Innovative strategies in bile duct repair: Assessing efficacy and safety across varied graft techniques - A systematic review

IF 1.4 Q3 SURGERY
Anung Noto Nugroho , Soetrisno Soetrisno , Ambar Mudigdo , Kristanto Yuli Yarso , Dono Indarto , Akmal Zhahir Wahyudi , Enrico Ananda Budiono , Auliya Yudia Yasyfin
{"title":"Innovative strategies in bile duct repair: Assessing efficacy and safety across varied graft techniques - A systematic review","authors":"Anung Noto Nugroho ,&nbsp;Soetrisno Soetrisno ,&nbsp;Ambar Mudigdo ,&nbsp;Kristanto Yuli Yarso ,&nbsp;Dono Indarto ,&nbsp;Akmal Zhahir Wahyudi ,&nbsp;Enrico Ananda Budiono ,&nbsp;Auliya Yudia Yasyfin","doi":"10.1016/j.sopen.2025.01.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Bile duct injuries (BDI) from surgical procedures pose significant clinical challenges, requiring precise interventions for optimal outcomes. This systematic review explores the utilization of grafts in the repair of bile duct injuries, aiming to gain insights from existing literature. Graft-based techniques show promise in improving postoperative outcomes, but their efficacy varies. A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Science Direct, and Scopus following the PRISMA 2020 Checklist, focusing on studies published until February 19, 2024. The inclusion criteria involved research using grafts to treat bile duct injuries in pig, swine, or mini-pig models. Out of 2231 studies identified, eleven met the inclusion criteria. These studies evaluated various graft techniques, including autologous tissue with biodegradable stents, decellularized grafts, patches, prosthetic grafts, bacterial cellulose film, and heterogeneous materials. Each method had distinct advantages and limitations, particularly regarding postoperative outcomes and histological findings. This review highlights the need for further research to determine the most effective graft-based strategies for BDI repair and improve patient care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74892,"journal":{"name":"Surgery open science","volume":"24 ","pages":"Pages 5-15"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery open science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589845025000053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bile duct injuries (BDI) from surgical procedures pose significant clinical challenges, requiring precise interventions for optimal outcomes. This systematic review explores the utilization of grafts in the repair of bile duct injuries, aiming to gain insights from existing literature. Graft-based techniques show promise in improving postoperative outcomes, but their efficacy varies. A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Science Direct, and Scopus following the PRISMA 2020 Checklist, focusing on studies published until February 19, 2024. The inclusion criteria involved research using grafts to treat bile duct injuries in pig, swine, or mini-pig models. Out of 2231 studies identified, eleven met the inclusion criteria. These studies evaluated various graft techniques, including autologous tissue with biodegradable stents, decellularized grafts, patches, prosthetic grafts, bacterial cellulose film, and heterogeneous materials. Each method had distinct advantages and limitations, particularly regarding postoperative outcomes and histological findings. This review highlights the need for further research to determine the most effective graft-based strategies for BDI repair and improve patient care.
胆管修复的创新策略:评估不同移植技术的有效性和安全性-系统回顾
胆管损伤(BDI)的外科手术带来了重大的临床挑战,需要精确的干预以获得最佳结果。本系统综述探讨了移植在胆管损伤修复中的应用,旨在从现有文献中获得见解。基于移植物的技术有望改善术后预后,但其疗效各不相同。根据PRISMA 2020检查表,对PubMed、Science Direct和Scopus进行了系统检索,重点关注于2024年2月19日之前发表的研究。纳入标准包括猪、猪或迷你猪模型中使用移植物治疗胆管损伤的研究。在确定的2231项研究中,有11项符合纳入标准。这些研究评估了各种移植技术,包括带有可生物降解支架的自体组织、脱细胞移植物、贴片、假体移植物、细菌纤维素膜和异质材料。每种方法都有其独特的优点和局限性,特别是在术后结果和组织学发现方面。这篇综述强调需要进一步的研究来确定最有效的基于移植物的BDI修复策略和改善患者护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
66 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信