Oligometastatic squamous cell carcinoma treated with and without involved site radiation

Allen M. Chen
{"title":"Oligometastatic squamous cell carcinoma treated with and without involved site radiation","authors":"Allen M. Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.oor.2024.100707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Comprising a heterogenous population, the optimal management of oligometastatic head and neck cancer is uncertain. We sought to report outcomes among patients treated with and without stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) to local sites of disease.</div></div><div><h3>Methods and materials</h3><div>A review of institutional registries identified 49 patients with metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck limited to 5 sites of disease or less. Patients with intact disease at primary local-regional sites; those treated by palliative radiation; and those who had previously received first-line systemic therapy were excluded.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 20 patients met eligibility criteria. Treatment included systemic therapy alone (10 patients) and systemic therapy with SBRT (10 patients). The median progression-free survival was 11 months and 6 months, respectively (p = 0.09). The 2-year overall survival was 29 % and 15 % for patients treated by SBRT and systemic therapy compared to systemic therapy alone, respectively (p = 0.21). There were no differences in the development of grade 3+ toxicity between the 2 groups, with the incidence of grade 3+ toxicity being 20 % and 30 % for patients treated with and without SBRT, respectively (p = 0.61).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Local SBRT was associated with trends in improved progression-free survival among patients with oligometastatic head and neck cancer. Prospective studies with larger datasets are warranted to further evaluate the role of this modality in this setting.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94378,"journal":{"name":"Oral Oncology Reports","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100707"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral Oncology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772906024005533","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Comprising a heterogenous population, the optimal management of oligometastatic head and neck cancer is uncertain. We sought to report outcomes among patients treated with and without stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) to local sites of disease.

Methods and materials

A review of institutional registries identified 49 patients with metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck limited to 5 sites of disease or less. Patients with intact disease at primary local-regional sites; those treated by palliative radiation; and those who had previously received first-line systemic therapy were excluded.

Results

A total of 20 patients met eligibility criteria. Treatment included systemic therapy alone (10 patients) and systemic therapy with SBRT (10 patients). The median progression-free survival was 11 months and 6 months, respectively (p = 0.09). The 2-year overall survival was 29 % and 15 % for patients treated by SBRT and systemic therapy compared to systemic therapy alone, respectively (p = 0.21). There were no differences in the development of grade 3+ toxicity between the 2 groups, with the incidence of grade 3+ toxicity being 20 % and 30 % for patients treated with and without SBRT, respectively (p = 0.61).

Conclusion

Local SBRT was associated with trends in improved progression-free survival among patients with oligometastatic head and neck cancer. Prospective studies with larger datasets are warranted to further evaluate the role of this modality in this setting.
少转移性鳞状细胞癌有或没有受累部位放射治疗
目的:由于头颈部低转移性癌的患者群体具有异质性,其最佳治疗方法尚不确定。我们试图报告接受和未接受立体定向体放疗(SBRT)治疗的局部病变患者的结果。方法和材料:对机构登记资料的回顾确定了49例头颈部转移性鳞状细胞癌患者,限于5个或更少的疾病部位。原发局部-区域病灶完整的患者;接受姑息性放射治疗的患者;那些之前接受过一线全身治疗的患者被排除在外。结果20例患者符合入选标准。治疗包括单独全身治疗(10例)和全身治疗联合SBRT(10例)。中位无进展生存期分别为11个月和6个月(p = 0.09)。与单独接受全身治疗相比,接受SBRT和全身治疗的患者的2年总生存率分别为29%和15% (p = 0.21)。两组间3+级毒性的发生无差异,接受和不接受SBRT治疗的患者3+级毒性的发生率分别为20%和30% (p = 0.61)。结论:局部SBRT与低转移性头颈癌患者无进展生存期的改善趋势相关。有必要进行更大数据集的前瞻性研究,以进一步评估这种模式在这种情况下的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信