Potential remineralizing effect of cuttlefish bone and eggshell Powder's on demineralized human enamel (an invitro study)

IF 0.6 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Nehad M. Abd-elmonsif , Sherif Gamal
{"title":"Potential remineralizing effect of cuttlefish bone and eggshell Powder's on demineralized human enamel (an invitro study)","authors":"Nehad M. Abd-elmonsif ,&nbsp;Sherif Gamal","doi":"10.1016/j.pdj.2024.08.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Dental treatment has been shifted towards more conservative approaches that focus on caries identification at early stage, remineralization of dental surfaces, and preservation of tooth structure. So that, newly safe alternative methods for teeth remineralization have to be created. There is minimal evidence to support the use of eggshell powder (ESP) for remineralizing enamel and Cuttlefish bone powder (CBP) as an alternative calcium source in bone replacement.The aim of this study is to evaluate the capacity of eggshell powder (ESP) and cuttlefish bone powder (CBP) solutions to remineralize early initiated demineralized lesions of enamel in permanent teeth. 40 extracted premolars were divided into four groups: Group1 (which received no treatment), Group2 (which was subjected todemineralizing solution), Group3 (which was subjected todemineralizing solution and then treated with CBP solution), and Group4 (which was subjected todemineralizing solution and then treated with ESPsolution). All groups were prepared forscanning electron microscope (SEM), X-ray microanalysis (EDAX), and microhardness evaluation. The demineralization process significantly changed the surface structure of the enamel, resulting in erosive lesions. CBP and ESP solutions both had a reparative effect, enhanced surface morphology, and increased Ca and P content and microhardness.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19977,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Dental Journal","volume":"34 3","pages":"Pages 122-128"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0917239424000272","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dental treatment has been shifted towards more conservative approaches that focus on caries identification at early stage, remineralization of dental surfaces, and preservation of tooth structure. So that, newly safe alternative methods for teeth remineralization have to be created. There is minimal evidence to support the use of eggshell powder (ESP) for remineralizing enamel and Cuttlefish bone powder (CBP) as an alternative calcium source in bone replacement.The aim of this study is to evaluate the capacity of eggshell powder (ESP) and cuttlefish bone powder (CBP) solutions to remineralize early initiated demineralized lesions of enamel in permanent teeth. 40 extracted premolars were divided into four groups: Group1 (which received no treatment), Group2 (which was subjected todemineralizing solution), Group3 (which was subjected todemineralizing solution and then treated with CBP solution), and Group4 (which was subjected todemineralizing solution and then treated with ESPsolution). All groups were prepared forscanning electron microscope (SEM), X-ray microanalysis (EDAX), and microhardness evaluation. The demineralization process significantly changed the surface structure of the enamel, resulting in erosive lesions. CBP and ESP solutions both had a reparative effect, enhanced surface morphology, and increased Ca and P content and microhardness.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric Dental Journal
Pediatric Dental Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
26 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信