Osteophyte of the first costochondral joint is a reliable landmark to facilitate standardized robotic left internal mammary artery harvesting

IF 1.7 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Peiling He MM, Yan Yang MM, Yi Song MM, Ye Yuan MM, Wenjun Wu MM, Chang Liu MM, Yijie Hu MD
{"title":"Osteophyte of the first costochondral joint is a reliable landmark to facilitate standardized robotic left internal mammary artery harvesting","authors":"Peiling He MM,&nbsp;Yan Yang MM,&nbsp;Yi Song MM,&nbsp;Ye Yuan MM,&nbsp;Wenjun Wu MM,&nbsp;Chang Liu MM,&nbsp;Yijie Hu MD","doi":"10.1016/j.xjtc.2024.11.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Robotic left internal mammary artery (LIMA) harvesting can present various challenges for novice surgeons. This study aimed to investigate whether the osteophyte of the first costochondral joint (OFCCJ) could serve as an anatomical landmark for robotic LIMA harvesting and to explore the optimal standardized process.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The concept of “LIMA isthmus” was described on the basis of relatively fixed anatomical relationship between LIMA and OFCCJ, and the height of OFCCJ and its distance to LIMA were defined. The presence and features of OFCCJ were analyzed in 514 hospitalized patients with or without coronary artery diseases (CAD or non-CAD). The value of “LIMA isthmus”-based robotic harvesting strategy was further assessed for beginners during the learning curve phase.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The OFCCJs were found to be very common in the adult population. The prevalence of OFCCJ in patients with CAD was significantly greater than in patients without CAD (73.16% vs 60.33%, <em>P</em> &lt; .01). However, there were no significant difference between the CAD and the non-CAD group in the height of the OFCCJ or the distance between the OFCCJ and the LIMA (15.54 ± 4.99 mm vs 16.55 ± 4.70 mm, <em>P</em> = .06; 12.66 ± 4.19 mm vs 12.45 ± 6.87 mm, <em>P</em> = .72). During the learning curve phase, the time to identify LIMA and the time for LIMA harvesting using “LIMA isthmus”-based strategy were significantly shorter than those with conventional approach (89.00 ± 31.07 seconds vs 1087 ± 436.1 seconds, <em>P</em> = .035; 86.80 ± 4.74 minutes vs 110.5 ± 11.72 minutes, <em>P</em> = .013). The inadvertent bleeding events with “LIMA isthmus”-based graft harvesting were much fewer (1.00 ± 0.19 vs 3.44 ± 0.34, <em>P</em> &lt; .001), although there was no difference between 2 beginners in postoperative chest drainage, LIMA injury events, or conversion to a median sternotomy incision.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>OFCCJ could serve as a reliable anatomical landmark to guide robotic LIMA harvesting. “LIMA isthmus”-based standardized robotic LIMA harvesting could significantly reduce the time to determine LIMA and the time for graft harvesting process, and minimize the risk of inadvertent bleeding events. This could be particularly beneficial for novice surgeons during the initial learning curve phase of this procedure.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":53413,"journal":{"name":"JTCVS Techniques","volume":"29 ","pages":"Pages 56-64"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JTCVS Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666250724004966","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Robotic left internal mammary artery (LIMA) harvesting can present various challenges for novice surgeons. This study aimed to investigate whether the osteophyte of the first costochondral joint (OFCCJ) could serve as an anatomical landmark for robotic LIMA harvesting and to explore the optimal standardized process.

Methods

The concept of “LIMA isthmus” was described on the basis of relatively fixed anatomical relationship between LIMA and OFCCJ, and the height of OFCCJ and its distance to LIMA were defined. The presence and features of OFCCJ were analyzed in 514 hospitalized patients with or without coronary artery diseases (CAD or non-CAD). The value of “LIMA isthmus”-based robotic harvesting strategy was further assessed for beginners during the learning curve phase.

Results

The OFCCJs were found to be very common in the adult population. The prevalence of OFCCJ in patients with CAD was significantly greater than in patients without CAD (73.16% vs 60.33%, P < .01). However, there were no significant difference between the CAD and the non-CAD group in the height of the OFCCJ or the distance between the OFCCJ and the LIMA (15.54 ± 4.99 mm vs 16.55 ± 4.70 mm, P = .06; 12.66 ± 4.19 mm vs 12.45 ± 6.87 mm, P = .72). During the learning curve phase, the time to identify LIMA and the time for LIMA harvesting using “LIMA isthmus”-based strategy were significantly shorter than those with conventional approach (89.00 ± 31.07 seconds vs 1087 ± 436.1 seconds, P = .035; 86.80 ± 4.74 minutes vs 110.5 ± 11.72 minutes, P = .013). The inadvertent bleeding events with “LIMA isthmus”-based graft harvesting were much fewer (1.00 ± 0.19 vs 3.44 ± 0.34, P < .001), although there was no difference between 2 beginners in postoperative chest drainage, LIMA injury events, or conversion to a median sternotomy incision.

Conclusions

OFCCJ could serve as a reliable anatomical landmark to guide robotic LIMA harvesting. “LIMA isthmus”-based standardized robotic LIMA harvesting could significantly reduce the time to determine LIMA and the time for graft harvesting process, and minimize the risk of inadvertent bleeding events. This could be particularly beneficial for novice surgeons during the initial learning curve phase of this procedure.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JTCVS Techniques
JTCVS Techniques Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
6.20%
发文量
311
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信