Sagittal abdominal diameter: A novel and potentially superior indicator than waist circumference for diagnosis of central obesity, based on evidence from multiple data sources

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Zhuoqing Hu , Rutao Liang , Yimei Chen , Wen Shi , Liankun Zeng , Chao Li , Guanni Li , Yuting Ran , Zheng Tang , Jinrong Xu , Wangen Li
{"title":"Sagittal abdominal diameter: A novel and potentially superior indicator than waist circumference for diagnosis of central obesity, based on evidence from multiple data sources","authors":"Zhuoqing Hu ,&nbsp;Rutao Liang ,&nbsp;Yimei Chen ,&nbsp;Wen Shi ,&nbsp;Liankun Zeng ,&nbsp;Chao Li ,&nbsp;Guanni Li ,&nbsp;Yuting Ran ,&nbsp;Zheng Tang ,&nbsp;Jinrong Xu ,&nbsp;Wangen Li","doi":"10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2025.119107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and aims</h3><div>Our previous research reported a visceral fat area (VFA) estimation equation primarily based on sagittal abdominal diameter (SAD), demonstrating favorable performance compared to traditional Waist Circumference (WC)-based equations. While WC is widely used for central obesity measurement, its accuracy needs improvement. This study aims to investigate whether SAD has advantages over WC in diagnosing central obesity and to determine the optimal cut-off values for diagnosis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This cross-sectional, retrospective cohort study analyzed 6762 individuals from NHANES (2011–2016) and 701 from Chinese health examinations (2023). ROC curve analysis compared AUC of different indicators in identifying two or more non-adipose components of Metabolic Syndrome (MetS).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>SAD exhibited the strongest correlation with VFA and demonstrated the strongest associations with most metabolic parameters compared to WC and BMI. Furthermore, compared with WC, SAD had significantly higher AUC values in diagnosing two or more non-adipose components of MetS, with the difference being significant in the NHANES database population (all <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). The optimal SAD cut-off value was approximately 21.0 cm for both genders and populations, with MetS prevalence increasing rapidly at SAD≥22.0 cm. Subgroup analysis of NHANES revealed variations in optimal SAD cut-off values: Other Races (23.7 cm), Non-Hispanic Black females (18.8 cm), and other subgroups (20.0–22.0 cm).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>SAD demonstrates higher efficacy than WC in diagnosing central obesity, suggesting its suitability for assessing central obesity. Additionally, SAD shows potential for a unified diagnostic cut-off value across genders and regions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8623,"journal":{"name":"Atherosclerosis","volume":"402 ","pages":"Article 119107"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atherosclerosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021915025000048","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims

Our previous research reported a visceral fat area (VFA) estimation equation primarily based on sagittal abdominal diameter (SAD), demonstrating favorable performance compared to traditional Waist Circumference (WC)-based equations. While WC is widely used for central obesity measurement, its accuracy needs improvement. This study aims to investigate whether SAD has advantages over WC in diagnosing central obesity and to determine the optimal cut-off values for diagnosis.

Methods

This cross-sectional, retrospective cohort study analyzed 6762 individuals from NHANES (2011–2016) and 701 from Chinese health examinations (2023). ROC curve analysis compared AUC of different indicators in identifying two or more non-adipose components of Metabolic Syndrome (MetS).

Results

SAD exhibited the strongest correlation with VFA and demonstrated the strongest associations with most metabolic parameters compared to WC and BMI. Furthermore, compared with WC, SAD had significantly higher AUC values in diagnosing two or more non-adipose components of MetS, with the difference being significant in the NHANES database population (all p < 0.001). The optimal SAD cut-off value was approximately 21.0 cm for both genders and populations, with MetS prevalence increasing rapidly at SAD≥22.0 cm. Subgroup analysis of NHANES revealed variations in optimal SAD cut-off values: Other Races (23.7 cm), Non-Hispanic Black females (18.8 cm), and other subgroups (20.0–22.0 cm).

Conclusion

SAD demonstrates higher efficacy than WC in diagnosing central obesity, suggesting its suitability for assessing central obesity. Additionally, SAD shows potential for a unified diagnostic cut-off value across genders and regions.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Atherosclerosis
Atherosclerosis 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
3.80%
发文量
1269
审稿时长
36 days
期刊介绍: Atherosclerosis has an open access mirror journal Atherosclerosis: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. Atherosclerosis brings together, from all sources, papers concerned with investigation on atherosclerosis, its risk factors and clinical manifestations. Atherosclerosis covers basic and translational, clinical and population research approaches to arterial and vascular biology and disease, as well as their risk factors including: disturbances of lipid and lipoprotein metabolism, diabetes and hypertension, thrombosis, and inflammation. The Editors are interested in original or review papers dealing with the pathogenesis, environmental, genetic and epigenetic basis, diagnosis or treatment of atherosclerosis and related diseases as well as their risk factors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信