Enhancing concrete strength and durability through incorporation of rice husk ash and high recycled aggregate

IF 6.5 2区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Mohammad Alharthai , Kennedy C. Onyelowe , Tariq Ali , Muhammad Zeeshan Qureshi , Aïssa Rezzoug , Ahmed Deifalla , Khalid Alharthi
{"title":"Enhancing concrete strength and durability through incorporation of rice husk ash and high recycled aggregate","authors":"Mohammad Alharthai ,&nbsp;Kennedy C. Onyelowe ,&nbsp;Tariq Ali ,&nbsp;Muhammad Zeeshan Qureshi ,&nbsp;Aïssa Rezzoug ,&nbsp;Ahmed Deifalla ,&nbsp;Khalid Alharthi","doi":"10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e04152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The global environment faces significant challenges due to the massive use of concrete, a dominant material in construction. Addressing this challenge, the present study explores the potential of recycled concrete aggregate (RCA) combined with rice husk ash (RHA) to enhance the durability and strength of recycled aggregate concrete (RAC), particularly in mixes with high RCA content. The research examines RHA as a partial substitute for Ordinary Portland Cement at 5 %,10 %,15 % and 20 % replacement levels, alongside RCA substitution rates of 80 %, 90 %, and 100 %. Five RAC mixes were evaluated: Mix-1 served as the control group with varying RCA percentages (80 %, 90 %, and 100 %) without RHA, whereas Mix-2, Mix-3, Mix-4 and Mix-5 incorporated 5 %,10 %,15 % and 20 %RHA as a cement substitute. The study evaluated parameters such as workability, compressive strength, tensile strength, water absorption, and acid resistance, in addition to employing non-destructive testing techniques like ultrasonic pulse velocity and rebound hammer tests. After 28 days of curing, Mix-4 (comprising 15 % RHA and 80 % RCA) exhibited the highest compressive strength among the tested RAC mixes, achieving a value of approximately 27 MPa. However, economic analysis revealed that Mix-5 (20 % RHA and 100 % RCA) offers a 31 % reduction in production costs, making it a viable choice for concrete manufacturing. This integration of RCA and RHA presents a sustainable, eco-friendly, and cost-effective approach to enhancing concrete strength and durability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9641,"journal":{"name":"Case Studies in Construction Materials","volume":"22 ","pages":"Article e04152"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Studies in Construction Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214509524013044","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The global environment faces significant challenges due to the massive use of concrete, a dominant material in construction. Addressing this challenge, the present study explores the potential of recycled concrete aggregate (RCA) combined with rice husk ash (RHA) to enhance the durability and strength of recycled aggregate concrete (RAC), particularly in mixes with high RCA content. The research examines RHA as a partial substitute for Ordinary Portland Cement at 5 %,10 %,15 % and 20 % replacement levels, alongside RCA substitution rates of 80 %, 90 %, and 100 %. Five RAC mixes were evaluated: Mix-1 served as the control group with varying RCA percentages (80 %, 90 %, and 100 %) without RHA, whereas Mix-2, Mix-3, Mix-4 and Mix-5 incorporated 5 %,10 %,15 % and 20 %RHA as a cement substitute. The study evaluated parameters such as workability, compressive strength, tensile strength, water absorption, and acid resistance, in addition to employing non-destructive testing techniques like ultrasonic pulse velocity and rebound hammer tests. After 28 days of curing, Mix-4 (comprising 15 % RHA and 80 % RCA) exhibited the highest compressive strength among the tested RAC mixes, achieving a value of approximately 27 MPa. However, economic analysis revealed that Mix-5 (20 % RHA and 100 % RCA) offers a 31 % reduction in production costs, making it a viable choice for concrete manufacturing. This integration of RCA and RHA presents a sustainable, eco-friendly, and cost-effective approach to enhancing concrete strength and durability.
通过稻壳灰和高再生骨料的掺入,提高混凝土的强度和耐久性
由于混凝土的大量使用,全球环境面临着重大挑战,混凝土是建筑中的主要材料。为了应对这一挑战,本研究探索了再生混凝土骨料(RCA)与稻壳灰(RHA)结合的潜力,以提高再生骨料混凝土(RAC)的耐久性和强度,特别是在高RCA含量的混合物中。该研究考察了RHA作为普通硅酸盐水泥的部分替代品,其替代水平分别为5 %、10 %、15 %和20 %,RCA的替代率分别为80 %、90 %和100 %。对5种RAC混合料进行了评估:Mix-1作为不含RHA的不同RCA百分比(80 %、90 %和100 %)的对照组,而Mix-2、Mix-3、Mix-4和Mix-5分别添加了5 %、10 %、15 %和20 %的RHA作为水泥替代品。该研究评估了可加工性、抗压强度、抗拉强度、吸水率和耐酸性等参数,此外还采用了超声波脉冲速度和回弹锤测试等无损检测技术。养护28天后,Mix-4(含15% % RHA和80% % RCA)在测试的RAC混合料中表现出最高的抗压强度,达到约27 MPa。然而,经济分析表明,Mix-5(20% % RHA和100% % RCA)可降低生产成本31% %,使其成为混凝土制造的可行选择。这种RCA和RHA的结合提出了一种可持续的、环保的、具有成本效益的方法来提高混凝土的强度和耐久性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
19.40%
发文量
842
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Case Studies in Construction Materials provides a forum for the rapid publication of short, structured Case Studies on construction materials. In addition, the journal also publishes related Short Communications, Full length research article and Comprehensive review papers (by invitation). The journal will provide an essential compendium of case studies for practicing engineers, designers, researchers and other practitioners who are interested in all aspects construction materials. The journal will publish new and novel case studies, but will also provide a forum for the publication of high quality descriptions of classic construction material problems and solutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信