Sources of soil organic carbon under Eucalyptus silvopastures and other land-use systems in Brazilian Oxisols

IF 3.1 2区 农林科学 Q2 SOIL SCIENCE
Felipe M. Pinheiro , P.K. Ramachandran Nair , Vimala D. Nair , Rafael G. Tonucci , Regis P. Venturin
{"title":"Sources of soil organic carbon under Eucalyptus silvopastures and other land-use systems in Brazilian Oxisols","authors":"Felipe M. Pinheiro ,&nbsp;P.K. Ramachandran Nair ,&nbsp;Vimala D. Nair ,&nbsp;Rafael G. Tonucci ,&nbsp;Regis P. Venturin","doi":"10.1016/j.geodrs.2024.e00907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Silvopastoral systems (SPS) incorporating non-native tree species such as Eucalyptus are increasingly being adopted in the Cerrado region of Brazil. The climate-change mitigation potential of the practice, although hypothesized, has not been assessed vigorously. The objective of this research was to measure the extent of SOC accumulation under SPS involving C3 and C4 plants and other prevalent land-use systems in an Oxisol-dominated location in Minas Gerais, Brazil. We determined the overall δ13C in three soil fraction-size groups within six land-use systems. These systems consisted of 8-year-old planted forests, native forest, managed pastures, and three variations of 8-year-old SPS with diverse tree-planting layouts. In the SPS and planted forest treatments, the tree species was Eucalyptus hybrid, and <em>Urochloa decumbens</em> was the grass species in the SPS and pasture treatments. For each treatment, soil samples were collected at depths of 0–10, 10–30, 30–60, and 60–100 cm. These samples were fractionated into three size classes (2000-250 μm, 250-53 μm, and &lt;53 μm) and analyzed for δ13C. The native forest had higher C3 contribution in the topsoil layers. The highest C3 derived SOC stock up to 1 m depth was in the pasture (137 Mg ha<sup>-1</sup>), and the lowest in the forest (74 Mg ha<sup>-1</sup>). The pasture also had the highest C4 derived SOC stock and the forest the lowest, but not significantly. The SPS had intermediate values. We infer that the study site had a mixed vegetation in the past, and after the conversion of the land to planted forest/SPS/pasture, the “native” SOC stock could be maintained better in a well-managed pasture than in a degraded native forest. The higher C3-derived SOC stock in the pasture treatment suggests that managed SPS could help retain more soil C in a stable form than in degraded forests.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56001,"journal":{"name":"Geoderma Regional","volume":"40 ","pages":"Article e00907"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoderma Regional","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352009424001548","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Silvopastoral systems (SPS) incorporating non-native tree species such as Eucalyptus are increasingly being adopted in the Cerrado region of Brazil. The climate-change mitigation potential of the practice, although hypothesized, has not been assessed vigorously. The objective of this research was to measure the extent of SOC accumulation under SPS involving C3 and C4 plants and other prevalent land-use systems in an Oxisol-dominated location in Minas Gerais, Brazil. We determined the overall δ13C in three soil fraction-size groups within six land-use systems. These systems consisted of 8-year-old planted forests, native forest, managed pastures, and three variations of 8-year-old SPS with diverse tree-planting layouts. In the SPS and planted forest treatments, the tree species was Eucalyptus hybrid, and Urochloa decumbens was the grass species in the SPS and pasture treatments. For each treatment, soil samples were collected at depths of 0–10, 10–30, 30–60, and 60–100 cm. These samples were fractionated into three size classes (2000-250 μm, 250-53 μm, and <53 μm) and analyzed for δ13C. The native forest had higher C3 contribution in the topsoil layers. The highest C3 derived SOC stock up to 1 m depth was in the pasture (137 Mg ha-1), and the lowest in the forest (74 Mg ha-1). The pasture also had the highest C4 derived SOC stock and the forest the lowest, but not significantly. The SPS had intermediate values. We infer that the study site had a mixed vegetation in the past, and after the conversion of the land to planted forest/SPS/pasture, the “native” SOC stock could be maintained better in a well-managed pasture than in a degraded native forest. The higher C3-derived SOC stock in the pasture treatment suggests that managed SPS could help retain more soil C in a stable form than in degraded forests.
巴西奥索索州桉树林场和其他土地利用系统下土壤有机碳的来源
巴西塞拉多地区越来越多地采用含有桉树等非本地树种的森林系统(SPS)。这种做法的减缓气候变化的潜力虽然是假设的,但尚未得到有力的评估。本研究旨在测量巴西米纳斯吉拉斯州一个以oxisolo植物为主的地区,C3和C4植物和其他普遍的土地利用系统在SPS下的有机碳积累程度。我们测定了6种土地利用系统中3个土壤组分的总δ13C。这些系统包括8年树龄的人工林、原生林、管理牧场和3种具有不同植树布局的8年树龄SPS。在SPS和人工林处理中,树种为桉树杂交种,而在SPS和牧场处理中,禾本科种为卧草。每个处理分别在0-10、10-30、30-60和60-100 cm深度采集土壤样品。将样品分为2000-250 μm、250-53 μm和<;53 μm 3个粒径级,进行δ13C分析。原生林对表层土壤的C3贡献较高。1 m深度下C3衍生SOC储量最高的是草地(137 Mg ha-1),最低的是森林(74 Mg ha-1)。草地C4衍生碳储量最高,森林最低,但差异不显著。SPS具有中间值。研究区过去为混合植被区,经过人工林/草地/草地的改造后,管理良好的草地比退化的原生林更能维持“原生”碳储量。牧草处理下较高的c3来源的有机碳储量表明,与退化森林相比,有管理的SPS可以帮助保持更多稳定形式的土壤C。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geoderma Regional
Geoderma Regional Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Soil Science
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
7.30%
发文量
122
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: Global issues require studies and solutions on national and regional levels. Geoderma Regional focuses on studies that increase understanding and advance our scientific knowledge of soils in all regions of the world. The journal embraces every aspect of soil science and welcomes reviews of regional progress.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信