Watts happening to work? The labour market effects of South Africa’s electricity crisis

IF 14.2 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Haroon Bhorat, Timothy Köhler
{"title":"Watts happening to work? The labour market effects of South Africa’s electricity crisis","authors":"Haroon Bhorat,&nbsp;Timothy Köhler","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2024.108119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Frequent electricity outages threaten to impede the benefits of expanded access achieved by many developing countries in recent decades. A large literature documents these negative effects, however almost none consider labour market effects. This paper merges labour force survey microdata with high-frequency electricity supply and demand data to provide the first descriptive and causal estimates of the relationships between outages and labour market outcomes in South Africa, a country characterized by frequent, severe outages referred to as load shedding. We reveal negative associations with both employment and working hours, with the former being more pronounced. Both are not evident for low outage levels but increase with outage intensity. We document significant heterogeneity across firm sizes and industries, highlighting the vulnerability of workers in small firms. Using a Difference-in-Differences design, we exploit variation induced by a unique mitigation policy in Cape Town to show that outage mitigation significantly increases both employment and working hours, but more so the former, consistent with our descriptive estimates. We do not find heterogeneous employment effects by firm size, but highlight meaningful working hours effects for workers in small firms only, again highlighting their vulnerability. No evidence of heterogeneity across industries is found, and causal effects on hourly wages or monthly earnings could not be credibly identified. Overall, this study provides evidence of the negative labour market effects of power outages in developing countries, particularly for workers in small firms, on both the extensive and intensive margins.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"142 ","pages":"Article 108119"},"PeriodicalIF":14.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988324008284","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Frequent electricity outages threaten to impede the benefits of expanded access achieved by many developing countries in recent decades. A large literature documents these negative effects, however almost none consider labour market effects. This paper merges labour force survey microdata with high-frequency electricity supply and demand data to provide the first descriptive and causal estimates of the relationships between outages and labour market outcomes in South Africa, a country characterized by frequent, severe outages referred to as load shedding. We reveal negative associations with both employment and working hours, with the former being more pronounced. Both are not evident for low outage levels but increase with outage intensity. We document significant heterogeneity across firm sizes and industries, highlighting the vulnerability of workers in small firms. Using a Difference-in-Differences design, we exploit variation induced by a unique mitigation policy in Cape Town to show that outage mitigation significantly increases both employment and working hours, but more so the former, consistent with our descriptive estimates. We do not find heterogeneous employment effects by firm size, but highlight meaningful working hours effects for workers in small firms only, again highlighting their vulnerability. No evidence of heterogeneity across industries is found, and causal effects on hourly wages or monthly earnings could not be credibly identified. Overall, this study provides evidence of the negative labour market effects of power outages in developing countries, particularly for workers in small firms, on both the extensive and intensive margins.
瓦特在工作吗?南非电力危机对劳动力市场的影响
频繁的停电可能会阻碍许多发展中国家近几十年来扩大电力供应所带来的好处。大量文献记录了这些负面影响,但几乎没有文献考虑到劳动力市场的影响。本文将劳动力调查微观数据与高频电力供应和需求数据相结合,提供了南非停电与劳动力市场结果之间关系的第一个描述性和因果估计,南非是一个以频繁、严重停电为特征的国家,被称为减负荷。我们揭示了就业和工作时间之间的负相关关系,前者更为明显。两者在低停机水平下不明显,但随着停机强度的增加而增加。我们记录了企业规模和行业之间的显著异质性,突出了小企业工人的脆弱性。使用差异中的差异设计,我们利用开普敦独特的缓解政策引起的变化来表明,停电缓解显着增加了就业和工作时间,但前者更多,与我们的描述性估计一致。我们没有发现企业规模的异质性就业效应,但只强调了小公司工人的有意义的工作时间效应,再次强调了他们的脆弱性。没有发现跨行业异质性的证据,也无法可靠地确定对小时工资或月收入的因果影响。总的来说,这项研究提供了发展中国家电力中断对劳动力市场的负面影响的证据,特别是对小公司的工人来说,无论是广泛的还是密集的利润。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Economics
Energy Economics ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
18.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
524
期刊介绍: Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信