The liking gap online: People like us more than we think

IF 4.9 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Vanessa Y. Oviedo , Andrew J. Guydish , Jean E. Fox Tree
{"title":"The liking gap online: People like us more than we think","authors":"Vanessa Y. Oviedo ,&nbsp;Andrew J. Guydish ,&nbsp;Jean E. Fox Tree","doi":"10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Generating perceptions of others is usually effortless, but determining how others perceive us is more demanding. People often underestimate how much others like them, a cognitive bias known as the liking gap. We examined how the communicative setting affected the liking gap in conversation. We conducted two experiments where participants interacted via text, audio, or video-chat, then switched to video-chat. In Experiment 1, participants worked on tangram tasks. After this, they completed a memory test of the tangrams seen. The liking gap was present across all settings with no significant differences between them. Recall of tangrams was best when switching from text-chat to video-chat. In Experiment 2, participants engaged in conversations about favorite movies and TV shows. After this, they recalled topics they discussed. Again, the liking gap persisted across settings with no significant differences. Recall of topics was best when switching from text-chat to video-chat and from audio-chat to video-chat.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72681,"journal":{"name":"Computers in human behavior reports","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100582"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in human behavior reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S245195882400215X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Generating perceptions of others is usually effortless, but determining how others perceive us is more demanding. People often underestimate how much others like them, a cognitive bias known as the liking gap. We examined how the communicative setting affected the liking gap in conversation. We conducted two experiments where participants interacted via text, audio, or video-chat, then switched to video-chat. In Experiment 1, participants worked on tangram tasks. After this, they completed a memory test of the tangrams seen. The liking gap was present across all settings with no significant differences between them. Recall of tangrams was best when switching from text-chat to video-chat. In Experiment 2, participants engaged in conversations about favorite movies and TV shows. After this, they recalled topics they discussed. Again, the liking gap persisted across settings with no significant differences. Recall of topics was best when switching from text-chat to video-chat and from audio-chat to video-chat.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信