Multiscale systemic risk spillovers in Chinese energy market: Evidence from a tail-event driven network analysis

IF 13.6 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Sitong Zhou , Di Yuan , Feipeng Zhang
{"title":"Multiscale systemic risk spillovers in Chinese energy market: Evidence from a tail-event driven network analysis","authors":"Sitong Zhou ,&nbsp;Di Yuan ,&nbsp;Feipeng Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2024.108151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper investigates multiscale systemic risk spillovers in the Chinese energy market by combing the maximal overlap discrete wavelet transform (MODWT) with the tail-event driven network (TENET) model, which could analyze tail events and multiscale network dynamics. It creates multiscale extreme risk spillover networks consisting of energy companies in the coal, oil, natural gas, and new energy. To examine the transmission of risk between different subsectors and companies within the network, we assess overall, subsector, and company-level connectedness across different time scales, respectively. Empirical results show the OPEC oil production cut in 2017, the Sino-US trade war in 2018, the COVID-19 outbreak in 2020, and the Russia-Ukraine conflict started in 2022 boosted overall connectedness and concentration, suggesting that systemic risk connectedness tends to be intersectoral during market crises. The coal subsector appears to be the most integrated and exposed to systemic risk in the short term, while the oil subsector acts as the most influential subsector in the long term. The short-term risk spillover of the new energy subsector from 2018 to 2020 affects all energy subsectors, but it has moderated. The new energy subsector has a greater long-term impact on the energy market after 2020. Brent crude oil and domestic coal and LNG prices in China significantly drive systemic risk transmission in the Chinese energy sector, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic and the Russia-Ukraine conflict. This research may benefit governments, regulators, energy companies, and investors under different market conditions and investment horizons.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"142 ","pages":"Article 108151"},"PeriodicalIF":13.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988324008600","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper investigates multiscale systemic risk spillovers in the Chinese energy market by combing the maximal overlap discrete wavelet transform (MODWT) with the tail-event driven network (TENET) model, which could analyze tail events and multiscale network dynamics. It creates multiscale extreme risk spillover networks consisting of energy companies in the coal, oil, natural gas, and new energy. To examine the transmission of risk between different subsectors and companies within the network, we assess overall, subsector, and company-level connectedness across different time scales, respectively. Empirical results show the OPEC oil production cut in 2017, the Sino-US trade war in 2018, the COVID-19 outbreak in 2020, and the Russia-Ukraine conflict started in 2022 boosted overall connectedness and concentration, suggesting that systemic risk connectedness tends to be intersectoral during market crises. The coal subsector appears to be the most integrated and exposed to systemic risk in the short term, while the oil subsector acts as the most influential subsector in the long term. The short-term risk spillover of the new energy subsector from 2018 to 2020 affects all energy subsectors, but it has moderated. The new energy subsector has a greater long-term impact on the energy market after 2020. Brent crude oil and domestic coal and LNG prices in China significantly drive systemic risk transmission in the Chinese energy sector, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic and the Russia-Ukraine conflict. This research may benefit governments, regulators, energy companies, and investors under different market conditions and investment horizons.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Economics
Energy Economics ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
18.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
524
期刊介绍: Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信