both proposed methods demonstrate strong computational merits, favorable performance, and user-friendly procedures, providing self-adaptive step sizes suitable for engineering problems, thus offering a broad range of applications. The paper introduces eight examples to showcase the remarkable performance of the two proposed methods. The results indicate that both methods exhibit significantly superior efficiency and robustness compared to other comparative analytical FORM methods when addressing highly nonlinear engineering challenges. Finally, a discussion is presented.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics
Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics 工程技术-工程:机械
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
15.40%
发文量
98
审稿时长
13.5 months
期刊介绍: This journal provides a forum for scholarly work dealing primarily with probabilistic and statistical approaches to contemporary solid/structural and fluid mechanics problems encountered in diverse technical disciplines such as aerospace, civil, marine, mechanical, and nuclear engineering. The journal aims to maintain a healthy balance between general solution techniques and problem-specific results, encouraging a fruitful exchange of ideas among disparate engineering specialities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信