Planning for livable compact vertical cities: A quantitative systematic review of the impact of urban geometry on thermal and visual comfort in high-rise precincts

IF 10.5 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Helen Caswell , Sara Alidoust , Jonathan Corcoran
{"title":"Planning for livable compact vertical cities: A quantitative systematic review of the impact of urban geometry on thermal and visual comfort in high-rise precincts","authors":"Helen Caswell ,&nbsp;Sara Alidoust ,&nbsp;Jonathan Corcoran","doi":"10.1016/j.scs.2024.106007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Globally, urbanisation and population growth trends are fundamentally reshaping cities. More compact vertical urban forms are emerging in a greater diversity of locations. However, research since the 1960s has consistently raised questions about the health and wellbeing consequences of living the “high life”. The Covid-19 pandemic also brought into sharp focus potential vulnerabilities. A quantitative systematic literature review process has identified the current state of research on high-rise (HR) precincts with respect to four key environmental quality objectives that have implications for health and wellbeing - thermal comfort, daylighting, visual privacy, and outlook. The review selected 72 studies and identified widely accepted and proven concepts, methods, and variables; correlations; and gaps in the current literature. Broad ranging evidence to support the setting of planning and urban design parameters in HR precincts with respect to urban heat, ventilation, and daylighting was identified, but there is limited evidence to support measures aimed at supporting visual privacy, and outlook. Research has confirmed associations between the objectives and a limited number of urban geometry variables including building height. Increasingly, green surface cover is of interest but the relative benefits of green strategies over urban form strategies is yet to be proven in a range of climate contexts. A person-environment fit research framework is presented to support multi-objective optimisation and cross-cutting research connecting urban planning, urban physics, and urban health related research. The integration of post-occupancy evaluations to ensure that lived experience, satisfaction, and preferences are considered in the weighting of objectives is advocated.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48659,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Cities and Society","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 106007"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Cities and Society","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221067072400831X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Globally, urbanisation and population growth trends are fundamentally reshaping cities. More compact vertical urban forms are emerging in a greater diversity of locations. However, research since the 1960s has consistently raised questions about the health and wellbeing consequences of living the “high life”. The Covid-19 pandemic also brought into sharp focus potential vulnerabilities. A quantitative systematic literature review process has identified the current state of research on high-rise (HR) precincts with respect to four key environmental quality objectives that have implications for health and wellbeing - thermal comfort, daylighting, visual privacy, and outlook. The review selected 72 studies and identified widely accepted and proven concepts, methods, and variables; correlations; and gaps in the current literature. Broad ranging evidence to support the setting of planning and urban design parameters in HR precincts with respect to urban heat, ventilation, and daylighting was identified, but there is limited evidence to support measures aimed at supporting visual privacy, and outlook. Research has confirmed associations between the objectives and a limited number of urban geometry variables including building height. Increasingly, green surface cover is of interest but the relative benefits of green strategies over urban form strategies is yet to be proven in a range of climate contexts. A person-environment fit research framework is presented to support multi-objective optimisation and cross-cutting research connecting urban planning, urban physics, and urban health related research. The integration of post-occupancy evaluations to ensure that lived experience, satisfaction, and preferences are considered in the weighting of objectives is advocated.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sustainable Cities and Society
Sustainable Cities and Society Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
22.00
自引率
13.70%
发文量
810
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: Sustainable Cities and Society (SCS) is an international journal that focuses on fundamental and applied research to promote environmentally sustainable and socially resilient cities. The journal welcomes cross-cutting, multi-disciplinary research in various areas, including: 1. Smart cities and resilient environments; 2. Alternative/clean energy sources, energy distribution, distributed energy generation, and energy demand reduction/management; 3. Monitoring and improving air quality in built environment and cities (e.g., healthy built environment and air quality management); 4. Energy efficient, low/zero carbon, and green buildings/communities; 5. Climate change mitigation and adaptation in urban environments; 6. Green infrastructure and BMPs; 7. Environmental Footprint accounting and management; 8. Urban agriculture and forestry; 9. ICT, smart grid and intelligent infrastructure; 10. Urban design/planning, regulations, legislation, certification, economics, and policy; 11. Social aspects, impacts and resiliency of cities; 12. Behavior monitoring, analysis and change within urban communities; 13. Health monitoring and improvement; 14. Nexus issues related to sustainable cities and societies; 15. Smart city governance; 16. Decision Support Systems for trade-off and uncertainty analysis for improved management of cities and society; 17. Big data, machine learning, and artificial intelligence applications and case studies; 18. Critical infrastructure protection, including security, privacy, forensics, and reliability issues of cyber-physical systems. 19. Water footprint reduction and urban water distribution, harvesting, treatment, reuse and management; 20. Waste reduction and recycling; 21. Wastewater collection, treatment and recycling; 22. Smart, clean and healthy transportation systems and infrastructure;
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信