Artemiy A. Kotov , Alexander A. Filatov , Zakhar A. Nosovets
{"title":"Cognitive architecture for F-2 companion robot to support semantic shifts and cognitive domains via scenario oppositions","authors":"Artemiy A. Kotov , Alexander A. Filatov , Zakhar A. Nosovets","doi":"10.1016/j.cogsys.2024.101320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We develop an applied cognitive architecture, which can operate on companion robots and support cognitive functions typical of higher order human communication, such as humor and cognitive domains like <em>imagination</em>, irony and <em>theory of mind</em>. In the applied studies this architecture, developed as a real-world interface for the cognitive model, operates on F-2 companion robot or runs text processing on the server without the robot. The robot constructs representation for speech, visual and tactile events in a unified way, based on the semantics representations. To simulate cognitive domains and humor, we implement parallel processing of speech syntax and semantics, so that a meaning for an alternative syntactic tree (homonymy) can be used for a humorous utterance. The parallel processing is implemented via an engine of scenarios – <em>if-then</em> operators or <em>productions</em>. The scenarios, invoked by a stimulus, compete with each other basing on the oppositions of their semantic markers. The winning scenario forms a “believable” representation of a stimulus for the robot, while the suppressed (opposed) scenarios form the representations of cognitive domains. If a stimulus is evaluated as “bad”, but an opposed scenario suggests “good” representation, this representation is used for <em>imagination</em>. If a scenario suggests an emotional interpretation and assigns “me/myself” marker, while the correct representation suggests “another” person in this position, this representation is used for <em>the theory of mind</em> – another person’s point of view. Scenarios, departing from a stimulus, are also used as an inference engine that forms derived semantic representations to be replied by the robot. This mechanism is also combined with emotional evaluation, as a rational inference may invoke emotions or shift the category of an object in the initial stimulus.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55242,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Systems Research","volume":"89 ","pages":"Article 101320"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Systems Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389041724001141","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We develop an applied cognitive architecture, which can operate on companion robots and support cognitive functions typical of higher order human communication, such as humor and cognitive domains like imagination, irony and theory of mind. In the applied studies this architecture, developed as a real-world interface for the cognitive model, operates on F-2 companion robot or runs text processing on the server without the robot. The robot constructs representation for speech, visual and tactile events in a unified way, based on the semantics representations. To simulate cognitive domains and humor, we implement parallel processing of speech syntax and semantics, so that a meaning for an alternative syntactic tree (homonymy) can be used for a humorous utterance. The parallel processing is implemented via an engine of scenarios – if-then operators or productions. The scenarios, invoked by a stimulus, compete with each other basing on the oppositions of their semantic markers. The winning scenario forms a “believable” representation of a stimulus for the robot, while the suppressed (opposed) scenarios form the representations of cognitive domains. If a stimulus is evaluated as “bad”, but an opposed scenario suggests “good” representation, this representation is used for imagination. If a scenario suggests an emotional interpretation and assigns “me/myself” marker, while the correct representation suggests “another” person in this position, this representation is used for the theory of mind – another person’s point of view. Scenarios, departing from a stimulus, are also used as an inference engine that forms derived semantic representations to be replied by the robot. This mechanism is also combined with emotional evaluation, as a rational inference may invoke emotions or shift the category of an object in the initial stimulus.
期刊介绍:
Cognitive Systems Research is dedicated to the study of human-level cognition. As such, it welcomes papers which advance the understanding, design and applications of cognitive and intelligent systems, both natural and artificial.
The journal brings together a broad community studying cognition in its many facets in vivo and in silico, across the developmental spectrum, focusing on individual capacities or on entire architectures. It aims to foster debate and integrate ideas, concepts, constructs, theories, models and techniques from across different disciplines and different perspectives on human-level cognition. The scope of interest includes the study of cognitive capacities and architectures - both brain-inspired and non-brain-inspired - and the application of cognitive systems to real-world problems as far as it offers insights relevant for the understanding of cognition.
Cognitive Systems Research therefore welcomes mature and cutting-edge research approaching cognition from a systems-oriented perspective, both theoretical and empirically-informed, in the form of original manuscripts, short communications, opinion articles, systematic reviews, and topical survey articles from the fields of Cognitive Science (including Philosophy of Cognitive Science), Artificial Intelligence/Computer Science, Cognitive Robotics, Developmental Science, Psychology, and Neuroscience and Neuromorphic Engineering. Empirical studies will be considered if they are supplemented by theoretical analyses and contributions to theory development and/or computational modelling studies.