Organic carbon stocks across various land use systems in Sandy Ultisols and Oxisols in Brazil

IF 3.1 2区 农林科学 Q2 SOIL SCIENCE
Maria Cecília Vieira Totti , Yuri Lopes Zinn , Sérgio Henrique Godinho Silva , Bruno Montoani Silva , Fernanda Almeida Bócoli , Vanêssa Lopes de Faria , Andrés Olaya Montes , Salvador Francisco Acuña-Guzman , Alexandre Uezu , Laury Cullen Junior , Vinícius Ferreira Fernandes , Junior Cesar Avanzi
{"title":"Organic carbon stocks across various land use systems in Sandy Ultisols and Oxisols in Brazil","authors":"Maria Cecília Vieira Totti ,&nbsp;Yuri Lopes Zinn ,&nbsp;Sérgio Henrique Godinho Silva ,&nbsp;Bruno Montoani Silva ,&nbsp;Fernanda Almeida Bócoli ,&nbsp;Vanêssa Lopes de Faria ,&nbsp;Andrés Olaya Montes ,&nbsp;Salvador Francisco Acuña-Guzman ,&nbsp;Alexandre Uezu ,&nbsp;Laury Cullen Junior ,&nbsp;Vinícius Ferreira Fernandes ,&nbsp;Junior Cesar Avanzi","doi":"10.1016/j.geodrs.2025.e00924","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Soil organic carbon (SOC) is a major carbon pool that can be easily affected by land use change, especially in tropical humid sandy soils, where organic decomposition is fast and SOC stabilization is weak. Here, we assessed SOC stocks in coarse-textured Oxisols and Ultisols under six contrasting land uses in western São Paulo, Brazil, an area marked by warm temperatures, within the Atlantic Rainforest biome. Soils were sampled for bulk density and SOC content to a 1-m depth in areas under a) primary native forest, b) native forest restoration, c) pastures, d) sugarcane, e) cassava, and f) annual crops. Even under primary forests, SOC stocks were low relatively to other Brazilian soils under cooler climates and with finer textures, and the effect of land use changes varied with soil type. In both soil types, the lowest SOC stocks occurred under cassava cultivation, a traditional indigenous crop with low soil coverage and which requires intensive soil disturbance for harvesting. In Ultisols, forest restoration and sugarcane presented the highest SOC stocks, whereas in Oxisols, the highest stocks occurred under primary forests and pastures, suggesting that gramineous perennial crops with little soil disturbance are effective in preserving or even sequestering SOC in these areas. When only primary forests are compared, SOC stocks in Oxisols were higher than in Ultisols, probably due the effect of higher soil bulk densities on the Ultisols, rendering root development and thus SOC accrual in subsoil more difficult.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56001,"journal":{"name":"Geoderma Regional","volume":"40 ","pages":"Article e00924"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoderma Regional","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352009425000094","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soil organic carbon (SOC) is a major carbon pool that can be easily affected by land use change, especially in tropical humid sandy soils, where organic decomposition is fast and SOC stabilization is weak. Here, we assessed SOC stocks in coarse-textured Oxisols and Ultisols under six contrasting land uses in western São Paulo, Brazil, an area marked by warm temperatures, within the Atlantic Rainforest biome. Soils were sampled for bulk density and SOC content to a 1-m depth in areas under a) primary native forest, b) native forest restoration, c) pastures, d) sugarcane, e) cassava, and f) annual crops. Even under primary forests, SOC stocks were low relatively to other Brazilian soils under cooler climates and with finer textures, and the effect of land use changes varied with soil type. In both soil types, the lowest SOC stocks occurred under cassava cultivation, a traditional indigenous crop with low soil coverage and which requires intensive soil disturbance for harvesting. In Ultisols, forest restoration and sugarcane presented the highest SOC stocks, whereas in Oxisols, the highest stocks occurred under primary forests and pastures, suggesting that gramineous perennial crops with little soil disturbance are effective in preserving or even sequestering SOC in these areas. When only primary forests are compared, SOC stocks in Oxisols were higher than in Ultisols, probably due the effect of higher soil bulk densities on the Ultisols, rendering root development and thus SOC accrual in subsoil more difficult.

Abstract Image

巴西沙质Ultisols和Oxisols不同土地利用系统的有机碳储量
土壤有机碳(SOC)是易受土地利用变化影响的主要碳库,特别是在有机分解快、SOC稳定性弱的热带湿润沙质土壤中。在这里,我们评估了在大西洋热带雨林生物群系中,巴西圣保罗西部一个以温暖的温度为特征的地区,在六种不同的土地利用方式下,粗质Oxisols和Ultisols的SOC储量。在a)原始原生林、b)原生林恢复、c)牧场、d)甘蔗、e)木薯和f)一年生作物类型的土壤中取样1 m深度的土壤容重和有机碳含量。即使在原始林下,土壤有机碳储量也低于其他气候较冷、质地较细的巴西土壤,而且土地利用变化的影响因土壤类型而异。在这两种土壤类型中,种植木薯的土壤有机碳储量最低,而木薯是一种传统的本土作物,土壤覆盖度低,需要强烈的土壤干扰才能收获。土壤中有机碳储量最高的是森林恢复和甘蔗,而土壤中有机碳储量最高的是原生林和牧场,表明土壤扰动较小的禾本科多年生作物对土壤有机碳的保存甚至吸收是有效的。当只比较原生林时,氧化土的有机碳储量高于终极土,这可能是由于更高的土壤体积密度对终极土的影响,使根系发育和土壤有机碳积累在地下土壤中更加困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geoderma Regional
Geoderma Regional Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Soil Science
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
7.30%
发文量
122
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: Global issues require studies and solutions on national and regional levels. Geoderma Regional focuses on studies that increase understanding and advance our scientific knowledge of soils in all regions of the world. The journal embraces every aspect of soil science and welcomes reviews of regional progress.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信