Consumer attitudes towards retailers’ operational response to COVID-19: Empirical analysis of Colombian grocery chains

Johanna Amaya , Trilce Encarnación
{"title":"Consumer attitudes towards retailers’ operational response to COVID-19: Empirical analysis of Colombian grocery chains","authors":"Johanna Amaya ,&nbsp;Trilce Encarnación","doi":"10.1016/j.latran.2025.100028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper presents analyses of consumers’ experiences and sentiments concerning operational initiatives implemented by grocery retailers during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. Drawing from Grounded Theory (GT) and Construal Level Theory (CLT), Instagram posts and comments from grocery chains in Colombia were analyzed to capture the operational initiatives implemented by these retailers and consumer attitudes toward them, during the crisis. The analysis of the unstructured data shows that grocery retailers went beyond government mandates to continue operating, showing their flexibility and ability to adapt to challenging conditions. Consumers had a better attitude towards initiatives that were presented as beneficial instead of restrictive, for which consumers expressed negative sentiment. Moreover, consumers had the best experience and perceptions of Limited Assortment Retailers compared to other retailer types as consumers became more conscious of their expenses during the crisis and responded to appeals related to their culture and concerns. Furthermore, we were able to see consumers’ sentiments change during the analyzed period as a result of retailers’ new initiatives or innovative ways of offering their products and services. The paper closes with recommendations for grocery retailers to ensure the best results when implementing initiatives in times of crisis that would impact consumer experiences.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100868,"journal":{"name":"Latin American Transport Studies","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100028"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Latin American Transport Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950024925000058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents analyses of consumers’ experiences and sentiments concerning operational initiatives implemented by grocery retailers during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. Drawing from Grounded Theory (GT) and Construal Level Theory (CLT), Instagram posts and comments from grocery chains in Colombia were analyzed to capture the operational initiatives implemented by these retailers and consumer attitudes toward them, during the crisis. The analysis of the unstructured data shows that grocery retailers went beyond government mandates to continue operating, showing their flexibility and ability to adapt to challenging conditions. Consumers had a better attitude towards initiatives that were presented as beneficial instead of restrictive, for which consumers expressed negative sentiment. Moreover, consumers had the best experience and perceptions of Limited Assortment Retailers compared to other retailer types as consumers became more conscious of their expenses during the crisis and responded to appeals related to their culture and concerns. Furthermore, we were able to see consumers’ sentiments change during the analyzed period as a result of retailers’ new initiatives or innovative ways of offering their products and services. The paper closes with recommendations for grocery retailers to ensure the best results when implementing initiatives in times of crisis that would impact consumer experiences.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信