Olga E. Hart , Amanda Wachtel , Katherine Jones , Tony Jimenez , Peter Gregory , David Tam
{"title":"Beyond money: A social burden framework to enhance resilience valuation for tribal communities in the United States","authors":"Olga E. Hart , Amanda Wachtel , Katherine Jones , Tony Jimenez , Peter Gregory , David Tam","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.103934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article reflects on the present challenges of making proactive investments in critical infrastructure resilience and proposes recommendations for better integrating non-financial benefits into investment and project financing decision-making. Quantitative methodologies are required to enable communities, utilities, and financing organizations to evaluate return on investment through a more complete, socio-economic lens that more fully captures the true returns of alternative resilience proposals. Although this need is universal, it is further exacerbated in historically disadvantaged, under-resourced, and disenfranchised communities which were excluded from large-scale federal-level infrastructure investments in the past, and in which today, the onus of securing financing for infrastructure resilience projects falls on community members. This need is illustrated, and a solution for it demonstrated, through a case study of a successful implementation of such a techno-socio-economic resilience investment valuation framework in a tribal context.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"120 ","pages":"Article 103934"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625000155","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article reflects on the present challenges of making proactive investments in critical infrastructure resilience and proposes recommendations for better integrating non-financial benefits into investment and project financing decision-making. Quantitative methodologies are required to enable communities, utilities, and financing organizations to evaluate return on investment through a more complete, socio-economic lens that more fully captures the true returns of alternative resilience proposals. Although this need is universal, it is further exacerbated in historically disadvantaged, under-resourced, and disenfranchised communities which were excluded from large-scale federal-level infrastructure investments in the past, and in which today, the onus of securing financing for infrastructure resilience projects falls on community members. This need is illustrated, and a solution for it demonstrated, through a case study of a successful implementation of such a techno-socio-economic resilience investment valuation framework in a tribal context.
期刊介绍:
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers.
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.