Watered down justice: Experiences of the offshore wind transition in Northeast coastal communities in the United States

IF 6.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Tiffany Smythe , Emma Korein , Sara Swett , David Bidwell , Jeremy Firestone , Kelsey Leonard
{"title":"Watered down justice: Experiences of the offshore wind transition in Northeast coastal communities in the United States","authors":"Tiffany Smythe ,&nbsp;Emma Korein ,&nbsp;Sara Swett ,&nbsp;David Bidwell ,&nbsp;Jeremy Firestone ,&nbsp;Kelsey Leonard","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Offshore wind is a growing part of coastal states' energy portfolios and is undergoing rapid expansion in the United States. A robust body of research examines this transition through the lens of energy justice, which we employed in an exploratory qualitative analysis of offshore wind in northeast United States coastal communities where the first projects are located. Our goal was to investigate community members' experiences of distributive, recognition, and procedural justice regarding offshore wind development. We selected five frontline coastal communities and conducted 37 interviews, seeking representation from local/state governments; port/working waterfront businesses; the fishing community, and community groups, with a focus on low-income and Black, Indigenous and People of Color (BIPOC) community members. Thematic analysis of interviews revealed six themes and associated sub-themes synthesizing participants' experiences. Analysis revealed that community members observed and experienced linkages between distributive, recognition and procedural forms of justice. Findings both illustrate these linkages and provide insights into the individual tenets. Participants experienced the government-led planning and permitting process itself as the problem. They believed that the primacy of local communities was inadequately recognized, and held complex and nuanced views of benefits and burdens. Further, participants observed that low-income and BIPOC community members are experiencing injustices. Results support multiple recommendations for research and practice, including an integrated approach to energy justice scholarship and practice that acknowledges the linkages between the three justice tenets. We also recommend process improvements and a commitment to engaging with and supporting low-income and BIPOC communities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"120 ","pages":"Article 103919"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624005103","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Offshore wind is a growing part of coastal states' energy portfolios and is undergoing rapid expansion in the United States. A robust body of research examines this transition through the lens of energy justice, which we employed in an exploratory qualitative analysis of offshore wind in northeast United States coastal communities where the first projects are located. Our goal was to investigate community members' experiences of distributive, recognition, and procedural justice regarding offshore wind development. We selected five frontline coastal communities and conducted 37 interviews, seeking representation from local/state governments; port/working waterfront businesses; the fishing community, and community groups, with a focus on low-income and Black, Indigenous and People of Color (BIPOC) community members. Thematic analysis of interviews revealed six themes and associated sub-themes synthesizing participants' experiences. Analysis revealed that community members observed and experienced linkages between distributive, recognition and procedural forms of justice. Findings both illustrate these linkages and provide insights into the individual tenets. Participants experienced the government-led planning and permitting process itself as the problem. They believed that the primacy of local communities was inadequately recognized, and held complex and nuanced views of benefits and burdens. Further, participants observed that low-income and BIPOC community members are experiencing injustices. Results support multiple recommendations for research and practice, including an integrated approach to energy justice scholarship and practice that acknowledges the linkages between the three justice tenets. We also recommend process improvements and a commitment to engaging with and supporting low-income and BIPOC communities.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信