To manage or abolish energy poverty? A governmentality analysis

IF 7.4 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Lee Towers
{"title":"To manage or abolish energy poverty? A governmentality analysis","authors":"Lee Towers","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article examines energy poverty in England with a focus on community energy actors providing energy advice in food banks and an immigration advice centre in the South East. It employs a governmentality perspective using a four-part analytical framework examining visibilities, techniques and technologies of government, political rationalities and subjectivities. The specific methods employed were participant observation and semi-structured interviews. I found a distinct difference in how government and funders see and act on this problem, to how community energy and associated actors see and act on this problem. The former see energy poverty as an issue of individual households' energy inefficiency and policy is focused on this, although without really addressing the problem. The latter see energy poverty as connected to the broader issue of multidimensional poverty, or many aspects of the current political economy impoverishing people. These differing ways of constructing the problem/solution lead to very different broader questions. On the one hand, the governance perspective asks how to <em>manage</em> energy poverty, which assumes this problem will and should continue. On the other hand, community energy and associated actors question the purpose of our energy system and by implication the wider political system. It is in the latter's questions that we will find a just transformation this country and the wider world needs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"120 ","pages":"Article 103880"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624004717","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines energy poverty in England with a focus on community energy actors providing energy advice in food banks and an immigration advice centre in the South East. It employs a governmentality perspective using a four-part analytical framework examining visibilities, techniques and technologies of government, political rationalities and subjectivities. The specific methods employed were participant observation and semi-structured interviews. I found a distinct difference in how government and funders see and act on this problem, to how community energy and associated actors see and act on this problem. The former see energy poverty as an issue of individual households' energy inefficiency and policy is focused on this, although without really addressing the problem. The latter see energy poverty as connected to the broader issue of multidimensional poverty, or many aspects of the current political economy impoverishing people. These differing ways of constructing the problem/solution lead to very different broader questions. On the one hand, the governance perspective asks how to manage energy poverty, which assumes this problem will and should continue. On the other hand, community energy and associated actors question the purpose of our energy system and by implication the wider political system. It is in the latter's questions that we will find a just transformation this country and the wider world needs.
管理或消除能源贫困?治理分析
本文考察了英格兰的能源贫困,重点关注社区能源行为者在食品银行和东南部的移民咨询中心提供能源建议。它采用治理的观点,使用四部分分析框架来审查政府的可见性、技巧和技术、政治合理性和主观性。研究的具体方法为参与观察和半结构化访谈。我发现政府和资助者对这个问题的看法和行动,与社区能源和相关行动者对这个问题的看法和行动有明显的不同。前者认为能源贫困是单个家庭能源效率低下的问题,政策关注于此,尽管没有真正解决这个问题。后者认为能源贫困与更广泛的多维贫困问题或当前政治经济使人们贫困的许多方面有关。这些构建问题/解决方案的不同方式导致了非常不同的更广泛的问题。一方面,治理视角要求如何管理能源贫困,它假设这个问题将会并且应该继续下去。另一方面,社区能源和相关行动者质疑我们能源系统的目的,并暗示更广泛的政治系统。正是在后者的问题中,我们将找到这个国家和更广泛的世界所需要的公正变革。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信