The battle for kerbside space: An evaluation of the competition between car-hailing and bus services

IF 6.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS
Tianli Tang , Ronghui Liu , Greg Marsden , Ziyuan Gu , Xiao Fu
{"title":"The battle for kerbside space: An evaluation of the competition between car-hailing and bus services","authors":"Tianli Tang ,&nbsp;Ronghui Liu ,&nbsp;Greg Marsden ,&nbsp;Ziyuan Gu ,&nbsp;Xiao Fu","doi":"10.1016/j.tra.2025.104392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The kerbside of today is a complex environment with a huge diversity of uses and highly dynamic patterns of use, including for parking, (un)loading, EV charging, and bus stops. The competition for kerbside space is to become more fierce with the rising of car-hailing services (CHS) and soon the connected and autonomous vehicles (CAVs). The kerbside is an often overlooked yet critical urban infrastructure which requires better understanding of its varies uses and functions. In this paper, we examine the competition between CHSs and traditional buses on the use of kerbside lanes. More specifically, we investigate the relationship between the mode share of car-hailing and bus services, network congestion and the performance of bus priority strategies along a real-life bus corridor and quantify their effects through simulation modelling of a set of future scenarios. The results show that the increasing penetration of car-hailing services will negatively impact network performance due to the growing number of kerbside stops, while increasing the share of public transport can help mitigate this loss and improve network resilience. Additionally, bus improvement policies, such as bus lanes and faster boarding techniques, can effectively prevent the adverse effects of car-hailing on network speed. These findings demonstrate the importance of managing kerbside space in a range of scenarios and offer valuable insights to authorities and researchers for policy-making and modelling.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49421,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","volume":"192 ","pages":"Article 104392"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856425000205","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The kerbside of today is a complex environment with a huge diversity of uses and highly dynamic patterns of use, including for parking, (un)loading, EV charging, and bus stops. The competition for kerbside space is to become more fierce with the rising of car-hailing services (CHS) and soon the connected and autonomous vehicles (CAVs). The kerbside is an often overlooked yet critical urban infrastructure which requires better understanding of its varies uses and functions. In this paper, we examine the competition between CHSs and traditional buses on the use of kerbside lanes. More specifically, we investigate the relationship between the mode share of car-hailing and bus services, network congestion and the performance of bus priority strategies along a real-life bus corridor and quantify their effects through simulation modelling of a set of future scenarios. The results show that the increasing penetration of car-hailing services will negatively impact network performance due to the growing number of kerbside stops, while increasing the share of public transport can help mitigate this loss and improve network resilience. Additionally, bus improvement policies, such as bus lanes and faster boarding techniques, can effectively prevent the adverse effects of car-hailing on network speed. These findings demonstrate the importance of managing kerbside space in a range of scenarios and offer valuable insights to authorities and researchers for policy-making and modelling.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
7.80%
发文量
257
审稿时长
9.8 months
期刊介绍: Transportation Research: Part A contains papers of general interest in all passenger and freight transportation modes: policy analysis, formulation and evaluation; planning; interaction with the political, socioeconomic and physical environment; design, management and evaluation of transportation systems. Topics are approached from any discipline or perspective: economics, engineering, sociology, psychology, etc. Case studies, survey and expository papers are included, as are articles which contribute to unification of the field, or to an understanding of the comparative aspects of different systems. Papers which assess the scope for technological innovation within a social or political framework are also published. The journal is international, and places equal emphasis on the problems of industrialized and non-industrialized regions. Part A''s aims and scope are complementary to Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies and Part D: Transport and Environment. Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. The complete set forms the most cohesive and comprehensive reference of current research in transportation science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信