Time in and for nature-based solutions. No quick fix solutions for complex ecological and social processes

Ina Lehmann , Julia Grosinger , Steffen Bauer , Jean Carlo Rodríguez de Francisco , Katarzyna Negacz , Jonas Hein
{"title":"Time in and for nature-based solutions. No quick fix solutions for complex ecological and social processes","authors":"Ina Lehmann ,&nbsp;Julia Grosinger ,&nbsp;Steffen Bauer ,&nbsp;Jean Carlo Rodríguez de Francisco ,&nbsp;Katarzyna Negacz ,&nbsp;Jonas Hein","doi":"10.1016/j.nbsj.2025.100219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Nature-based solutions (NbS) are an increasingly widespread tool in environment and development policies. They embody the idea that nature and natural processes can be purposefully used by humans to provide solutions to pressing environmental and social challenges. However, their potential to meet this ambition is contested, particularly in terms of the scale of the challenge, the risk of diverting attention from the need for decarbonisation, and examples of poorly implemented NbS projects. A largely overlooked but crucial factor concerning the effectiveness of NbS is time. In response to this gap, we develop a framework for systematising the ecological and social dimensions of time in NbS as well as the distinction between slow and fast processes. On this basis, we gather insights from a systematic literature review on key challenges related to slow and fast processes in both the ecological and social dimensions of time. For instance, the long maturation time of many species and ecosystems may be incompatible with the often short-term logic of NbS projects or with the dynamic character of ecosystems that may be challenging for continuous benefit provision. We also identify practical recommendations from the literature review for incorporating time into NbS design, for instance through adaptive monitoring, and we conclude with an urgent call for a more long-term perspective for NbS policies and practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100945,"journal":{"name":"Nature-Based Solutions","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100219"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature-Based Solutions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772411525000096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nature-based solutions (NbS) are an increasingly widespread tool in environment and development policies. They embody the idea that nature and natural processes can be purposefully used by humans to provide solutions to pressing environmental and social challenges. However, their potential to meet this ambition is contested, particularly in terms of the scale of the challenge, the risk of diverting attention from the need for decarbonisation, and examples of poorly implemented NbS projects. A largely overlooked but crucial factor concerning the effectiveness of NbS is time. In response to this gap, we develop a framework for systematising the ecological and social dimensions of time in NbS as well as the distinction between slow and fast processes. On this basis, we gather insights from a systematic literature review on key challenges related to slow and fast processes in both the ecological and social dimensions of time. For instance, the long maturation time of many species and ecosystems may be incompatible with the often short-term logic of NbS projects or with the dynamic character of ecosystems that may be challenging for continuous benefit provision. We also identify practical recommendations from the literature review for incorporating time into NbS design, for instance through adaptive monitoring, and we conclude with an urgent call for a more long-term perspective for NbS policies and practice.
为基于自然的解决方案投入时间。对于复杂的生态和社会过程,没有快速解决方案
基于自然的解决方案(NbS)在环境和发展政策中日益广泛使用。它们体现了这样一种理念:人类可以有目的地利用自然和自然过程,为紧迫的环境和社会挑战提供解决方案。然而,它们实现这一雄心的潜力受到质疑,特别是在挑战的规模、转移人们对脱碳需求的注意力的风险,以及国家银行项目实施不力的例子方面。与国家统计局的有效性有关的一个很大程度上被忽视但至关重要的因素是时间。为了应对这一差距,我们开发了一个框架,用于将NbS中时间的生态和社会维度以及慢速和快速过程之间的区别系统化。在此基础上,我们从系统的文献综述中收集了与时间的生态和社会维度的慢速和快速过程相关的关键挑战的见解。例如,许多物种和生态系统的漫长成熟时间可能与国家生态系统项目的短期逻辑不相容,也可能与生态系统的动态特征不相容,这可能对持续提供利益构成挑战。我们还从文献综述中确定了将时间纳入国家统计局设计的实用建议,例如通过自适应监测,我们最后迫切呼吁国家统计局政策和实践具有更长远的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信