Vahid Hamdipoor , Hoai Nam Nguyen , Bouchra Mekhaldi , Johan Parra , Jordi Badosa , Fausto Calderon Obaldia
{"title":"Experimental validation of scenario-based stochastic model predictive control of nanogrids","authors":"Vahid Hamdipoor , Hoai Nam Nguyen , Bouchra Mekhaldi , Johan Parra , Jordi Badosa , Fausto Calderon Obaldia","doi":"10.1016/j.conengprac.2025.106249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In microgrids and nanogrids, challenges arise from the inherent intermittency of renewable energy sources and the need to meet uncertain energy demand from users. To address these uncertainties, this paper investigates a two-layer, scenario-based stochastic Model Predictive Control (MPC) for a real lab-scale photovoltaic (PV)-based nanogrid. The high-level layer, which operates slowly and over longer time horizons, computes optimal reference values for the low-level layer based on predictions of uncertainty in PV generation and consumer load. The low-level layer, which operates on shorter time horizons and at higher frequencies, relies on scenario-based MPC. Scenario-based MPC has several advantages, such as not requiring prior knowledge of the underlying probability distribution. However, it can suffer from significant computational burdens, especially in real-time applications like nanogrid control. To overcome this challenge, this paper employs the Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers (ADMM) to efficiently solve the optimization problem. First, real PV and load data are used to characterize the scenarios. Then, the proposed scheme is experimentally validated on a PV-based nanogrid. The results show that the two-layer scenario-based MPC outperforms the two-layer chance-constrained MPC and significantly improves performance compared to a rule-based energy management system.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50615,"journal":{"name":"Control Engineering Practice","volume":"157 ","pages":"Article 106249"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Control Engineering Practice","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967066125000127","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In microgrids and nanogrids, challenges arise from the inherent intermittency of renewable energy sources and the need to meet uncertain energy demand from users. To address these uncertainties, this paper investigates a two-layer, scenario-based stochastic Model Predictive Control (MPC) for a real lab-scale photovoltaic (PV)-based nanogrid. The high-level layer, which operates slowly and over longer time horizons, computes optimal reference values for the low-level layer based on predictions of uncertainty in PV generation and consumer load. The low-level layer, which operates on shorter time horizons and at higher frequencies, relies on scenario-based MPC. Scenario-based MPC has several advantages, such as not requiring prior knowledge of the underlying probability distribution. However, it can suffer from significant computational burdens, especially in real-time applications like nanogrid control. To overcome this challenge, this paper employs the Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers (ADMM) to efficiently solve the optimization problem. First, real PV and load data are used to characterize the scenarios. Then, the proposed scheme is experimentally validated on a PV-based nanogrid. The results show that the two-layer scenario-based MPC outperforms the two-layer chance-constrained MPC and significantly improves performance compared to a rule-based energy management system.
期刊介绍:
Control Engineering Practice strives to meet the needs of industrial practitioners and industrially related academics and researchers. It publishes papers which illustrate the direct application of control theory and its supporting tools in all possible areas of automation. As a result, the journal only contains papers which can be considered to have made significant contributions to the application of advanced control techniques. It is normally expected that practical results should be included, but where simulation only studies are available, it is necessary to demonstrate that the simulation model is representative of a genuine application. Strictly theoretical papers will find a more appropriate home in Control Engineering Practice''s sister publication, Automatica. It is also expected that papers are innovative with respect to the state of the art and are sufficiently detailed for a reader to be able to duplicate the main results of the paper (supplementary material, including datasets, tables, code and any relevant interactive material can be made available and downloaded from the website). The benefits of the presented methods must be made very clear and the new techniques must be compared and contrasted with results obtained using existing methods. Moreover, a thorough analysis of failures that may happen in the design process and implementation can also be part of the paper.
The scope of Control Engineering Practice matches the activities of IFAC.
Papers demonstrating the contribution of automation and control in improving the performance, quality, productivity, sustainability, resource and energy efficiency, and the manageability of systems and processes for the benefit of mankind and are relevant to industrial practitioners are most welcome.