Opinions on neural implants for children with cerebral palsy: A survey of the Australian cerebral palsy community

IF 4.9 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Samarth Shrivastava , Yvette Pollock , Ismail Sadozai , Petra Karlsson , Darryl Chiu , Simanto Saha , Luke Gordon , Tawanwart Thipayawat , Alistair McEwan
{"title":"Opinions on neural implants for children with cerebral palsy: A survey of the Australian cerebral palsy community","authors":"Samarth Shrivastava ,&nbsp;Yvette Pollock ,&nbsp;Ismail Sadozai ,&nbsp;Petra Karlsson ,&nbsp;Darryl Chiu ,&nbsp;Simanto Saha ,&nbsp;Luke Gordon ,&nbsp;Tawanwart Thipayawat ,&nbsp;Alistair McEwan","doi":"10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100591","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The aim of this study was to understand the opinions of the Australian cerebral palsy (CP) community on neural implants for children with CP. An online survey was distributed by the CP Registers of two populous Australian states, seeking opinions on cochlear implants, spinal cord stimulators, and electrocorticography brain-computer interfaces. Participants rated how acceptable they found the use of each implant across age groups, while also detailing their concerns with each. Data were analysed using non-parametric statistics and conventional content analysis. Nine adults with CP and 43 parents/carers of people with CP completed the survey. Most participants found the use of each implant acceptable throughout childhood. However, especially for younger children, acceptability was higher for cochlear implants than for the two emerging devices. Common participant concerns were that the child may identify positively with their condition and the community, that the implant may not be effective for the various types and severities of CP, and that parents may not have enough information to decide that the benefits outweigh the risks. These findings provide initial validation to researchers that families of potential young users will consider such neural implants, while also reinforcing the need for transparent communication with the CP community.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72681,"journal":{"name":"Computers in human behavior reports","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100591"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in human behavior reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451958825000065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to understand the opinions of the Australian cerebral palsy (CP) community on neural implants for children with CP. An online survey was distributed by the CP Registers of two populous Australian states, seeking opinions on cochlear implants, spinal cord stimulators, and electrocorticography brain-computer interfaces. Participants rated how acceptable they found the use of each implant across age groups, while also detailing their concerns with each. Data were analysed using non-parametric statistics and conventional content analysis. Nine adults with CP and 43 parents/carers of people with CP completed the survey. Most participants found the use of each implant acceptable throughout childhood. However, especially for younger children, acceptability was higher for cochlear implants than for the two emerging devices. Common participant concerns were that the child may identify positively with their condition and the community, that the implant may not be effective for the various types and severities of CP, and that parents may not have enough information to decide that the benefits outweigh the risks. These findings provide initial validation to researchers that families of potential young users will consider such neural implants, while also reinforcing the need for transparent communication with the CP community.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信