Neoadjuvant cytokine (IRX-2) immunotherapy for resectable oral cavity carcinoma: Final results of the INSPIRE trial

Gregory T. Wolf , Emily Bellile , Celine Mauquoi , Ariane Nguyen , Maureen Sartor , Siyu Liu , Laura Rozek , Jonathan B. McHugh
{"title":"Neoadjuvant cytokine (IRX-2) immunotherapy for resectable oral cavity carcinoma: Final results of the INSPIRE trial","authors":"Gregory T. Wolf ,&nbsp;Emily Bellile ,&nbsp;Celine Mauquoi ,&nbsp;Ariane Nguyen ,&nbsp;Maureen Sartor ,&nbsp;Siyu Liu ,&nbsp;Laura Rozek ,&nbsp;Jonathan B. McHugh","doi":"10.1016/j.oor.2024.100706","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Oral cavity squamous carcinoma is characterized by alterations in cell mediated tumor immunity including a lack of immune reactive tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). To determine if a novel neoadjuvant injection of a multi-cytokine biologic (IRX-2) can restore immune reactivity and enhance patient survival, a randomized Phase 2 clinical trial was conducted in patients with Stage II-IV OSCC undergoing surgical resection (NCT 02609386).</div><div>The intention-to-treat (ITT) enrollment included 105 previously untreated patients, however 9 were excluded from the secondary endpoint analysis group for wrong histology, no treatment or patient refusal. A total of 96 patients comprised the final analytic group and were randomized (2:1) to receive the IRX-2 regimen (Regimen 1) compared to the identical regimen without IRX-2 cytokines (Regimen 2). Toxicity, tumor and immune responses, event-free (EFS) and overall (OS) survival were determined. Kaplan-Meier estimates for OS and EFS and inferential comparisons and asymptotoic log-rank testing between the two treatments were determined.</div><div>In prior preliminary analysis, significant increases in TILs and DMBT1 gene expression were noted for the IRX arm. No significant correlations of immunologic or tumor responses with survival outcomes were found. For the ITT population (n = 105) there were no significant differences in OS by treatment arm. OS [95 % CI] at 48 mo. was 70.4 [57.6, 80.0] vs 66.3 [47.5, 79.8] mos. (Regimen 1 vs Regimen 2, respectively).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Significant differences in survival were not seen, however, the trial demonstrated the feasibility of the neoadjuvant immunotherapy and differing immune modulation in each treatment arm. No correlations of immune biomarkers or tumor size changes with survival outcomes were identified.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94378,"journal":{"name":"Oral Oncology Reports","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100706"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral Oncology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772906024005521","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Oral cavity squamous carcinoma is characterized by alterations in cell mediated tumor immunity including a lack of immune reactive tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). To determine if a novel neoadjuvant injection of a multi-cytokine biologic (IRX-2) can restore immune reactivity and enhance patient survival, a randomized Phase 2 clinical trial was conducted in patients with Stage II-IV OSCC undergoing surgical resection (NCT 02609386).
The intention-to-treat (ITT) enrollment included 105 previously untreated patients, however 9 were excluded from the secondary endpoint analysis group for wrong histology, no treatment or patient refusal. A total of 96 patients comprised the final analytic group and were randomized (2:1) to receive the IRX-2 regimen (Regimen 1) compared to the identical regimen without IRX-2 cytokines (Regimen 2). Toxicity, tumor and immune responses, event-free (EFS) and overall (OS) survival were determined. Kaplan-Meier estimates for OS and EFS and inferential comparisons and asymptotoic log-rank testing between the two treatments were determined.
In prior preliminary analysis, significant increases in TILs and DMBT1 gene expression were noted for the IRX arm. No significant correlations of immunologic or tumor responses with survival outcomes were found. For the ITT population (n = 105) there were no significant differences in OS by treatment arm. OS [95 % CI] at 48 mo. was 70.4 [57.6, 80.0] vs 66.3 [47.5, 79.8] mos. (Regimen 1 vs Regimen 2, respectively).

Conclusions

Significant differences in survival were not seen, however, the trial demonstrated the feasibility of the neoadjuvant immunotherapy and differing immune modulation in each treatment arm. No correlations of immune biomarkers or tumor size changes with survival outcomes were identified.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信