Evaluation of interlocking block pavement performance under varying construction conditions by model chamber tests

IF 6.5 2区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Inhyun Kim, Choong-Ki Chung, Jung-Hyun Ryu
{"title":"Evaluation of interlocking block pavement performance under varying construction conditions by model chamber tests","authors":"Inhyun Kim,&nbsp;Choong-Ki Chung,&nbsp;Jung-Hyun Ryu","doi":"10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e04067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As the demand for interlocking block pavements (IBPs) grows to accommodate diverse traffic loads, it is crucial to comprehensively understand how construction conditions, such as block thickness, joint width, and bedding thickness, affect IBP performance. This study addresses these factors through a series of repeated loading tests on model IBPs constructed with bedding thicknesses of 30, 50, and 80 mm and joint widths of 5 and 8 mm for 100 mm-thick general blocks, and bedding thicknesses of 50, 80, and 110 mm with a joint width of 5 mm for 160 mm-thick heavy-duty blocks. The performance of IBPs was evaluated based on deflection resistance, load-dispersion ability, and interlocking effect, the latter being assessed through the relative deflection of adjoining blocks, a key mechanism for load resistance in IBPs. The results demonstrated that an enhanced interlocking effect was achievable with a bedding thickness of 50 mm and a joint width of 5 mm for general blocks. Additionally, heavy-duty blocks required an increased bedding thickness of 80 mm to achieve greater interlocking. Under these conditions, the blocks rotated sufficiently to produce an arching effect and higher relative deflection. Conversely, IBPs constructed under inadequate conditions exhibited rutting failures, with a maximum block uplift of 0.374 mm due to excessive stress transmission to the base and bedding sand migration. Finally, the elastic modulus, estimated from transmitted stress, reached higher values of 5417.06 and 2075.45 MPa for general and heavy-duty blocks, respectively, under optimal construction conditions. This study highlights the importance of construction factors in ensuring IBP performance and suggests that both deflection and interlocking effect should be considered key performance indicators.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9641,"journal":{"name":"Case Studies in Construction Materials","volume":"22 ","pages":"Article e04067"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Studies in Construction Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214509524012191","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As the demand for interlocking block pavements (IBPs) grows to accommodate diverse traffic loads, it is crucial to comprehensively understand how construction conditions, such as block thickness, joint width, and bedding thickness, affect IBP performance. This study addresses these factors through a series of repeated loading tests on model IBPs constructed with bedding thicknesses of 30, 50, and 80 mm and joint widths of 5 and 8 mm for 100 mm-thick general blocks, and bedding thicknesses of 50, 80, and 110 mm with a joint width of 5 mm for 160 mm-thick heavy-duty blocks. The performance of IBPs was evaluated based on deflection resistance, load-dispersion ability, and interlocking effect, the latter being assessed through the relative deflection of adjoining blocks, a key mechanism for load resistance in IBPs. The results demonstrated that an enhanced interlocking effect was achievable with a bedding thickness of 50 mm and a joint width of 5 mm for general blocks. Additionally, heavy-duty blocks required an increased bedding thickness of 80 mm to achieve greater interlocking. Under these conditions, the blocks rotated sufficiently to produce an arching effect and higher relative deflection. Conversely, IBPs constructed under inadequate conditions exhibited rutting failures, with a maximum block uplift of 0.374 mm due to excessive stress transmission to the base and bedding sand migration. Finally, the elastic modulus, estimated from transmitted stress, reached higher values of 5417.06 and 2075.45 MPa for general and heavy-duty blocks, respectively, under optimal construction conditions. This study highlights the importance of construction factors in ensuring IBP performance and suggests that both deflection and interlocking effect should be considered key performance indicators.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
19.40%
发文量
842
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Case Studies in Construction Materials provides a forum for the rapid publication of short, structured Case Studies on construction materials. In addition, the journal also publishes related Short Communications, Full length research article and Comprehensive review papers (by invitation). The journal will provide an essential compendium of case studies for practicing engineers, designers, researchers and other practitioners who are interested in all aspects construction materials. The journal will publish new and novel case studies, but will also provide a forum for the publication of high quality descriptions of classic construction material problems and solutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信