The relative importance of looks, height, job, bio, intelligence, and homophily in online dating: A conjoint analysis

IF 4.9 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Jessika Witmer , Hannes Rosenbusch , Erdem O. Meral
{"title":"The relative importance of looks, height, job, bio, intelligence, and homophily in online dating: A conjoint analysis","authors":"Jessika Witmer ,&nbsp;Hannes Rosenbusch ,&nbsp;Erdem O. Meral","doi":"10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Researchers have forwarded many attributes that boost (or impede) dating success, but rarely quantify their relative importance in real dating scenarios. Here, we observed matching decisions of hetero- and bisexual online daters to isolate the simultaneous effects of targets' physical attractiveness, height, job, intelligence, biography, as well as selector X target homophily. A conjoint analysis of 5340 “swiping” decisions by 445 online daters demonstrated an overwhelming importance of physical attractiveness for dating success. A one SD improvement in physical attractiveness boosts one's selection success by around 20%, while the same increase in intelligence only improves one's chances by 2%. While this field study replicates and concretizes many laboratory findings, our conjoint attribute evaluation also showed that men and women had equal priorities and attribute effects, opposing some common hypotheses in the field. Further, the causal effects of intelligence, height, bio, occupation, and self-reported homophily were literature-consistent, but 7 to 20 times smaller than the effect of attractiveness. Implications for studying dating decisions, as well as practical considerations for designing dating profiles and apps, are discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72681,"journal":{"name":"Computers in human behavior reports","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100579"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in human behavior reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451958824002124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Researchers have forwarded many attributes that boost (or impede) dating success, but rarely quantify their relative importance in real dating scenarios. Here, we observed matching decisions of hetero- and bisexual online daters to isolate the simultaneous effects of targets' physical attractiveness, height, job, intelligence, biography, as well as selector X target homophily. A conjoint analysis of 5340 “swiping” decisions by 445 online daters demonstrated an overwhelming importance of physical attractiveness for dating success. A one SD improvement in physical attractiveness boosts one's selection success by around 20%, while the same increase in intelligence only improves one's chances by 2%. While this field study replicates and concretizes many laboratory findings, our conjoint attribute evaluation also showed that men and women had equal priorities and attribute effects, opposing some common hypotheses in the field. Further, the causal effects of intelligence, height, bio, occupation, and self-reported homophily were literature-consistent, but 7 to 20 times smaller than the effect of attractiveness. Implications for studying dating decisions, as well as practical considerations for designing dating profiles and apps, are discussed.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信