International border fences and walls negatively affect wildlife: A review

IF 4.9 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Cole Sennett, Carol L. Chambers
{"title":"International border fences and walls negatively affect wildlife: A review","authors":"Cole Sennett,&nbsp;Carol L. Chambers","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110957","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Since 2001 there has been a global increase in border barrier (fences, walls) construction, most often for border security and to dissuade human access. In this review we summarize effects of anthropogenic international border barriers on wildlife, identify whether issues of habitat fragmentation, gene flow, water access, climate change, and conservation were considered, and how animal size and mobility influenced response to these barriers. We conducted a literature review for studies describing effects of international border barriers on animals and categorized information about wildlife species, barriers and their effects. We found 42 peer-reviewed journal articles that represented studies from four continents (Africa, Asia, Europe, North America) or referenced barriers globally. All articles were published after 2006, indicating increased interest in wildlife in the context of border barriers. Barrier heights ranged from 1.5 to 8 m. Most studies focused on large mammals (≥25 kg) of high mobility. Habitat fragmentation and conservation issues were most frequently considered, with fewer discussing issues of gene flow, water as a limiting resource, or effects of climate change. Ten of 29 wildlife species had decreasing populations and were listed as at risk. Research on the ecological effects of these barriers on wildlife is thus inadequate for identifying threats given the current extensive border fortification globally, especially in the last decade. Barriers presented a negative effect for mobile species and contributed to the decline of animal populations, including those identified as threatened or endangered. Recommendations to prevent further degradation of habitat include cross-border collaboration, creation of peace parks, use of technologically advanced surveillance instead of physical barriers, placing fences in areas that would not disrupt wildlife migration routes, creating wildlife-friendly openings in fences, and wildlife-friendly fencing.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55375,"journal":{"name":"Biological Conservation","volume":"302 ","pages":"Article 110957"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320724005226","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since 2001 there has been a global increase in border barrier (fences, walls) construction, most often for border security and to dissuade human access. In this review we summarize effects of anthropogenic international border barriers on wildlife, identify whether issues of habitat fragmentation, gene flow, water access, climate change, and conservation were considered, and how animal size and mobility influenced response to these barriers. We conducted a literature review for studies describing effects of international border barriers on animals and categorized information about wildlife species, barriers and their effects. We found 42 peer-reviewed journal articles that represented studies from four continents (Africa, Asia, Europe, North America) or referenced barriers globally. All articles were published after 2006, indicating increased interest in wildlife in the context of border barriers. Barrier heights ranged from 1.5 to 8 m. Most studies focused on large mammals (≥25 kg) of high mobility. Habitat fragmentation and conservation issues were most frequently considered, with fewer discussing issues of gene flow, water as a limiting resource, or effects of climate change. Ten of 29 wildlife species had decreasing populations and were listed as at risk. Research on the ecological effects of these barriers on wildlife is thus inadequate for identifying threats given the current extensive border fortification globally, especially in the last decade. Barriers presented a negative effect for mobile species and contributed to the decline of animal populations, including those identified as threatened or endangered. Recommendations to prevent further degradation of habitat include cross-border collaboration, creation of peace parks, use of technologically advanced surveillance instead of physical barriers, placing fences in areas that would not disrupt wildlife migration routes, creating wildlife-friendly openings in fences, and wildlife-friendly fencing.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biological Conservation
Biological Conservation 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
295
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Biological Conservation is an international leading journal in the discipline of conservation biology. The journal publishes articles spanning a diverse range of fields that contribute to the biological, sociological, and economic dimensions of conservation and natural resource management. The primary aim of Biological Conservation is the publication of high-quality papers that advance the science and practice of conservation, or which demonstrate the application of conservation principles for natural resource management and policy. Therefore it will be of interest to a broad international readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信