A study on sorting strategies in marshaling yards with a limited number of tracks and track capacity

IF 2.6 Q3 TRANSPORTATION
Max Zien , Thomas Kirschstein , Christian Bierwirth
{"title":"A study on sorting strategies in marshaling yards with a limited number of tracks and track capacity","authors":"Max Zien ,&nbsp;Thomas Kirschstein ,&nbsp;Christian Bierwirth","doi":"10.1016/j.jrtpm.2024.100498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In marshaling yards, freight wagons are sorted from inbound trains to outbound trains for further transport. To organize an efficient shunting process, sorting strategies are proposed in the literature. The application of sorting strategies is generally restricted by the number of classification tracks and their lengths. This can lead to difficult-to-implement or even inoperative sorting plans. To handle limited track capacity, we decompose the shunting process into a series of consecutive periods of time resembling timetables of inbound trains. A heuristic is used in every period to decide on the postponement of inbound trains when track capacity is scarce. This way, sorting strategies become applicable on a rolling time basis. A strategy is said to solve a shunting task when it enables building all outbound trains within a given time horizon. We examine the performance of five well-known sorting strategies for a large set of shunting tasks within a computational study. The simulation results indicate that the sorting strategies perform differently when numbers and lengths of classification tracks vary. In conclusion, we are able to determine the most reliable strategy among the set of considered sorting strategies for a marshaling yard of a certain size.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51821,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rail Transport Planning & Management","volume":"33 ","pages":"Article 100498"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rail Transport Planning & Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210970624000684","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In marshaling yards, freight wagons are sorted from inbound trains to outbound trains for further transport. To organize an efficient shunting process, sorting strategies are proposed in the literature. The application of sorting strategies is generally restricted by the number of classification tracks and their lengths. This can lead to difficult-to-implement or even inoperative sorting plans. To handle limited track capacity, we decompose the shunting process into a series of consecutive periods of time resembling timetables of inbound trains. A heuristic is used in every period to decide on the postponement of inbound trains when track capacity is scarce. This way, sorting strategies become applicable on a rolling time basis. A strategy is said to solve a shunting task when it enables building all outbound trains within a given time horizon. We examine the performance of five well-known sorting strategies for a large set of shunting tasks within a computational study. The simulation results indicate that the sorting strategies perform differently when numbers and lengths of classification tracks vary. In conclusion, we are able to determine the most reliable strategy among the set of considered sorting strategies for a marshaling yard of a certain size.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
8.10%
发文量
41
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信