You and me: The influence of personality on the trust process in (un)trustworthy, (un)familiar interactions

IF 3.5 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
August Capiola , Gene M. Alarcon , Krista N. Harris , Sarah A. Jessup , Izz aldin Hamdan , Jacob Noblick , Dexter Johnson
{"title":"You and me: The influence of personality on the trust process in (un)trustworthy, (un)familiar interactions","authors":"August Capiola ,&nbsp;Gene M. Alarcon ,&nbsp;Krista N. Harris ,&nbsp;Sarah A. Jessup ,&nbsp;Izz aldin Hamdan ,&nbsp;Jacob Noblick ,&nbsp;Dexter Johnson","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2024.113007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The trust process has been researched extensively. However, one under-researched aspect is the influence of individual differences on trust-relevant criteria in interactions comprising familiar versus unfamiliar partners who are (un)trustworthy. The present work manipulated both partner trustworthiness and familiarity in a mixed-design, examining the influence of propensity to trust and risk aversion in an in-person, collaborative task. Using a growth modeling approach, this work examined the influence of propensity to trust and risk aversion on the intercept and slope variance, respectively, of criteria of interest. Results demonstrated propensity to trust accounted for trustors’ intercept variance for benevolence and integrity perceptions, regardless of whether they knew the trustee. However, risk aversion did not predict criteria of interest. The results speak to the importance of assessing individual differences in psychological experiments investigating the trust process, motivating future work to further investigate the degree to which a trustor is familiar with the trustee and increased monetary risk in dyadic interactions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"236 ","pages":"Article 113007"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886924004677","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The trust process has been researched extensively. However, one under-researched aspect is the influence of individual differences on trust-relevant criteria in interactions comprising familiar versus unfamiliar partners who are (un)trustworthy. The present work manipulated both partner trustworthiness and familiarity in a mixed-design, examining the influence of propensity to trust and risk aversion in an in-person, collaborative task. Using a growth modeling approach, this work examined the influence of propensity to trust and risk aversion on the intercept and slope variance, respectively, of criteria of interest. Results demonstrated propensity to trust accounted for trustors’ intercept variance for benevolence and integrity perceptions, regardless of whether they knew the trustee. However, risk aversion did not predict criteria of interest. The results speak to the importance of assessing individual differences in psychological experiments investigating the trust process, motivating future work to further investigate the degree to which a trustor is familiar with the trustee and increased monetary risk in dyadic interactions.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.70%
发文量
577
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Personality and Individual Differences is devoted to the publication of articles (experimental, theoretical, review) which aim to integrate as far as possible the major factors of personality with empirical paradigms from experimental, physiological, animal, clinical, educational, criminological or industrial psychology or to seek an explanation for the causes and major determinants of individual differences in concepts derived from these disciplines. The editors are concerned with both genetic and environmental causes, and they are particularly interested in possible interaction effects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信