Can large language models meet the challenge of generating school-level questions?

Q1 Social Sciences
Subhankar Maity, Aniket Deroy, Sudeshna Sarkar
{"title":"Can large language models meet the challenge of generating school-level questions?","authors":"Subhankar Maity,&nbsp;Aniket Deroy,&nbsp;Sudeshna Sarkar","doi":"10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the realm of education, crafting appropriate questions for examinations is a meticulous and time-consuming task that is crucial for assessing students' understanding of the subject matter. This paper explores the potential of leveraging large language models (LLMs) to automate question generation in the educational domain. Specifically, we focus on generating educational questions from contexts extracted from school-level textbooks. Our study aims to prompt LLMs such as GPT-4 Turbo, GPT-3.5 Turbo, Llama-2-70B, Llama-3.1-405B, and Gemini Pro to generate a complete set of questions for each context, potentially streamlining the question generation process for educators. We performed a human evaluation of the generated questions, assessing their <em>coverage</em>, <em>grammaticality</em>, <em>usefulness</em>, <em>answerability</em>, and <em>relevance</em>. Additionally, we prompted LLMs to generate questions based on Bloom's revised taxonomy, categorizing and evaluating these questions according to their cognitive complexity and learning objectives. We applied both zero-shot and eight-shot prompting techniques. These efforts provide insight into the efficacy of LLMs in automated question generation and their potential in assessing students' cognitive abilities across various school-level subjects. The results show that employing an eight-shot technique improves the performance of human evaluation metrics for the generated complete set of questions and helps generate questions that are better aligned with Bloom's revised taxonomy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34469,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100370"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666920X25000104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the realm of education, crafting appropriate questions for examinations is a meticulous and time-consuming task that is crucial for assessing students' understanding of the subject matter. This paper explores the potential of leveraging large language models (LLMs) to automate question generation in the educational domain. Specifically, we focus on generating educational questions from contexts extracted from school-level textbooks. Our study aims to prompt LLMs such as GPT-4 Turbo, GPT-3.5 Turbo, Llama-2-70B, Llama-3.1-405B, and Gemini Pro to generate a complete set of questions for each context, potentially streamlining the question generation process for educators. We performed a human evaluation of the generated questions, assessing their coverage, grammaticality, usefulness, answerability, and relevance. Additionally, we prompted LLMs to generate questions based on Bloom's revised taxonomy, categorizing and evaluating these questions according to their cognitive complexity and learning objectives. We applied both zero-shot and eight-shot prompting techniques. These efforts provide insight into the efficacy of LLMs in automated question generation and their potential in assessing students' cognitive abilities across various school-level subjects. The results show that employing an eight-shot technique improves the performance of human evaluation metrics for the generated complete set of questions and helps generate questions that are better aligned with Bloom's revised taxonomy.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
50 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信